12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 604 APPLICANT GB RESPONDENT B Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT PD The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd and PD, jointly and severally are to pay GB the sum of $6,637.96 on or before 14 June 2024. 2. The counter claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GB was driving on [Road], and PD, who...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 222 APPLICANT ZM RESPONDENT TU THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT D Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 12 January 2023, there was a collision on [road] near a corner between the [car] drive...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 56 BETWEEN ABQ APPLICANT AND ABR Ltd APPLICANT’S INSURER AND ZYO Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 5 June 2013 Referee: Referee Lang ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 25 November 2012, ABQ had parked his car on the side of the road. The driver of a campervan, [registration number], revers...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 830 BETWEEN DC APPLICANT AND WX RESPONDENT Date of Order: 9 June 2015 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out and the counter claim is dismissed. Facts [1] DC and WX are neighbours. Their properties were surveyed in 2007 or 2008 when subdivided by the previous owner. In 2011, WX had his driveway tar sealed. In A...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 447 APPLICANT OC RESPONDENT OQ Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER [Insurance company] The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. OC contracted OQ Ltd on 27 December 2022 to collect and transport a boat and trailer from [City 1] to [City 2] for a prepaid fee of $1,400.00. 2. OQ...
...was adjudicated bankrupt. 3. The Insolvency Act 2006 relevantly provides: 76 Effect of adjudication on court proceedings (1) On adjudication, all proceedings to recover any debt provable in the bankruptcy are halted. (2) However, on the application by any creditor or other person interested in the bankruptcy, the court may allow proceedings that had already begun before the date of adjudication to continue on the terms and conditions that the court thinks appropriate. 4. I...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 14 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. On 17 July 29021 BL’s car was towed by BU Ltd. To recover the car BL paid $429.24. He believes the amount charged was unreasonable and there was no signage that his car was parked on private property or in a tow away zone. He...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 724 APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. L Ltd is added as a respondent to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NT parked his car in a carpark owned and operated by L Ltd. As the ticketing machine was broken, NT needed to pay for his parking through the parking app,...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 769 BETWEEN BM LIMITED APPLICANT AND YN RESPONDENT Date of Order: 23 February 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that YN is to pay BM Limited the sum of $1,727.98 with payment to be made by 5pm on Monday 16 March 2015. Reasons [1] In mid-2012 ABC Limited (“ABC”) undertook remedial building, plumbing and tiling work to the bathroom...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 363 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. The counterclaim is struck out. Reasons 1. The Respondent, M Ltd, operated by LM, conducts a business selling both new and pre-loved bridal dresses through “popup” events. Prospective buyers register for the events booking one hour fitting appointments...