Search Results

1. Gibbons v Armour Guard [2018] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...telephone call. The Privacy Commissioner’s certificate of investigation named Armour Guard as the sole respondent to the complaint, and recorded the Commissioner’s opinion that there had been no interference with Mr Gibbons’ privacy as the information requested did not exist. [3] Mr Gibbons also complained to the Privacy Commissioner that the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) had refused to supply him with CCTV footage of the same incident. The certificate of investigation...

2. CX-v-XC-Law-Firm-2015-NZDT-885-16-July-2015 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...but has subsequently sought to challenge it and continue with an appeal. [4] XC Law Firm have invoiced $5,045.55 for these services and CX requests a declaration of non-liability for that amount and for contractual interest added. XC Law Firm claim contractual interest of $1,068.97 to the date of the Tribunal hearing and submitted a counter-claim for payment of $5,742.47 including contractual interest to the date the claim was lodged. Issues [5] The issues to determine are:...

3. QL v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 752 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...

4. KH v BG [2024] NZDT 464 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 464 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT BG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KH had a pre-existing personal guarantee to pay rent. KH says BG agreed, when she became a director in the company, she would guarantee the rent liability under cl 5.9 of the sale and purchase agreement. The company went into liquidatio...

5. DO v CH [2024] NZDT 576 (29 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 576 APPLICANT DO RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DO is the head tenant of a property on [Address] and listed a room [online]. As a result, CH moved into the flatting situation and signed a fixed term agreement from 1 February 2024 to 8 May 2024. The agreement did not include a notice period c...

6. BD v ED [2020] NZDT 1383 (17 December 2020) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1383 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BD purchased a power meter from ED on a website titled “CT”. He alleges ED misrepresented the condition of the power meter and broke the rules of CT by refusing to refund the money he paid for the power meter. He claim...

7. Reekie v Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] In the present case the statement of reply was due to be filed on 20 April 2018. 1 [This decis...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 160 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G La Hood, counsel for plaintiff G Davenport, counsel for defendants Judgment: 25 September 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL [1] In the statement of claim filed by the plaintiff in this case, it sought declarations under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) in respect of three individuals, one of whom was Stuart Balchin. It was alleged he was an employee of either or bot...

9. SQ v KL & L Ltd [2023] NZDT 180 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1....

10. BL v CD (NZ) Ltd [2024] NZDT 282 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 282 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT CD (NZ) Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] BL wanted to find a serviced apartment for himself and his family for a proposed visit to [International City]. He entered a “CD” website, and went through the process of booking an apartment, for which he paid NZ$17,000.00. Subsequently,...