13202 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 807 APPLICANT CO RESPONDENT KY SECOND RESPONDENT MN THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. MN is struck off this claim. Reasons 1. CO claims she is entitled to commission on a property sale because she says she showed her clients the property before G L...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1441 APPLICANT DG Ltd RESPONDENT ID Ltd The Tribunal orders: DG Ltd is to pay ID Ltd $300.00 on or before 15 September 2020. Reasons 1. On or about 13 March 2020, ID Ltd had been engaged to do work by a neighbouring property owner to the property occupied by DG Ltd. On the morning before starting the work, ID...
...REPRESENTATION: Mr SJ Fraser for plaintiff Mr S McCusker and Ms VM Rea for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 July 2022 DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] In July 2019, while Mr Gorgus was in custody, he made two requests for certain specified personal information to the Chief Executive, Department of Corrections (“Corrections”). He made a third request for information in October 2019 to a lawyer acting for Corrections. 1 [This decision...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 735 APPLICANTS BM and FM RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent is changed from O Ltd to W Ltd. 2. W Ltd is to pay $2,506.46 to BM and FM by 31 January 2024. 3. The evidence provided by W Ltd in the document ‘Information and Submissions’ received by the [City 1] District Court on 1 December 2023 and provided to the Tribunal in the hearing of 19 Decembe
...the age and residence requirements. However, he is married and that is a factor that can affect his entitlement. He accepts that as he is married he is only entitled to New Zealand Superannuation paid at half the married rate. [2] Part of the application process required by the Chief Executive is that applicants must submit information relating to their spouse. The Appellant submitted his application, which included a good deal of information regarding his wife. It included her n...
...[2024] NZLCRO 024 Ref: LCRO 149/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HV Applicant AND BQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 449 APPLICANT DB Limited RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay DB Limited the sum of $776.00 on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons 1. DB Limited (the Motel) run a motel at [town]. Under the Education and Training Act 2020, the board of a school is a body corporate and therefore the legal embodiment of the school....
...order for discovery of certain documents in the possession or power of Violet Sade. Ms Sade opposes any such order. The issue for determination is whether an order for discovery should be granted. Background [2] Mr Mahanga has filed substantive applications seeking: (a) An injunction preventing Tahi Estate Ltd (“Tahi”) from conducting business on the Horahora 1A1, Horahora 1A3B and the Horahora 1A4C blocks (“the Horahora blocks”); and (b) Compensation from Ms Sade and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 460 APPLICANT TQ and MQ RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: H Ltd is to pay the sum of $19,355.88 to TQ and MQ, as trustees of the TQ Trust, by no later than 19 July 2024. Reasons: 1. On 19 December 2020, the Applicant entered into an Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate with H Ltd to buy a section at [address]. The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 352 APPLICANT LW RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LW was introduced to law firm N Ltd by a real estate agent via email on 2 January 2024. The real estate agent wrote that LW, [a foreign national], was looking to gain some understanding around his ability to purchase property in Ne...