Search Results

1. HB v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 582 (26 August 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...is no basis to consider an award of compensation. Therefore, it is not necessary to consider the second issue. 9. In summary, the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 26 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Ltd has agreed to leave the offer made to NT during the hearing on the table as a gesture of goodwill, I order that R Ltd is liable to pay her $5,000.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 19 December 2023 Page 7 of 7 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...review its ability to provide support for Ms Shaw’s professional development before commenting that, unfortunately, due to ongoing budget constraints and adequate skilled coverage, the DHB continued to be unable to provide the support requested. [55] Ms Bayles ended her reply by noting she had decided to use Ms Shaw’s specialist skills within the “cath lab invasive service and PCI cover” for which she had appropriate knowledge and experience to the overall benefit to...

4. Lim v Gu-Chang [2014] NZIACDT 77 (29 August 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...to determine: [6.1] Ms Gu-Chang acted unprofessionally and breached the complainant’s right to confidentiality through a publication on her website. [6.2] She overcharged the complainant by charging fees of $12,800 for making a discretionary request for a student visa. [7] The background for the complaint as set out in the Statement of Complaint is: [7.1] The complainant had been in New Zealand without a valid visa since 2007 and in late 2010 he approached Ms Gu-Chang’s practice...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Mangatū Remedies Report [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...the autonomy of the applicants can only come from the Crown . We therefore consider that TAMA’s energies would be better spent in completing negotiations with the Crown as soon as possible . Moreover, TAMA has in fact been offered redress in the form of an option to obtain the whole of the Mangatū CFL lands including CFL land lying outside the Tūranga district and over which the Tribunal has no jurisdiction . In these circumstances we have decided to adjourn TAMA’s application pendi...

6. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

7. KE Ltd v BO Ltd [2020] NZDT 1536 (18 June 2020) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...necessary repairs to pass a COF check. 2. KE claims that BO kept delaying making a decision about the repairs, and became difficult to contact. On 12 February 2019, KE emailed BO stating “Your vehicle is now impacting our business”, and attaching formal notice that it would start charging a parking fee from the next day of $150.00 plus GST per day. The email and attached notice both ended, “To avoid further penalties, please contact us immediately.” BO did not respond to that emai...

8. IO v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 59 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. If he does not collect the car D Ltd can dispose of it in any manner it sees fit but IO is not entitled to a refund. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 13 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...repayment of the $2,400.00 is owed to her because she did not cause the damage. She claims the damage was done after delivering the car to where she was instructed to leave it by C Ltd. 4. ZH claims C Ltd deducted money from her account without informing her that they were going to do so due to damage they found when picking up the car. 5. The issue for the Tribunal to determine is whether there is a breach of the terms and conditions of agreement, Whether ZH did damage to the re...

10. KT & OX & SX v P Ltd [2021] NZDT 1614 (4 August 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...pipe that has had to be repaired. The Applicants claim compensation from P for their costs, but do not claim the cost of the new pump motor. 3. The Applicants claim from P damages of $6,200.80 (the Applicants had claimed $6,301.46 on the claim form, but reduced their claim at the hearing), calculated as follows: • $336.19, for the cost of repairing the damaged pipes • $945.39, being a refund of the double-charge regarding the one/three-phase cable (reduced from $1,046.05) �...