12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 40 APPLICANT FC RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. FC has claimed that DN misrepresented the age of the horse ‘C’ when she advertised him for sale. FC based her claim on the finding of SM of [vet clinic]. The assessment from a thorough examination of C’s teeth was that he was born in 2019...
...because they clearly service commercial buildings a reasonable person would be aware the spaces are not for the general public to park in. 5. I have considered whether $396.55 is a reasonable cost. I am aware from numerous claims the cost to perform a private tow to the towing companies yard is more than a point-to-point tow. The tow company must cover the cost of insurance, storage the cost of monitoring the carparks. The amount charged is consistent with rates charged by other tow c...
WAITANGI TRIBUNAL INQUIRY UNDER THE TREATY OF WAITANGI ACT 1975 CONCERNING MARINE AND COASTAL AREA (TAKUTAI MOANA) CLAIMS (WAI 2660) NOTICE is hereby given that the Waitangi Tribunal has commenced a kaupapa inquiry into claims concerning the Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011 (the MACA Act). A final deadline for the filing of any new or amended claims seeking to participate in this inquiry has been set. Date: Wednesday 20 June 2018 Deadline: 12:00pm To: The Registrar Wait...
...evidence to indicate that the Respondent misled the Applicant in any way so that he would sign the document. 12. Given this, I find that the Applicant is liable to pay the marketing costs in the amount of $2,445.00. 13. The Respondent has also claimed the amount of the debt recovery costs being $710.94. The Tribunal has limited discretion in awarding costs. In the present case, I do not consider it appropriate to award such costs. Referee: A Chand Date: 30th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 541 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT MDC The Tribunal orders: MDC is to deliver DC’s house keys to her letterbox at the agreed address by Thursday 12 October 2023; and The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC and MDC are estranged family members, whose mother was seriously ill before passing away in late October 2022....
...Shelley Wright, as the representative of the owners of the complex at 52 Aitken Terrace, Kingsland has applied to review the eligibility decision of the chief executive in relation to their multi unit complex claim. On 20 December 2011 they filed an application for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. The assessor and the chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible claim because it was not filed within ten years of when the complex w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1627 APPLICANT IM RESPONDENT KZ The Tribunal orders: The claim by IM against KZ is struck out because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine it. REASONS 1. IM worked for ON and began providing care to KZ’s 92-year-old father (who has since passed away) through ON in May 2020. KZ’s mother req...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 176 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay SM $951.82 on or before 28 March 2024. Reasons 1. In January 2023 SM purchased a [caravan] from KN via [sales website] for a price of $1,700.00. The advertisement said that the chassis looks to be in “great condition”. In response to a question during the auction...
...HEGEDUS V ACTRONIC LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2013] NZEmpC 26 [7 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 26 ARC 73/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN MICHAEL HEGEDUS Applicant AND ACTRONIC LIMITED Respondent Hearing: By way of submissions dated 18 and 26 February 2013 Counsel: Michael Hegedus, applicant Ray Parmenter, counsel for respondent Judgment: 7 March 2013 JUDGMENT OF...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 408 APPLICANT BB RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BB had a dining table and 8 chairs, which BB says has been in her family for many years and that she had used for 35 years before lending the set to KU approximately 7 or 8 years ago. BB had married KU’s father in July 2011 and...