Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12924 items matching your search terms

  1. HG Trust v LM Ltd [2023] NZDT 590 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

    Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 590 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ZA as trustee for HG Trust RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against LM Limited Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order 14 August 2023 of stands. Reasons for decision: 1. TC appeared as a presentative of LM Ltd. 2. TC is seeking...

  2. UO v HE [2022] NZDT 189 (12 October 2022) [pdf, 109 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 189 APPLICANT UO RESPONDENT HE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The Applicant purchased a second-hand washing machine from the Respondent via Trade Me on 19 May 2022 for $306.10 and collected the machine on 28 May 2022. 2. The Applicant used the machine regularly without issue until 29...

  3. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 145 [pdf, 185 KB]

    PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPLICANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPLICANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 145 ACR 253/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN DN Applicant AN...

  4. FD Ltd v FT [2021] NZDT 1577 (20 July 2021) [pdf, 216 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1577 APPLICANT FD Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT FT SECOND RESPONDENT CR Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. CR Ltd is to pay FD Ltd $30,000 on or before 5.00pm on 11 August 2021. Reasons: 1. In October 2020, CR Ltd approached FD Ltd to engage several of its music artists to perform at a Festival event in Febr...

  5. Moore - Waitara East Section 81 B [2018] Chief Judge's MB 842 (2018 CJ 842) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...AOTEA DISTRICT A20180006300 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Māori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Waitara East Section 81 B (Rohutu) and a decision of the Registrar to refuse applications for filing BETWEEN Kevin Moore Applicant Appearances: G Sharrock for the applicant Judgment: 30 November 2018 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC Copies to: Gerald Sharrock, Rightlaw Limited, 11 Kahui Street,...

  6. UM v BD [2024] NZDT 699 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 699 APPLICANT UM RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: BD are to pay UM the sum of $1293.71 by no later than 20 January 2025. Reasons: 1. UM hired a car from BD on 28 July 2024. UM paid the 20 day rental fee of $1481.80, which included a zero excess, in advance. 2. Within approximately 5 minutes of driving the vehi...

  7. [2023] NZEmpC 77 Halse v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...resolves an application by the first plaintiff, Mr Halse, for judgment by default against the defendant, the Hamilton City Council. The application is made on the ground that the Hamilton City Council has failed to file a statement of claim. [2] For the reasons explained, Mr Halse’s application is dismissed. It could have been struck out. Mr Halse challenges a determination of the Authority [3] Mr Halse is dissatisfied with a determination of the Employment Relations...

  8. KT v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 632 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 632 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd pay KT $214.50 on or before 22 December 2023. KT is to return the lockset on receipt of the refund. Reasons 1. KT purchased a fender and lockset from D Ltd for $429.00 being parts from a [car]. KT says that the parts he purchased are not of acceptable quality. He claim...

  9. DC v NL [2024] NZDT 263 (25 January 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 263 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT NL The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the respondent is amended to NL and HI in partnership trading as NC, to reflect the correct legal entity. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC requested that NL provide a full balayage (technique of foils and bleach). It was agreed that the price would be $...