Search Results

1. BL v E Ltd & UFH Ltd [2024] NZDT 655 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312810#DLM312810 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312813#DLM312813 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312816#DLM312816 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was n...

2. WT v DX [2024] NZDT 796 (26 November 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...recoverable? 17. In the absence of any representations made about N’s health, the purchase is a situation of “buyer beware” and costs are unable to be awarded. Referee: CD Bennett Date: 26 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. CU & OU v DX & Ors [2024] NZDT 790 (28 September 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Council drainage system. In this situation I make the observation that such an easement is a right to drain stormwater and is not an obligation to do so. Referee: C Murphy Date: 28 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. DT & Ors v MU [2025] NZDT 1 (17 January 2025) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...abnormalities of the supraspinous ligament, lumbar facet joints or dorsal sacral ligaments, which would indicate that the condition was not caused by falling after rearing. d) MU has presented a considerable amount of evidence of [Racehorse] performing well at equestrian events prior to sale and I accept there was no indication of poor behaviour indicating back pain. It is unfortunate that [Racehorse] appears to have had a latent condition that only became evident after the sale. The ve...

5. TUW & TJW v TX & HL [2024] NZDT 358 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...chattels to go with the property. Both parties agreed the gate was not listed as a chattel. Conclusion 8. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 10 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. Family-Fixed-Fees-Schedules-July-2020-Updated-18-December-2023.pdf [pdf, 473 KB]

   ...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity Fe...

7. LCRO 174/2018 GL v TE (18 June 2020) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...concerns” about the trust. [14] Mr GL subsequently raised queries about the deductions made by Mr BT from the sale proceeds of his [suburb b] property. He queried the exchange rate. He said $32,297.07 was owed to him by the trust. He requested a breakdown of $52,650 deducted for “legal and administrative costs”.6 Complaint [15] Mr GL lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service (LCS) on 26 March 2018 on which he elaborated in subsequent communications to t...

8. Beattie v Porirua City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 14 [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...adjudication proceedings (1) The tribunal may do any or all of the following things in relation to adjudication proceedings or the parties to them: (a) conduct the proceedings in any manner it thinks fit, including adopting processes that enable it to perform an investigative role: (2) The tribunal also has the powers specified in Part 2 of Schedule 3. [6] The Tribunal can hear this claim against the sixth respondent pursuant to these statutory provisions. [7] The matte...

9. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...house passes its final inspection at first attempt the date upon which the owner sought the final inspection could generally be regarded as the appropriate built-by date. The difficulty in the current case is that we do not know when the owners requested the final inspection as that documentation is no longer part of the available records. On behalf of the chief executive, it was concluded that that was more likely than not prior to Friday 5 November 1999 given the fact that the f...

10. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...house passes its final inspection at first attempt the date upon which the owner sought the final inspection could generally be regarded as the appropriate built-by date. The difficulty in the current case is that we do not know when the owners requested the final inspection as that documentation is no longer part of the available records. On behalf of the chief executive, it was concluded that that was more likely than not prior to Friday 5 November 1999 given the fact that the f...