Search Results

1. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Ltd has agreed to leave the offer made to NT during the hearing on the table as a gesture of goodwill, I order that R Ltd is liable to pay her $5,000.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 19 December 2023 Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. LL v DA [2023] NZDT 702 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make the order required by LL, the claim has been struck out. LL may seek his own advice about the best course of action. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 13 December 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. BL v EE [2024] NZDT 273 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...keep to my money loan agreement” sufficiently shows EE understood she was being loaned money to help her out. 7. I award the amount of $5,415.00 be paid to BL by EE. Referee: S Connell Date: 27 March 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. GC v U New Zealand [2024] NZDT 280 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...defect, rendering it not fit for the purpose or of acceptable quality, I find the claim must fail and is accordingly dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 17 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. UD v XI Ltd [2024] NZDT 345 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...omission on which the claim is based, and this means that no relief is available under either the Building Act or the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 in this case. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 29 April 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. CN v L Ltd & U Ltd [2024] NZDT 493 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...removing the remaining flue that was left by U Ltd. 30. For these reasons I find that the Respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay CN $7,173.62. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 4 July 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...repayment of the $2,400.00 is owed to her because she did not cause the damage. She claims the damage was done after delivering the car to where she was instructed to leave it by C Ltd. 4. ZH claims C Ltd deducted money from her account without informing her that they were going to do so due to damage they found when picking up the car. 5. The issue for the Tribunal to determine is whether there is a breach of the terms and conditions of agreement, Whether ZH did damage to the re...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 109 Rolling Thunder Motor Co Ltd v Kennedy [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...services from other businesses in the BarterCard scheme. It operates in a similar way to company credit cards. 8 The Plaintiff agreed to open the account with BarterCard. 9 To make the BarterCard scheme more relevant to the Plaintiff the Defendant requested that some employees of the Plaintiff (including herself) have their own personal accounts on the Plaintiff’s BarterCard account. This would allow them to make personal purchases for themselves and the employees would then reimb...

9. BORA Maungaharuru-Tangitū Hapū Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which are comparable to sections 20 and 27 (2) of the Bill of Rights Act. [4] Exclusion of Remedy of Compensation - clauses 30(3) and 34(3) 10. Clause 30(3) excludes any form of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure of the Crown to comply with Te Kawenata (a partnership agreement between MTI and the Crown applying to a specified area). Clause 34(3) is a similar provision excluding any form of...

10. Taylor v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 137 KB]

    ...DATE OF DECISION: 20 October 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 [1] In 2014, while in prison, Arthur Taylor sent a letter to Brian Hunter. The letter was withheld by the Department of Corrections (Corrections). Mr Taylor requested that the letter be returned to him, however this request was refused by Corrections. Mr Taylor complained to the Privacy Commissioner. The Privacy Commissioner concluded there was a breach of information privacy principle (IPP) 6 a...