12935 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 177 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay to Q Ltd the sum of $95.00 on or before 2 May 2024. 2. N Ltd is not liable to pay any further amount to Q Ltd, or any debt collection companies engaged by Q Ltd in relation to parking breach number [redacted] dated 15 April 2023 which is the subject of...
...that day, however I accept that it was within TD’s sole right to decide whether or not to sell the puppy to NN as this was one of the conditions to the contract and cancel the contract. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to Mr NN? 9. NN claimed for the return of his deposit and for the costs he incurred in visiting TD’s puppy and for securing a new puppy. Aside from the deposit of $500.00, none of the other costs or losses were evidenced. In any event as there has been no br...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 337 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: NU is to return the [car] to BG on or before Monday 31 July 2023; and The vehicle is to be returned c/- [address] at a time to be mutually agreed with BG via text or messenger; and NU is to pay $120.00 to BG for a fine incurred by him in February 2023 (and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1496 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT LD The Tribunal hereby orders: LD is to pay the sum of $500.00 to KH on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. Reasons: 1. In June 2018, KH contacted LD, who had advertised on Facebook as a dog breeder. LD said that there would be a litter of [breed] puppies available in July 2018 for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 530 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) TK RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) BD SECOND RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. TK’s claim against TT Ltd is struck out. B. TK’s claim against BD is dismissed. C. BD’s claim against TK is dismissed. Reasons 1. In an email to the Tribunal...
...haul out the boat in June and fit the wooden plank, however, after some consideration BS decided not to go through with the job because he had decided to sell the boat. 5. BS submitted that he should not have to pay for the four years of storage claimed by O Ltd. 6. NX representing O Ltd explained that in 2020 Covid 19 resulted in O Ltd being shut down for about six months. 7. NX said that at any time BS could have had his boat hauled out by another company. NX said O Ltd invo...
...The complainant says: [2.1] She and her family had to apply for a work visa, and related visas. They had been in New Zealand for a period and their visas would expire in the relatively near future. [2.2] Mr Ahuja accepted instructions to lodge the application for the family. [2.3] He prepared the application, and it was defective. Either Mr Ahuja or someone in his practice filed the defective application. [2.4] Immigration New Zealand returned the application and identified what was r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 755 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. Q Ltd is to pay T Ltd costs of $360.00 by 22 December 2023. Reasons 1. The dispute relates to work that Q Ltd (KC) carried out for a client of T Ltd in November 2021. 2. KC’s written claim states that: T Ltd contacted me to go about...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2015] NZDT 1460 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT SI Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER AB Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER CD Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The applicant’s address is changed to [Redacted]. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 10 January 2014 on State Highway 24 north of Te Poi, a Land Rover Discovery, own...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 789 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT TQ The Tribunal orders: TQ is to pay KG the sum of $1,150.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In March 2023 KG engaged TQ to prune and shape some trees. He carried out the work and then the parties discussed two other trees on her property that may need removing. TQ asked for $750.00 in ad...