Search Results

1. Osborne - Tatawai Claim No 3 (2005) 110 South Island MB 136 (110 SI 136) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...4 March 2005 A20040005105 Tatawai Claim No 3 - Confirm Final List of Beneficiaries and Summon Meeting of Owners 18(1 )(a)/93, 173/93 Robert Alexander Osborne RESERVED DECISION The present case arises under section 345 of The Ngai Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998. Under that section, the Maori Land Court has jurisdiction for the purposes of attachment 14.2 of the deed of settlement to confirm the list of beneficiaries of ancillary claims, and hear and determine objections to the...

2. MacGregor v Craig [2016] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...After Ms MacGregor lodged the sexual harassment claim the interest rate was increased by Mr Craig to 29%. [20] Ms MacGregor’s sudden resignation on 18 September 2014 followed a discussion between her and Mr Craig. One aspect of that discussion formed part of her sexual harassment claim while another related to what Ms MacGregor believed was Mr Craig’s refusal to talk about her rate of pay. Mr Craig’s view was that Ms MacGregor had no entitlement to an increase and in any case a...

3. Form-210-Application-for-eviction-warrant-FINAL-9-December-2024.pdf [pdf, 387 KB]

   MOJ210/10/23 Ministry of Justice Collections Unit www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ 0800 233 222 PAGE 1 OF 12 When should I use this form? Use this form if the following applies: • you have a Tenancy Tribunal order saying that possession of residential premises is to be returned to you by a specified date but the respondent has not yet done this, or • you have a Tenancy Tribunal order or Mediator’s order saying that possession of a residential premises is to be returned t...

4. Mahanga v Sade - Horahora 1A1 (2017) 148 Taitokerau MB 237 (148 TTK 237) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...Dickson Transport subsequently filed proceedings in this Court seeking a charging order for costs it claimed were outstanding concerning the formation of this road. 2 During the course of those proceedings, the Horahora Roading Committee was formed by some of the owners of the Horahora blocks (including Ms Sade), to try and resolve the issue. An agreement was entered into with Dickson Transport for payment of the debt and the application was dismissed by consent. [16] Mr Mahanga...

5. CB v UH Ltd [2022] NZDT 150 (26 August 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...a hazard only once it was cracked due to the encroaching trees, as it had been well maintained over the years with reasonably regular painting to ensure no exposure of the substrate to UV light, which causes the deterioration that enables particle formation and consequently the risk of asbestosis to anyone who inhales. 8. Nevertheless, CB cannot recover the full replacement cost of the shed because there is an element of betterment. His original shed was built in 2002, though CB’s evide...

6. EM & TM v FW [2024] NZDT 575 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT FW The Tribunal orders: FW is to pay EM and TM the sum of $21,449.22 on or before 31 July 2024. Reasons: 1. EM and TM purchased a house from FW. The parties agreed that a large spa pool present at the property was to form part of the purchase. 2. When EM and TM moved into the house they filled the spa pool up with water and then turned on the spa in an attempt to heat the water. After around an hour the lights in the house flickered, and then the electric...

7. DI v DE & UC Ltd [2022] NZDT 105 (13 September 2022) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...is not entitled to make any legal claim under the contract. DI cannot bring a claim for refund of the deposit, therefore the claim is dismissed. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 13 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. HX v NM [2022] NZDT 206 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...was created as a result of a subdivision undertaken by HX. 2. NM purchased the newly subdivided site and engaged a construction company to build a new house. During the course of construction, HX alleges that heavy trucks caused damage in the form of cracks to the approximately 50-year old driveway. He also contends that water pipes were broken twice by NM’s contractors, leading to excessive water bills. 3. HX claims $5,612.95; being $1,550.00 for losses relating to high water bil...

9. KS v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 28 (11 January 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...of hours and his staff dried out the wet carpet. KS said he was assured the water damage would be rectified and he was phoned a few weeks later – repairs still had not been carried out and he says at that point there was further damage in the form of dents to external panels, and he noticed that the rear window rubber had been cut in order to remove the rear window. 3. The certification work was subsequently completed by H Ltd and a $250.00 discount was applied to the bill for the...

10. ZZ v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 323 (11 August 2023) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...that the concrete supplied by L Ltd is of acceptable quality. His claim is therefore dismissed and there is no need for me to address the third issue (remedy). Referee: R Merrett Date: 11 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...