Search Results

1. Re Alkazaz (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2020] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr A Alkazaz in person The intended defendant was not heard DATE OF DECISION: 23 October 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL THAT INTENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING1 Introduction [1] Mr Alkazaz has asked the Chairperson of the Tribunal to review a decision by the Secretary to reject proceedings which Mr Alkazaz wishes to file under the Privacy Act 1993. He is curre...

2. HRRT Statement of claim under the Health & Disability Commissioner Act [pdf, 422 KB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals The Human Rights Review Tribunal Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals HRRT 06/09 - 2 Office use only: HRRT No Statement of Claim (under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994) What is this form for? Use this form if you have a claim under Section 51 of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. Important Information 1. Please print in CAPITAL LETTERS 2. You need to file this claim for...

3. Re Dunstan (Rejection of Statements of Claim No. 2) [2024] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Dunstan, in person The intended defendants were not heard DATE OF DECISION: 9 April 2024 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON REJECTING INTENDED STATEMENTS OF CLAIM1 [1] In August 2023, Ms Dunstan presented five statements of claim for filing in the Tribunal, each one alleging interferences with her privacy in breach of the Privacy Act 2020 (the Act). [2] The two intended claims filed on 15 Aug...

4. Insurance Prompt Settlement of Claims for Uninhabitable Residential Property Bill [pdf, 106 KB]

   LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 4 February 2020 Hon David Parker, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Insurance (Prompt Settlement of Claims for Uninhabitable Residential Property) Bill Please find attached our advice about the consistency of this Bill with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with that Act. Details of the Bill Member: Stuart Smith Bill Type: Member's Bill Commi...

5. Regulatory Impact Statement: Increasing the maximum claim level in Disputes Tribunals [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...considered all of the possible maximum claims levels that could be set. Assessing at which point people would require better protections (such as better appeal rights) is difficult, and more time and resource would be needed to survey potential applicants to determine when they would make this judgment. Analysis of whether or not civil legal aid eligibility should be changed is not feasible because the Government has already made final decisions in this area. The Ministry has not...

6. Regulatory Impact Statement increasing maximum claims level in disputes tribunals [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...considered all of the possible maximum claims levels that could be set. Assessing at which point people would require better protections (such as better appeal rights) is difficult, and more time and resource would be needed to survey potential applicants to determine when they would make this judgment. Analysis of whether or not civil legal aid eligibility should be changed is not feasible because the Government has already made final decisions in this area. The Ministry has not...

7. Hetherington v Accident Compensation Corporation Claims Process [2023] NZACC 37 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This appeal relates to an appeal lodged by Mr Hetherington on 19 February 2020. The appeal is against the decision of a Reviewer dated 7 February 2020. The Reviewer dismissed Mr Hetherington’s review applications, for want of jurisdiction. Background [2] On 28 November 1979 Mr Hetherington injured his back. Following a review application in 1981, on 31 May 1982, a Reviewer held that Mr Hetherington suffered personal injury by accident...

8. Brown v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2023] NZACC 213 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-a-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 19 December 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claims process – s 54, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 20 April 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decisi...

9. Alves v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2023 NZACC 197] [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...Wellington/Whanganui-a-tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented C Hlavac and M Gall for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 5 December 2023 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claims process, ss 149(3) and 317, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 24 May 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review on the basis of...

10. Pouakani Claims Trust v Tuaropaki A Trust - Pouakani Claims Trust (2006) 83 Taupo MB 155 (83 TPO 155) [pdf, 663 KB]

    ...from this Court for mandate per section 30 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 in the context of negotiations concerning the Waikato River and the Pouakani tribes. The respondents, Raukawa Trust Board, Tuaropaki A Trust and Ngati Whaita Trust all claimed to be affected by the application, which they opposed, and sought to be heard. Following a series of judicial conferences and other interlocutory steps, on the eve of commencement of the hearing Mr Paki initially sought an adjournment...