Search Results

1. NT v OX & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 476 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...were cancelled, the Applicants hired a car and drove to [city 5]. They asked B Ltd to fly them out of [city 6] to [city 2] on 24 December, but received no response. By 26 December, they asked B Ltd to fly them home to New Zealand. B Ltd initially informed them that their return flights were from Country 2, and they would need to pay for any fare difference. On or about 28 December, the Applicants flew on B Ltd from [city 6] to [city 1] and then on to [city 7] on an B Ltd flight. The Appli...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 120 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...for the first, second and fourth defendants No appearance for third defendant Judgment: 6 July 2022 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH [1] Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) issued proceedings against its former employee, Jeremy Claxton, claiming damages from him arising from breaches of the employment agreement between them. It also sought a penalty from him for allegedly aiding and abetting breaches of an employment agreement by another e...

3. Waitangi Tribunal - application for media coverage and guide [pdf, 520 KB]

   ...The following conditions of coverage should apply: (a) Waitangi Tribunal Practice Note Guide to Practice and Procedure section 5:14 (as attached) (b) The presiding officer’s ruling or the Standard Conditions for Media Coverage Applicant information: Applicant’s name On behalf of (media entry) Business address Postal address Email address Telephone number Fax number Signed Date For Office Use Only Approved Declined Name Title Date Signed Waitangi Tribu...

4. LL v DA [2023] NZDT 702 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make the order required by LL, the claim has been struck out. LL may seek his own advice about the best course of action. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 13 December 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

5. BL v EE [2024] NZDT 273 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...keep to my money loan agreement” sufficiently shows EE understood she was being loaned money to help her out. 7. I award the amount of $5,415.00 be paid to BL by EE. Referee: S Connell Date: 27 March 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. GC v U New Zealand [2024] NZDT 280 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...defect, rendering it not fit for the purpose or of acceptable quality, I find the claim must fail and is accordingly dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 17 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. UD v XI Ltd [2024] NZDT 345 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...omission on which the claim is based, and this means that no relief is available under either the Building Act or the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 in this case. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 29 April 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interest on weekly compensation) [2024] NZACC 139 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...compensation on receipt of the medical certificate on 23 December 2004.2 [10] Mr Smith then claimed interest on arrears of weekly compensation for the period 4 October 1991 until February 2002. On 20 July 2007, the Corporation declined Mr Smith's request, and this decision was upheld on review. Mr Smith filed an appeal against the Reviewer’s decision. [11] On 30 May 2008, following an appeal hearing, Judge Cadenhead allowed Mr Smith’s appeal on the basis that he was ent...

9. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...moment. Therefore, I will issue this Determination which decides all other matters in this adjudication except for these two non-party claims for costs. 1.15 Mr Morrison, who was cited as the Fifth Respondent in this adjudication, made an informal application at the Hearing for recovery of his costs incurred when he was a party in the adjudication. He was struck out as a party in my Procedural Order No 6 on 11 March 2004. A formal claim for costs was made Claim No 0076...

10. CN v L Ltd & U Ltd [2024] NZDT 493 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...removing the remaining flue that was left by U Ltd. 30. For these reasons I find that the Respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay CN $7,173.62. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 4 July 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...