Search Results

1. EP v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 184 (15 May 2025) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...I note that even if that were not the case, I would have declined to award these as EP’s claim was unsuccessful. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 J Kleinbaum Disputes Tribunal Referee 15 May 2025 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. 2025] NZEmpC 183 Legal Hub Ltd v Singh [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...afterwards. Mr Cunningham withdrew the applications as they related to Ravinder Singh’s home, vehicle and KiwiBank account. [12] After the hearing Mr Cunningham filed a memorandum withdrawing the application relating to ASB Bank, because information about the accounts held with it was supplied to Legal Hub on Ravinder Singh’s behalf. Legal Hub continued the applications for discovery against Westpac and ANZ. [13] The grounds of the (revised) application remain: (a) I...

3. Form 24 - Criminal legal aid -Tax invoice - schedules D-F [pdf, 394 KB]

   Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 24 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules D-F Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type District Court High Court Court location Details of claim Date activ...

4. QQ v F Ltd [2025] NZDT 231 (27 May 2025) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...people. 3. [LC] of F Ltd says: a. There was a lot of hearsay in what QQ was saying. b. It was a moss treatment. He does not agree with what QQ says. F Ltd has been around since 1959 does a lot of these types of job. They didn’t change the formula they used for the wash. c. They bend over backwards to satisfy their customers. They tried to clean the windows in good faith as a customer service. d. All their workers are trained and audited before the start spraying. [Emp...

5. BS & WQ v K Ltd & ors [2023] NZDT 653 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...suggestion made by K Ltd. I further take into account the [Lawn Services Company] pricing was for the complete grounds that K Ltd relied on were from 2021. I expect the cost for the area to be remedied would have increased from 2021 and without updated information am satisfied that the price for the complete lawn might be sufficient to cover the partial lawn that needs remedying. Therefore, I find that BS and WQ are entitled to claim $8,000.00 from K Ltd and T Ltd and the remainder of the...

6. IN & Ors v GU & J Ltd [2024] NZDT 719 (26 August 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...voicemail. The claim went ahead without GU. 4. I called J Ltd for the hearing. I spoke to C, who is the manager of J Ltd. He said that since the collision occurred (in August 2023) J Ltd is under new ownership, and he and the current owners have no information about this claim. He said the former owner of J Ltd, E, had been made aware of the claim, but is currently overseas. The hearing went ahead without J Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Did GU, by his negligen...

7. SM v KK [2024] NZDT 428 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...of any duty owed to KK. 13. This means that KK is liable to pay the loss suffered by SM as a result of the incident and KK’s counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: R Merrett Date: 17 May 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. BI & FF v LH [2025] NZDT 65 (27 February 2025) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...police traffic crash report produced at the time of the collision shows the truck on the same side of the road as FF, FF said she did not give a description to the police at the time as she had been injured in the collision and was not sure where that information had come from. 8. As discussed in the hearing, even if FF’s car was travelling close behind the truck, LH must have started his right hand turn before the truck had completely passed him in order to collide with FF. That...

9. OX v QT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1671 (16 August 2021) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...evidence presented OX’s vehicle was parked in the carpark for no more than 5-10 minutes. I find the $95.00 he has paid is more than sufficient compensation. Was OX a party to a contract in parking where he did? 8. A legally binding contract is formed where both parties intend to contract on agreed terms. For a contract to be enforceable the terms of the contract need to be certain and clear. 9. QT’s letter infers there was a contract between the parties. The letter states...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 77 Halse v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...resolves an application by the first plaintiff, Mr Halse, for judgment by default against the defendant, the Hamilton City Council. The application is made on the ground that the Hamilton City Council has failed to file a statement of claim. [2] For the reasons explained, Mr Halse’s application is dismissed. It could have been struck out. Mr Halse challenges a determination of the Authority [3] Mr Halse is dissatisfied with a determination of the Employment Relations...