12907 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 106 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: QN is to pay $30,000.00 to KT by 29 September 2022. Reasons 1. KT was the successful buyer of [a sports car]. The sale included many [car] parts. The contract resulted from QN offering the items for sale in [an online auction]. Following the auction...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 383 APPLICANT NJ Ltd RESPONDENT UX Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NJ Ltd claims that it was overcharged for milk products purchased from UX Ltd in 2020 to 2021 for resale to customers in [overseas country]. NJ Ltd initially claimed that many products had not been received, but in later hearings NJ Ltd foc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 723 APPLICANT EV APPLICANT XV RESPONDENT DT SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EV and XV; and DT and KT, share a boundary fence. When EV and XV went to sell the property in 2022, a builder’s report indicated that the boundary fence needed to be rep
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 108 APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: DG is to pay KC $869.43 on or before 12 April 2023. Reasons: 1. DG engaged KC to assist him with an urgent employment dispute regarding outstanding pay. 2. KC attempted to engage DG’s employer to resolve the dispute, without success. KC invoiced DG the sum o...
...must share equal responsibility with I Ltd for their loss, I Ltd must pay them half of that sum, which is $5,558.31. [25] The applicants are entitled to interest on the sum that I have ordered that I Ltd must pay them. Under the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016, interest on the sum payable from 17 May to 5 December 2023 amounts to $165.44. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 6 [26] I have not allowed the applicants’ claim for compensation for stress. Damages for stress are unusu...
...been declined on 22 February 2021. [5] It is understood that the complainant approached Ms Li. The client signed a service agreement with Fayo on 23 March 2021. Fayo undertook to file a s 61 request for a partnership work visa and later an application for a partnership resident visa. The fee for the s 61 request was $2,500. If the work was terminated, the fee would be based on the hours worked at $300 per hour. [6] On 10 May 2021, Ms Li filed with Immigration NZ a request fo...
...___________________________________________________________________________ [1] H has lodged a claim with the Tribunal concerning the damage he says was suffered by his property at xxxx, Christchurch, during the Canterbury earthquakes between 4 September 2010 and 13 June 2011. [2] H’s application to the Tribunal was accompanied by a letter to which was attached a Court of Appeal judgement dated xx xx. That Court dismissed his appeal and upheld the High Court decision rejectin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 284 APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. MS purchased an induction cooktop from L Ltd on 7 January 2023 and says it cracked on 11 October (9 months later). He approached L Ltd who told him it was not deemed a manufacturing fault saying it was impact damage where something was...
...employee, director, shareholder or partner in the company or partnership that was contracted to carry out the plastering work. 7. Given the nature of the applications and the key jurisdictional issues involved, the parties were given an option of requesting a hearing to deal with the removal applications should they believe it be appropriate. Two of the respondents requested a hearing and accordingly a hearing convened in Tauranga on Tuesday 7th August 200...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 711 APPLICANT OL RESPONDENT CD Limited The Tribunal orders: CD Limited is to pay directly to OL the sum of $1,050 on or before Wednesday, 31 January 2024. Once payment is made, OL is to release the two purchased scooters to the respondent. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties...