12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 698 APPLICANT MU RESPONDENT OL The Tribunal orders: The claim by MU against OL is proved. OL is to pay MU the sum of $4,847.25 on or by 5:00 pm on 20 January 2024. Reasons 1. On 15 July 2023, in the [Suburb] shops carpark OL backed his car into the side of MU’s car causing damage. 2. Both MU and OL were sent a “notice of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 512 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NM booked two return tickets for his children to [Country] travelling on 19 December 2023 and returning to New Zealand on 13 January 2024 with [Airline]. U Ltd, through whom NM had bought his tickets, contacted him to advise o...
...amount on completion of the further work by the solicitor. 6. In total, F Ltd invoiced $11,083.65 for work done for YM’s court case. YM has paid $5400.00 towards the invoiced amounts plus the $1800.00 paid on her behalf by her solicitor. She requests a declaration of non-liability for the balance of $3883.65. 7. F Ltd counter-claims for payment of the balance of $3883.65 plus debt collection costs incurred of $2323.07. F Ltd sent the outstanding amount to debt collection in No...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 350 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT KB The Tribunal orders: KB is ordered to pay MN the sum of $3,100.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 28 August 2023. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent, and the hearing proceeded in her absence. On 30 December 2022, the applicant lent the respondent the sum of...
1 [2015] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 46: ARTHUR SMETHURST – POHUTUKAWA AVENUE, OHOPE ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Procedural Background [1] By letter dated 24 February 2015 Mr Smethurst wrote to the chair of the Weathertight Homes Tribunal seeking a review of his...
...terms were so unclear I would have found that agreement unenforceable. 16. For the above reasons I award no interest on the base debt for the period of the loan being drawn down until the date it was due to be repaid. The Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 17. The Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 applies to this dispute. The primary purpose of this Act is to provide for the awards of interest as compensation for a delay in the payment of debts, damages, and other money claims in...
...November 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 18 January 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] This case involves an allegation by Tiara Williams that the Department of Corrections (Corrections) did not respond properly to her request for personal information and so interfered with her privacy. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Williams v Attorney-General [2024] NZHRRT 1.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 1 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] The events...
...District Court - [2022] NZDT 121 APPLICANT GN APPLICANT GO RESPONDENT LQ Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Power Company U The Tribunal orders: 1. LQ Ltd to pay GN and GO $2,965.04 by 20 September 2022. 2. The Applicants claim against Power Company U is not proven and therefore dismissed. Reasons. The claim 1. The Applicants purchased a property from LQ Ltd on the 16 May 2021 pursuant to Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated 2 July 2020. When the...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) AMENDED INTERIM ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1596 APPLICANT KS APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT TI SECOND RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. This order amends my order of 18 March 2020 to allow for the affect of timing caused by COVID 19. 2. TI & ND are to remove any and all changes they have made to the boundary fence including any