12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 707 APPLICANT ZQ RESPONDENT S Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT KN THIRD RESPONDENT FN The Tribunal orders: A. S Ltd is added as a Respondent. B. The claims against KN and FN are dismissed. C. S Ltd is to pay $1,270.00 to ZQ, on or before 9 September 2024. D. ZQ may regain possession of the door if he does so by 5pm on...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) AMENDED INTERIM ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1596 APPLICANT KS APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT TI SECOND RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. This order amends my order of 18 March 2020 to allow for the affect of timing caused by COVID 19. 2. TI & ND are to remove any and all changes they have made to the boundary fence including any
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 501 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT B The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EN had his bag stolen while in a shop in the departure lounge at [International airport]. On his return to New Zealand, he made a travel insurance claim and that was declined. 2. EN claims $1,102.20 for the property s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 19 APPLICANT HU Ltd RESPONDENT HO The Tribunal orders: HO is to pay HU Ltd $381.98 within 28 days. Reasons [1] HU Ltd, represented by BX, claims from HO $381.98. BX says that HO did not pay for three nights’ accommodation and food supplied to him on 18–20 October 2021 by HU Ltd, which runs a hotel in [Town]. [2] BX said that...
Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1437 APPLICANT EI Limited RESPONDENT SB Limited SECOND RESPONDENT HS The Tribunal hereby orders: HS is joined as a respondent to this application (right to 10 days’ notice waived). The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 27 November 2014 EN Li...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 701 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. KN is to pay OX the sum of $759.00 on or before 26 July 2024. Reasons: 1. KN owns the property next to OX. On the boundary of the properties was a large hedge, which KN cut back extensively. 2. OX now claims $1,518.00 as the cost of removing and disposing of the parts of the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 499 APPLICANT DD Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT QW BD Ltd The Tribunal orders, on the claim and the counter-claim: DD Ltd is to pay $30,000.00 to QW on or before 26 March 2024; and The claim against BD Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. DD Ltd provided a written quotation to QW for interior and exterior...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 350 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT KB The Tribunal orders: KB is ordered to pay MN the sum of $3,100.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 28 August 2023. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent, and the hearing proceeded in her absence. On 30 December 2022, the applicant lent the respondent the sum of...
...District Court - [2022] NZDT 121 APPLICANT GN APPLICANT GO RESPONDENT LQ Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Power Company U The Tribunal orders: 1. LQ Ltd to pay GN and GO $2,965.04 by 20 September 2022. 2. The Applicants claim against Power Company U is not proven and therefore dismissed. Reasons. The claim 1. The Applicants purchased a property from LQ Ltd on the 16 May 2021 pursuant to Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated 2 July 2020. When the...