12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 536 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: DD Must pay H Ltd $1,012.00 by 4pm on 7 November 2023. Reasons: 1. The respondent provided the services of an electrician to the applicant. The applicant was charged $1,257.38 for this work of which $195.00 has been paid to date. The applicant is unhappy with the work and the amo...
GREGORY DOUGLAS HALL V WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 78 [9 May 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 78 ARC 82/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove proceedings to the Court BETWEEN GREGORY DOUGLAS HALL Applicant AND WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: Following memoranda filed on 8 May 2013 (At Auckland) Counsel: Tony Drake, counsel for applicant Phillipa Muir, co...
...to disconnect existing steam operated machines and install new steam and water pipes for new machines. The job was to be done in two stages, to ensure new the machines were up and running before old machines were disconnected. 2. The Applicant claims that the contract was time and materials and that no estimate or quote was provided. The Respondent claims that the Applicant provided a verbal estimate of $5,000.00 plus GST. 3. The job was expected to take 2 days but stage 1 took...
...Initial instructions not followed through $290 For • taking instructions, attending the client • preparing application for legal aid • contacting the client • closing the file • reporting to client Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/order(s) Activity Fees T...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 284 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. X Ltd purchased some tractor duals (wheels) from K Ltd. SB from K Ltd and DP from X Ltd agreed that X Ltd could pick the duals up at any time from K Ltd’s yard. SB was not always at his yard in [City] and noticed about three...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 528 APPLICANT UO Ltd RESPONDENT UI Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BU THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: 1. UI Ltd is to pay UO Ltd the amount of $3,586.68 on or before 12 August 2024. 2. UE’s name is corrected to be ND. 3. The claims against BU and ND are dismissed. Reason 1. UI Ltd had a c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 3 APPLICANT GG Limited RESPONDENT IN Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim by GG Limited against IN Limited is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant company GG Limited (GG) was placed into liquidation and appointed HX of CS as Liquidator. GG through its liquidator now brings a claim against IN Limited (IN) for $1...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 202 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT XT The Tribunal orders: XT is to pay $300.00 to BW by 25/1/23. Reasons: 1. XT was called twice: at the allocated time for this hearing and again 5 or so minutes later. Both calls were unanswered and went to a message service. Messages were left including that if the second call was not answered the hearing w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1421 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT LX The Tribunal orders: LX is to pay TQ the sum of $11,528.88 by 4pm on 22 April 2021. Reasons: 1. On 13 September 2019 TQ was walking her dog, B, in the [Gardens] when her dog was attacked by LX’s dog, N. B required vet care to treat his injuries that resulted from the attack. TQ claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 228 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TM against B Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. TM travelled by air from [International city 1] via [International city 2] to [NZ city]. The [International city 2] to [NZ city] leg of his journey was operated by B Ltd. A dispute has arisen in relation...