Search Results

1. [2016] NZSSAA 055 (16 June 2016) [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...October 2004 to November 2005. [5] Following the grant of New Zealand Superannuation, the appellant was requested to make an application for a retirement benefit to the United States Social Security Administration. The Ministry has made a number of requests to the appellant to complete an application for a United States benefit but the appellant has declined to do so. [6] The appellant seeks to defer making an application for a retirement benefit from the United States Social Security...

2. GT & AI v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 537 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 537 APPLICANT GT APPLICANT AI RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On 18 October 2021, AI and GT entered into an Agreement for Sale and Purchase to buy Lot X in a proposed new subdivision at [Address] from F Ltd. Settlement Date was to be 10 working days after the Vendor’s So...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 25 Air New Zealand Ltd v Milne [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...KATHLEEN MILNE NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 25 [20 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 25 ARC 17/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant AND KATHLEEN MILNE Respondent Judgment: 20 February 2012 INTERLOCUTOR...

4. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...application to remove the matter into the Court for hearing and determination. The Authority granted that application on 7 December 20071. [5] In the Court, the matter initially proceeded in the usual way. On 24 January 2008, a statement of claim was filed. A statement of defence was filed on 26 February 2008. I then held a telephone conference with counsel on 10 April 2008, the outcomes of which were recorded in a minute issued the following day. The plaintiff was directed t...

5. Smethurst [2015] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 139 KB]

   1 [2015] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 46: ARTHUR SMETHURST – POHUTUKAWA AVENUE, OHOPE ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Procedural Background [1] By letter dated 24 February 2015 Mr Smethurst wrote to the chair of the Weathertight Homes Tribunal seeking a review of his...

6. Māori Trustee v Te Pou - Waiohau A Section 4B (2012) 55 Waiariki MB 124 (55 WAR 124) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 55 Waiariki MB 124 (55 WAR 124) A20120007943 UNDER Sections 19 and 237, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waiohau A Section 4B BETWEEN MĀORI TRUSTEE Applicant AND MOIRA NANCY TE POU Respondent Hearing: 14 June 2012 (Heard at Hastings) Appearances: Mr G Shaw for the Applicant Judgment: 14 June 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] Christine Pe...

7. N Ltd v O Ltd [2022] NZDT 245 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 137 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 245 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay $2,630.32 to N Ltd by 15 December 2022. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. O Ltd contracted with N Ltd for freight services for live paua to China. The paua was transported by B Ltd. However before arriving in China the ai...

8. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ..._________________________________________________________________________ First Middle Surname Second Plaintiff _________________________________________________________________________ (if applicable) First Middle Surname Third Plaintiff _____________________________________________...

9. DK Ltd v UT [2024] NZDT 338 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 338 APPLICANT DK Ltd RESPONDENT UT C/- QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) The sole director of the applicant company, DK Ltd is, according to the companies register, TN. [At the hearing, TN suggested others were also directors. That is not indicated by the companies register]. TN says that in 2018 his mo...

10. LT v TU Ltd NZDT 1363 (4 December 2019) [pdf, 206 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1363 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT TU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms T parked in a visitor’s parking space at a residential complex where she was looking after a friend’s child, in excess of the stated time limit of two hours. TU Ltd, as an authorised agent of the owner...