12502 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 34 APPLICANT UI and II RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In late 2020 UI and II took their [car] to D Ltd because there was a leak between the convertible roof and the windscreen. UI and II say that they had read online that the seals can open up a bit and to ask the de...
...respondents. [2] Mr Galloway said his client was not seeking removal in the light of the decision of the High Court in Fenton v Building Code Consultants Ltd HC Auckland, CIV-2009-404-6348, 15 March 2010. Ms Donaldson did not wish to pursue a removal application as it was unlikely to succeed because of the requirement for the Tribunal to treat factual allegations in pleadings as being correct at the removal/strike out stage. [3] The High Court in Fenton held that s 112 and...
...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 214 APPLICANT OOJ RESPONDENT QD Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OOJ is in the business of running poker events. In April 2022 OOJ was approached at one of their events by BE who apparently introduced himself as the manager of QD Inc. 2. BE entered into a contract with OOJ to run we...
...NZTA has interfered with his privacy. [3] NZTA disputes that there has been any interference with Mr Pillay’s privacy and claims immunity in respect of both the disclosures. BACKGROUND [4] In November 2014 Mr Pillay imported the car and requested advice and repair from Mr Barlass, a NZTA accredited repair certifier. Mr Barlass worked with Bute Collision Repairs to have the repairs done for Mr Pillay. The car was then presented to VTNZ for compliance certification in accordance...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 47 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT MD The Tribunal orders: [MD] is to pay the sum of $5,000.00 to DQ on or before 1 February 2024. Reasons: 1. In July 2023, DQ placed an order with MD, trading as LQ, for 79 custom hoodies to be worn at the [sporting event]. The parties agreed on a price of $65.00 each, and DQ paid the invoiced total of $5,135.0...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 325 APPLICANT DB RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay directly to DB the sum of $1531.56 on or before Tuesday, 7 May 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant claims a refund following his purchase of a [brand] oven...
...before the Maori Land Court at Palmerston North on 4 September 2001 for determination of Te Matai Kawana Whanau Trust and constitution of the TRL Whanau Trust and orders were made accordingly. 2. At the same time an application was made by one of the applicants Rangi Paki for reimbursement of costs incurred by him in relation to the applications he had made to the Maori Land Court on behalf of his family. 3. The Court adjourned the question as to reimbursement of costs and stated that...
...Client Care Rules, and that this constituted unsatisfactory conduct. The Committee determined that the finding of unsatisfactory conduct recorded against his professional file, and an apology, were a sufficient penalty. It declined to consider the Applicant‟s claims for compensation. [3] The Committee concluded that P2‟s conduct was unsatisfactory in that he had failed to act in a competent and timely manner and failed to keep his client fully 2 informed. The Prac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 52 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT UN APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. At the request of the parties, the respondent is changed from KN to UN. 2. UN is to pay the sum of $10,237.93 to J Ltd on or before Friday 9 February 2024. Reasons: 1. On 18 April 2023, KQ discovered that his [car 1] had been damaged while par...