Search Results

1. O Ltd v U Ltd & Z Ltd [2023] NZDT 655 (5 December 2023) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...obliged to provide the truck to O Ltd in any particular condition. It was only obliged to provide a vehicle with a current COF. 1 Section 137(1) CCLA 2 Section 24 CCLA CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 22. Therefore, the issues that form the basis for O Ltd’s claim for compensation on the grounds of mistake, are the issues that were present when Z Ltd [Town] carried out its COF inspection and that were issues that Z Ltd [Town] should have failed. 23. At the hearing...

2. B Ltd v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 564 (9 August 2024) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...compensation of $20,273.00. I note that as B Ltd has elected not to ask for a full refund, it is permitted to keep the van, and may opt to dispose of it or repair it. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 9 August 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. TQ v LX [2021] NZDT 1421 (1 April 2021) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...These costs must be reasonable, foreseeable, established and consistent with the damage caused. 8. TQ provided evidence to the Tribunal of the veterinary costs for B’s care that she claimed she has incurred as a result of N attacking B in the form of itemised invoices. These costs amount to $14,335.57. 9. TQ also provided evidence from one of the veterinarians who treated B that B had no pre- existing conditions that complicated the treatment he received as a result of the attack...

4. OT v KC & ZX [2023] NZDT 693 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...discovered the camera was not in the box, but another item was. 3. OT seeks $330.00 the amount paid for the camera and its postage. 4. In the process of KC being served the claim, ZX contacted the Tribunal identifying himself as the son of KC. He informed that KC had died and produced a death certificate. He further informed the Tribunal that he was the person that had completed the camera auction on [the online platform] using his mother’s account. He is the identifiable and connect...

5. OT v C Ltd [2025] NZDT 99 (9 May 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 99 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT C Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER U Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS 1. At about 3.15 p.m. on 14 January 2025 OT was driving along the road between [Street 1] and [Street 2], heading home to [Street 2]. At or near the roundabout of [Street 3/ Street 4] intersection, the paintwork and...

6. Q Ltd v U Ltd & R Ltd [2023] NZDT 683 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...determine the claim. The matter is therefore struck out (and would otherwise have been dismissed as the applicant did not attend the hearing to present their claim). Referee Perfect Date: 12 December 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 172 Twentyman v The Warehouse Ltd [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...June 2016 (heard in Rotorua) Appearances: Plaintiff in person P Swarbrick and M McGoldrick, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 20 December 2016 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH Introduction [1] Ms Barbara Twentyman claims to have personal grievances against The Warehouse Limited (TWL), arising from two incidents she says occurred at work; a shoulder injury sustained while handling a heavy packing case and other health problems caused by inhaling concr...

8. Wilson v Welch [pdf, 53 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Claim No: 04734 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an Adjudication BETWEEN NEVILLE WILLIAM WILSON and PAUL CECIL WASHER as TRUSTEES for THE NEVILLE WILSON FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PAUL WELCH and SUZANNE WELCH First Respondents AND ROBIN BAILLIE (Removed) Second Respondent AND GRANT KNOWLES Third Respondent AND GIANNI MARCHESAN Fourth Respondent AND GRAEME JOHNSON (N...

9. TT v BF & Ors [2023] NZDT 147 (22 March 2023) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...after TT took back the keys to the house. 6. The Management Agreement also states clearly (second page, second column, first paragraph) that “We (TT’) indemnify the agent against all actions, claims and costs arising out of the proper performance of the agents duties as the property manager or the exercise of any powers duties or authorities contained in this management authority” 7. Based on the evidence put before me which included detailed photographic evidence, and...

10. BU v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 158 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...intention as to the future. 7. BU claims that when he first asked about the car, he did advise that he had a large family, including five kids and needed a big family car. He recalls asking if the car was a seven seater. 8. BU presented the LTSA information that came with the car, which stated interior was a 7 seater. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 9. Mr Q said that at no point during the presale did BU ask about the car’s seating capacity, that is whether it is a fiv...