12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 317 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT TD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] BE bought a [car] from TD Ltd, represented by Ms C. BE considers that it is defective, and claims a refund and/or compensation from TD Ltd. [2] Both parties provided written submissions, in which they set out their respective...
...[2024] NZLCRO 090 Ref: LCRO 52/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN AD Applicant AND OC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr AD, has applied for review of a decision of the [Area] Standar...
...leased to BC for her daughter to ride at a 3 day horse camp from 19-21 April. Over this period BC had the horse insured. On 23 April BQ retrieved [the horse] and claimed that she was lame. On 28 April BC decided not to proceed with the purchase and requested a refund. 2. BC claims $12,250.00 for the purchase price and the Disputes Tribunal fee. 3. BQ counter claims $8,000.00 for the reduced value of [the horse]. 4. The issues to be determined are: a. What were the terms...
...adjournment. Ms Subritzky opposed the adjournment. I decided it was appropriate to grant the adjournment and I adjourned the application to the November sitting of the Court. [4] On 9 October 2013 Ms Subritzky contacted the Court staff by email and requested that the application be withdrawn. She explained that she had brought the application on behalf of her uncle, Joe Allman, who had since passed away. [5] On 20 November 2013 the application was called in Court. The parties ha...
[bookmark: _GoBack]Guidance on Using the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim Template About the statement of defence and counterclaim [bookmark: Purpose]Use this form if you have been served with a claim in the District Court, and you wish to both defend the claim AND counterclaim against the plaintiff. You must file in the court and serve on the plaintiff a Statement of Defence and Counterclaim within the timeframe specified on the notice of proceedings. This is usually within 25 working day...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 262 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT MG The Tribunal orders: 1. MG is to pay BE $19,000.00 on or before 11 July 2023. 2. The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In April 2022, BE and MG entered into a loan agreement where MG borrowed $29,000 from BE to purchase a [car] registration [number...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 391 APPLICANT DC APPLICANT IC RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. J Ltd is to remove the posts and corrugated iron fencing that were added to the original boundary fence at the front of the adjoining properties on or before 12 July 2024. 2. If the original boundary fence is damaged in the removal of the posts and corrug
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 179 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT X Inc The Tribunal orders: The claim by TD against X Inc is dismissed. Reasons 1. TD was a member of X Inc for a number of years. TD now brings a claim against X Inc for $4000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Was there a contract between TD and X Inc? (b) If so, did X Inc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1513 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT EN SECOND RESPONDENT LK THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT D Limited THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT E Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: D Limited is to pay MD $5,615.75 on or before Monday 26 August 2019. Reasons: [1] MD purchased from D Limited (D...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 78 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT BE The Tribunal orders: T Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BE was previously a shareholder, director and also employed by T Ltd. Relations broke down between the parties in approximately 2014/2015, which resulted in litigation in both the High Court and in the employment arena. These matters ha...