12509 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 40 APPLICANT FC RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. FC has claimed that DN misrepresented the age of the horse ‘C’ when she advertised him for sale. FC based her claim on the finding of SM of [vet clinic]. The assessment from a thorough examination of C’s teeth was that he was born in 2019...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 202 APPLICANT BW RESPONDENT XT The Tribunal orders: XT is to pay $300.00 to BW by 25/1/23. Reasons: 1. XT was called twice: at the allocated time for this hearing and again 5 or so minutes later. Both calls were unanswered and went to a message service. Messages were left including that if the second call was not answered the hearing w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1421 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT LX The Tribunal orders: LX is to pay TQ the sum of $11,528.88 by 4pm on 22 April 2021. Reasons: 1. On 13 September 2019 TQ was walking her dog, B, in the [Gardens] when her dog was attacked by LX’s dog, N. B required vet care to treat his injuries that resulted from the attack. TQ claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 284 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. X Ltd purchased some tractor duals (wheels) from K Ltd. SB from K Ltd and DP from X Ltd agreed that X Ltd could pick the duals up at any time from K Ltd’s yard. SB was not always at his yard in [City] and noticed about three...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 528 APPLICANT UO Ltd RESPONDENT UI Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BU THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: 1. UI Ltd is to pay UO Ltd the amount of $3,586.68 on or before 12 August 2024. 2. UE’s name is corrected to be ND. 3. The claims against BU and ND are dismissed. Reason 1. UI Ltd had a c...
...extent. [3] The facts on which the complaint is based are: [3.1] Mr Dua’s client instructed him to apply for a partnership work visa; his current visa was due to expire after a relatively short number of weeks later. Unless Mr Dua lodged the application, his client’s visa would expire and he would be in New Zealand unlawfully. Mr Dua failed to lodge the application; his client was then in New Zealand unlawfully. [3.2] Mr Dua then lodged a request for Immigration New Zealand to a...
...Initial instructions not followed through $290 For • taking instructions, attending the client • preparing application for legal aid • contacting the client • closing the file • reporting to client Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/order(s) Activity Fees T...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 40 ACR 83/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHELLE HAGAR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The Appellant self-represented Ms A Douglass for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 228 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TM against B Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. TM travelled by air from [International city 1] via [International city 2] to [NZ city]. The [International city 2] to [NZ city] leg of his journey was operated by B Ltd. A dispute has arisen in relation...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 541 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT MDC The Tribunal orders: MDC is to deliver DC’s house keys to her letterbox at the agreed address by Thursday 12 October 2023; and The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC and MDC are estranged family members, whose mother was seriously ill before passing away in late October 2022....