12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1684 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT KO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. DD is to remain in the possession of KO. Reasons: 1. TD claims her former neighbour, KO, gifted her a young cat named D on 8/6/2021 in the course of a telephone conversation. Following the conversation, TD took the cat to the vet, had...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 38 APPLICANT WD RESPONDENT NU SECOND RESPONDENT OT The Tribunal orders: NU and OT are jointly and severally liable to pay WD the sum of $1040.00 by no later than 23 February 2024. Reasons: 1. WD was a flatmate in a house rented by NU and OT. When entering the flat in November 2020, WD paid a bond of $800....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1660 APPLICANTS HI and UI c/ the Trust AND APPLICANT LN c/ the Trust APPLICANT BJ Limited RESPONDENT QD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT DU THIRD RESPONDENT HS Limited The Tribunal orders: BJ Limited is joined as an applicant to the claim. The claims are dismissed. Reaso...
...were required to comply with the IPPs prescribed in the PA and to apply the relevant provisions the PA. Accordingly, references in this decision are to the relevant sections of the 1993 Act, unless otherwise specified. 3 Mr Cheng’s statement of claim dated 25 March 2021 at paragraphs 2 to 4. 4 Due to the imprecise nature of the pleadings, by memorandum dated 2 August 2024 these issues were proposed by Corrections, not objected to by Mr Cheng and are adopted by the Tribunal. 3 [5....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 749 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This is a claim for the sum of $3,299.01 for a refund of a N Ltd stainless steel [gas cooktop]. 2. I note that a hearing took place on 7 August 2024 and was adjourned to allow for a N Ltd technician to visit the applicant’s premises t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 639 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT CU APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BU and CU were involved in an accident in the carpark at the [shop] in [City] on 25 January 2023. 2. Both drivers were attempting to exit the car park. 3. BU was parked in an...
...week of every month. In this issue ... External Customer Survey November 2015 Text Messaging Legal Services (Quality Assurance) Amendment Regulations 2015 Historic Abuse Cases (HAC) – User Charge Exemption for pre-1 July 1993 Matters Application to Cancel a Sentence of Imprisonment and Substitute Home Detention Legal Aid fees available for Restorative Justice Criminal Case Assignment Christmas and New Year availability Queries External Customer Survey November 201...
...$681.69 to be ‘awardable’ legal costs (75% of the first invoice, all of the second invoice and a nominal $40 of the third invoice). 13. In the circumstances, I consider an award of interest to be appropriate and under the Interest on Money Claims Act 2016, interest on the paid amount, factoring in the repayments made over time, comes to $906.26. 14. The total amount TO is liable to pay to the applicants is $8287.95. Referee Perfect Date: 21 May 2024 Page 3 of 3...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 575 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT TB The Tribunal orders: TC is to pay TB the amount of $195.50 on or before 5 December 2023. Reason 1. The dispute is over collection and installation of a television TB was engaged to do for TC and whether the work was completed. TC is claiming $209.37 for her time and travel to deal with this; TB is claimin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 554 APPLICANT L Foundation RESPONDENT OS The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for the return of two horses is struck out. 2. The hearing is adjourned. The parties will be notified of the date and time of the new hearing. 3. The parties may submit any additional evidence by email to [the Disputes Tribunal] using reference [file nu...