Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...application to remove the matter into the Court for hearing and determination. The Authority granted that application on 7 December 20071. [5] In the Court, the matter initially proceeded in the usual way. On 24 January 2008, a statement of claim was filed. A statement of defence was filed on 26 February 2008. I then held a telephone conference with counsel on 10 April 2008, the outcomes of which were recorded in a minute issued the following day. The plaintiff was directed t...

2. N Ltd v O Ltd [2022] NZDT 245 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 137 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 245 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay $2,630.32 to N Ltd by 15 December 2022. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. O Ltd contracted with N Ltd for freight services for live paua to China. The paua was transported by B Ltd. However before arriving in China the ai...

3. GT & AI v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 537 (2 October 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 537 APPLICANT GT APPLICANT AI RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On 18 October 2021, AI and GT entered into an Agreement for Sale and Purchase to buy Lot X in a proposed new subdivision at [Address] from F Ltd. Settlement Date was to be 10 working days after the Vendor’s So...

4. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ..._________________________________________________________________________ First Middle Surname Second Plaintiff _________________________________________________________________________ (if applicable) First Middle Surname Third Plaintiff _____________________________________________...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 25 Air New Zealand Ltd v Milne [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...KATHLEEN MILNE NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 25 [20 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 25 ARC 17/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant AND KATHLEEN MILNE Respondent Judgment: 20 February 2012 INTERLOCUTOR...

6. LT v TU Ltd NZDT 1363 (4 December 2019) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1363 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT TU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms T parked in a visitor’s parking space at a residential complex where she was looking after a friend’s child, in excess of the stated time limit of two hours. TU Ltd, as an authorised agent of the owner...

7. DK Ltd v UT [2024] NZDT 338 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 338 APPLICANT DK Ltd RESPONDENT UT C/- QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) The sole director of the applicant company, DK Ltd is, according to the companies register, TN. [At the hearing, TN suggested others were also directors. That is not indicated by the companies register]. TN says that in 2018 his mo...

8. SB Ltd v D Ltd [2021] NZDT 1686 (8 December 2021) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Ltd in smaller amounts on receipt of a purchase order until a new blanket order was required. In the past D Ltd’s account manager had contacted SB Ltd to let them know when a new blanket order was required. 3. In November 2019 a blanket order form had been signed by SB Ltd for around 5 pallets, which, based on usual usage, was expected to last until around December 2020 – in fact it lasted until March 2021 when the last of the jars was supplied to SB Ltd. At that time, D Ltd did n...

9. SX v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 160 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 160 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: SX’s claim against S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The respondent provided monthly software services to the applicant at the cost of US$6.90 per month from January 2021. In August 2022, the cost of these services rose to US$69.00 per month. The applicant w...

10. NL v KS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1477 (21 August 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1477 APPLICANT NL RESPONDENT KS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Council APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: KS Ltd is to pay B Ltd $3,311.40 by Wednesday 16 September 2020. Reasons 1. A truck owned KS Ltd was being driven down [Road 1] in [Suburb] when it s...