BU v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 427 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]
...referred to guidelines published by [Company] in support of her position. In contrast Q Ltd argued that a conduit was not required, and that it had met the minimum standards required by [Company]. 6. I accept that there is some inconsistency in the information given by [Company]. Each party relies on an email from a [Company] representative, supporting their position. They have both also referred to guidance published by [Company]. BU presented a booklet entitled “[redacted]” in w...