Search Results

1. T Ltd v MC [2023] NZDT 614 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...accommodation arrangement is or is not a residential tenancy or boarding house arrangement. T Ltd was given until 24 July 2023 to provide confirmation from the Tenancy Tribunal as to the nature of the arrangement. 4. T Ltd did not provide any information in the Disputes Tribunal before 24 July and the matter was set down for further hearing in front of me.1 DI advised at the second hearing that he had contacted Tenancy Services after the previous hearing and was told this was not a mat...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 115 Muldoon v Nelson Marlborough DHB supplementary [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...live applications before the Court, it, as in the case of other courts, is empowered to recall its judgments to correct slips or omissions. Failure to deal with an issue raised in the proceeding or, more particularly as in this case, to grant a form of relief claimed, is a classic example of the appropriate exercise of such a power. If the Court has overlooked doing something it ought to have addressed, then it is only just that there should be a procedure to enable that to be consi...

3. BORA Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...The Bill 4. The Bill repeals and replaces the Equal Pay Act 1972 and the Government Service Equal Pay Act 1960. It also makes amendments to the Employment Relations Act 2000. 5. The purpose of the Bill is to: a. promote enduring settlement of claims regarding sex discrimination on pay equity grounds b. provide for the elimination of existing and prevention of future sex discrimination in remuneration and other terms and conditions of employment c. set out the different processes...

4. TE v OL [2024] NZDT 458 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 458 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT OL The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks compensation following the purchase of a vehicle, a [vehicle] from the respondent in March 2024. The applica...

5. HG v HN Ltd [2019] NZDT 1471 (28 August 2019) [pdf, 133 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1471 APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT HN Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: HN Ltd is to pay HG the sum of $137.61 on or before 18 September 2019. Reasons: 1. HN Ltd is contracted by IO to provide services including lawnmowing and weed eating for a number of its properties. HG is a resident at one such property. HG brings a claim ag...

6. BN & HH v KT & BB [2023] NZDT 402 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: The claim by BN and HH against HT and BB is partially proved. HT and BB are jointly and severally liable and are to pay BN and HH a total of $500.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 14 September 2023. Reasons 1. The applicants BN and HH (the applicants) purchased a house from HT and BB (the respondents). The applicants now bring a claim against the respondents for $10,613.30. 2. The applicants claim that the Sale and Purchase Agreement (the agreement) did...

7. What happens next

   ...and want to dispute the sale – you’ll need to go through the Disputes Tribunal. Disputes Tribunal If you’re making a claim against a registered trader or from a trader that meets the criteria for registration but isn’t, we can register your application when we receive it. Notifying the trader We send a copy of your claim and a notice to the trader that tells them to talk to you about the application within 14 days of receiving the notice (unless the adjudicator changes the date). The t...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal

8. Determining eligibility for wrongful conviction and imprisonment compensation [pdf, 260 KB]

   Compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonmentCompensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment Process for determining eligibility and quantum of compensation Conviction set aside or quashed Applicant writes to Minister of Justice seeking compensation Minister seeks advice of Ministry of Justice Eligible for consideration under Cabinet guidelines Ministry advises Minister whether claim “merits further assessment” Advice is YES, Minister appoints QC to assess the cla...

9. Holmes v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...dated 22 August and respond to your queries: Your letter of 27 July claimed that you were denied extra help, namely TAS, on 13 October 2009. You did not apply for TAS or provide information to enable a grant to be considered. Mr Rakiraki has since requested that you apply for this Temporary Additional Support. To date, no application has been received. [20] It is to be noted that Ms Dixon wrote to Mr Holmes within two working days of receipt, well inside the statutory time limit bu...

10. DU v BL & KL [2021] NZDT 1685 (28 May 2021) [pdf, 181 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1685 APPLICANT DU RESPONDENT BL SECOND RESPONDENT KL The Tribunal orders: The claim by DU against BL and KL is dismissed. Reasons 1. On or about 12 February 2021 DU purchased a property at [address] (“the property”) from BL and KL. The purchase price included a dishwasher. DU claims that the dishwa...