Search Results

1. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

2. KE Ltd v BO Ltd [2020] NZDT 1536 (18 June 2020) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...necessary repairs to pass a COF check. 2. KE claims that BO kept delaying making a decision about the repairs, and became difficult to contact. On 12 February 2019, KE emailed BO stating “Your vehicle is now impacting our business”, and attaching formal notice that it would start charging a parking fee from the next day of $150.00 plus GST per day. The email and attached notice both ended, “To avoid further penalties, please contact us immediately.” BO did not respond to that emai...

3. IO v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 59 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. If he does not collect the car D Ltd can dispose of it in any manner it sees fit but IO is not entitled to a refund. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 13 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 148 Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...Knowsley, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 14 August 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] The plaintiff, Mr Ngawharau, was initially represented in this proceeding by a lay-person, Mr C Moses. The statement of claim Mr Moses filed was defective. In the course of a telephone directions conference on 8 July 2014, Mr Moses informed the Court that Mr Ngawharau was in the process of engaging legal counsel to represent him. On the same day, I issued...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...review its ability to provide support for Ms Shaw’s professional development before commenting that, unfortunately, due to ongoing budget constraints and adequate skilled coverage, the DHB continued to be unable to provide the support requested. [55] Ms Bayles ended her reply by noting she had decided to use Ms Shaw’s specialist skills within the “cath lab invasive service and PCI cover” for which she had appropriate knowledge and experience to the overall benefit to...

6. EMPC Form 2C - Notice accompanying statement of claim served outside NZ [doc, 28 KB]

   Form 2C Notice accompanying statement of claim served outside New Zealand Schedule 3, clause 5A, Employment Relations Act 2000 1 The plaintiff named in the attached statement of claim has commenced proceedings against you by filing a statement of claim in the Employment Court. 2 Even though you are outside New Zealand, the Court may hear and determine these proceedings. It may do so if the proceedings come within its jurisdiction. The grounds on which the plaintiff says that the proceeding...

7. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Ltd has agreed to leave the offer made to NT during the hearing on the table as a gesture of goodwill, I order that R Ltd is liable to pay her $5,000.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 19 December 2023 Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

8. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...repayment of the $2,400.00 is owed to her because she did not cause the damage. She claims the damage was done after delivering the car to where she was instructed to leave it by C Ltd. 4. ZH claims C Ltd deducted money from her account without informing her that they were going to do so due to damage they found when picking up the car. 5. The issue for the Tribunal to determine is whether there is a breach of the terms and conditions of agreement, Whether ZH did damage to the re...

9. KT & OX & SX v P Ltd [2021] NZDT 1614 (4 August 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...pipe that has had to be repaired. The Applicants claim compensation from P for their costs, but do not claim the cost of the new pump motor. 3. The Applicants claim from P damages of $6,200.80 (the Applicants had claimed $6,301.46 on the claim form, but reduced their claim at the hearing), calculated as follows: • $336.19, for the cost of repairing the damaged pipes • $945.39, being a refund of the double-charge regarding the one/three-phase cable (reduced from $1,046.05) �...

10. FD v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1714 (23 December 2021) [pdf, 152 KB]

    ...Omissions 4.1 The Client acknowledges and accepts that the Contractor shall, without prejudice, accept no liability in respect of any alleged or actual error(s) and/or omission(s); (a) resulting from an inadvertent mistake made by the Contractor in the formation and/or administration of this Contract; and/or (b) contained in/omitted from any literature (hard copy and/or electronic) supplied by the Contractor in respect of the Works” 17. B Ltd discovered that it had made a mistake in...