Search Results

1. BS v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 168 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...haul out the boat in June and fit the wooden plank, however, after some consideration BS decided not to go through with the job because he had decided to sell the boat. 5. BS submitted that he should not have to pay for the four years of storage claimed by O Ltd. 6. NX representing O Ltd explained that in 2020 Covid 19 resulted in O Ltd being shut down for about six months. 7. NX said that at any time BS could have had his boat hauled out by another company. NX said O Ltd invo...

2. TK v BD & TT Ltd [2024] NZDT 530 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 530 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) TK RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) BD SECOND RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. TK’s claim against TT Ltd is struck out. B. TK’s claim against BD is dismissed. C. BD’s claim against TK is dismissed. Reasons 1. In an email to the Tribunal...

3. BU v SI Ltd [2015] NZDT 1460 (10 September 2015) [pdf, 183 KB]

   Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1460 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT SI Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER AB Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER CD Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The applicant’s address is changed to [Redacted]. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 10 January 2014 on State Highway 24 north of Te Poi, a Land Rover Discovery, own...

4. KG v TQ [2023] NZDT 789 (22 December 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 789 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ is to pay KG the sum of $1,150.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In March 2023 KG engaged TQ to prune and shape some trees. He carried out the work and then the parties discussed two other trees on her property that may need removing. TQ asked for $750.00 in ad...

5. KD v NG Ltd [2023] NZDT 362 (18 July 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 362 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT NG Ltd The Tribunal orders: NG Ltd is to pay KD the sum of $3,417.97 on or before 1 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In August 2021 KD went to NG Ltd to get some vinyl planking for his floor. NG Ltd’s representative, Mr L, did a site visit and measured the area, and pointed out some work t...

6. Q Ltd v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 755 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 755 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. Q Ltd is to pay T Ltd costs of $360.00 by 22 December 2023. Reasons 1. The dispute relates to work that Q Ltd (KC) carried out for a client of T Ltd in November 2021. 2. KC’s written claim states that: T Ltd contacted me to go about...

7. XH v ND [2024] NZDT 300 (20 May 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 300 APPLICANT XH RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. XH allowed ND to use his driveway so that ND could relocate a house onto his section. The use of the driveway was conditional on any damage caused would be fixed by ND. 2. XH claims $12,132.00 due to a water pipe leak he claims was...

8. OT v UB [2024] NZDT 817 (11 November 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 817 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT UB The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed. Reasons 1. On 29 April 2024, the applicant purchased a [camper van] from the respondent for $30,000.00. 2. He is now claiming reimbursement of the $30,000.00 purchase price. Background 3. The vehicle had been advertised [online]on Trade Me for $35K....

9. SI & XQ v G Ltd [2022] NZDT 40 (14 February 2022) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...Court [2022] NZDT 40 APPLICANT SI APPLICANT XQ RESPONDENT G Limited The Tribunal orders: G Limited is to pay SI and XQ $2722.13. on or before Monday 7 March 2022. Reasons: 1. In January 2019, SI and XQ (the Applicants) booked a band through G Limited (G) for their wedding reception on 3 April 2020 for 100 guests at [Location]. The full fee of $5754.26 was paid after the initial deposit of $2872.13. On 15 March 2020, following the Government annou...

10. HT v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 616 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 616 APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. K Ltd is liable to pay HT the sum of $599.00. As this amount has already been paid, no further payment is required. 2. K Ltd is to collect the freezer from HT’s property at their own cost by no later than 4 October 2024 at a time to be mutually arranged. Reasons:...