Search Results

1. IX v J Ltd [2025] NZDT 23 (09 April 2025) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...this for the following reasons: - The same day as IX took possession of the vehicle a warning light engaged. - A pre-inspection was conducted by an organisation recommended by J Ltd this revealed there was water around the battery. J Ltd informed IX this was due to the vehicle being washed. However, IX took the car for a service shortly after taking CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 possession of it and was advised there was a ‘damp round engine tray’ and the source of th...

2. B Ltd v C Ltd & others [2024] NZDT 99 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...agreement has been proved in this respect. 47. There are a number of items that I consider it is most likely were not in good working order at the time of settlement. I make this finding on the basis of the evidence submitted by B Ltd, mostly in the form of photos. The list of items in this category, together with the book value, repair or replacement costs as evidenced by B Ltd is: Fire extinguishers $1,536.00 Electrical equipment $505.00 Fuse carrier $21.00 Workshop saf...

3. 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street [2013] NZWHT Auckland 13 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...the extent required by the building consent. He referred to s 43(1) of the Building Act 1991 which provides: 43 Code compliance certificate (1) An owner shall as soon as practicable advise the territorial authority, in the prescribed form, that the building work has been completed to the extent required by the building consent issued in respect of that building work. [6] The Court of Appeal concluded that a dwellinghouse would not be considered built for the purpose...

4. SR v SP [2020] NZDT 1424 (28 July 2020) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...12. The parties agreed $135.00 was a fair amount for a bale of lucerne. The amount that I find is reasonable is $8505.00 being 63 bales at $135.00 for each bale. Referee: C Murphy Date: 28 July 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. LF v JN & Ors [2024] NZDT 354 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...artwork] are not there now. 9. Having considered this matter and all of the evidence provided I do not consider that a contract existed in this case between JN and LF. 10. Both JN and LF said the arrangement for storing [the artwork] was an informal one between friends. There was no payment and no written agreement, although LF says he gave JN a koha each year of some Dutch liquorice that JN enjoys to say thank you for storing [the artwork]. 11. A legal obligation arises und...

6. IE v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 587 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...appointed counsel, Mr M, for NE. Mr M reported to the Court on 27 March 2018. He sought to obtain financial records from IE but at that stage IE told him that they would not be provided. Mr M then requested the Court to order IE to provide that information. It then transpired that IE had not kept adequate records. He has submitted in these proceedings that he was advised by X Ltd that he need not keep records of his expenditure. By not keeping records, he states that he was u...

7. Milligan v Robert Brown Developments Ltd [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...on completion. The Council also carried out inspections of the building works from time to time and recorded those inspections, including any requisitions, in Site Inspection Reports. 6 [15] During the course of construction the Claimant requested RBD to change the cladding of the unit from weatherboard to brick veneer and RBD agreed to the Claimant’s request. [16] Following a meeting between Eastwood, Holmes, RBD and Graeme Jacobs on or about 18 May 1998 to discuss ho...

8. AA v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 688 (22 December 2023) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...previously been enrolled as barristers/solicitors and could not therefore be approved as representatives under section 38(7) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. An adjournment order was emailed to both parties with the direction “N Ltd is to please inform the Tribunal of their representative’s name and direct phone number prior to the next hearing”. 5. As N LTD did not provide a representative name/direct phone number, I had no N LTD representative to ring for the second hearin...

9. IM v KL & B Ltd [2024] NZDT 867 (10 December 2024) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...$650.00. That leaves a balance of $9,500.00 owed by KL and B Ltd. Due to the Christmas break, I have allowed 28 days for payment rather than the usual 14 days. Referee: J P Smith Date: 10 December 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

10. OIA-97004.pdf [pdf, 810 KB]

    0 3 AUG 2022 Section (9) (2) (a) Tena koe - Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@j ustice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 97004 Official Information Act 1982 request: Information regarding civil disputes Thank you for your letter of 23 June 2022 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) , information regarding civil disputes in the Disputes Tr...