12502 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 268 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT NM The Tribunal orders: NM is to pay to D Ltd the amount of $1,153.05. Payment is to be made on or before 10 May 2024. Reasons 1. In May 2023 the applicant, D Ltd accepted a request to carry out a specialized cleaning job on NM’s home. The work was completed and invoiced for $3,153.05. A payment was made...
...to the cost of undertaking any work required by the terms of any easement relating to a vehicular right of way to serve on the other occupier, a written notice specifying in detail the work to be carried out. Section 309 of the PLA specifies what information should be included in any such notice. The notice must specify the consequences of a failure to comply with the notice. If the recipient of the notice disputes the nature and extent of the work required, they may serve a cross-notice.
...[2024] NZLCRO 045 Ref: LCRO 117/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN VN Applicant AND SC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant, Dr VN, has applied for review of a decision dated 23 June 2022 by the [...
...Reservation Trust) has applied to remove all trustees of the Reservation Trust under s 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) (Removal Application).2 [2] Ms Puohotaua alleges that the trustees have failed to act in several respects and claims that there is no confidence in the current trustees as evidenced by a ‘vote of no confidence’ at an online hui held on 10 March 2023 (Special Beneficiary Hui). [3] The sole issue for determination is whether the current Reservation...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 374 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $2,587.50 to KT and NT by the 21st June 2024. Reasons 1. KT and NT contracted N Ltd to lay concrete at their home. Whilst laying concrete on the driveway adjacent to the garage, concrete was splashed on to the new garage door. The same day as the p
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 549 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay QC $90.00 on or before 16 August 2024. Reasons 1. In about February 2024, QC won [an online] auction for a torque wrench from S Ltd trading as YD. He had won other items from this seller previously and the seller agreed to hold them all for him until he could pi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 369 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay LL $560.00 on or before 18 July 2024. Reasons 1. LL entered into a flatmate agreement with KN from September 2023 to May 2024. After the contract ended KN refused to refund LL’s bond because of concerns about damage to the house. 2. LL claims a refund of her bon...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 247 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay L Ltd $15,000.00 by 12 December 2022. Background 1. L Ltd is a retail jeweller with shops in New Zealand. 2. N Ltd is an insurance company based in [City]. 3. At N Ltd.’s request, L Ltd provided a valuation for items of jewellery....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 181 APPLICANT NX APPLICANT PX RESPONDENT Airline X The Tribunal orders: [Airline X] is to pay to NX and PX the sum of $1,298.20 on or before 20 October 2022. Reasons: 1. NX and PX (“the applicants”) booked flights directly with [Airline X] in May 2022. They were scheduled to travel from [City A] to [Cit...
...Insurance Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), as committed to in the Labour Party’s 2017 election manifesto, to provide an alternative pathway for claimants, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve outstanding earthquake-related insurance claims. Executive Summary 2 The 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes generated insurance claims in relation to over 167,677 residential properties. 98% of these claims have settled. However, seven years on, 2% of claims remain unresolve...