Search Results

1. Mahanga v Sade - Horahora 1A1 (2017) 148 Taitokerau MB 237 (148 TTK 237) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...order for discovery of certain documents in the possession or power of Violet Sade. Ms Sade opposes any such order. The issue for determination is whether an order for discovery should be granted. Background [2] Mr Mahanga has filed substantive applications seeking: (a) An injunction preventing Tahi Estate Ltd (“Tahi”) from conducting business on the Horahora 1A1, Horahora 1A3B and the Horahora 1A4C blocks (“the Horahora blocks”); and (b) Compensation from Ms Sade and...

2. DG Ltd v ID Ltd [2020] NZDT 1441 (24 August 2020) [pdf, 215 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1441 APPLICANT DG Ltd RESPONDENT ID Ltd The Tribunal orders: DG Ltd is to pay ID Ltd $300.00 on or before 15 September 2020. Reasons 1. On or about 13 March 2020, ID Ltd had been engaged to do work by a neighbouring property owner to the property occupied by DG Ltd. On the morning before starting the work, ID...

3. 2017 NZSSAA 064 (9 November 2017) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...the age and residence requirements. However, he is married and that is a factor that can affect his entitlement. He accepts that as he is married he is only entitled to New Zealand Superannuation paid at half the married rate. [2] Part of the application process required by the Chief Executive is that applicants must submit information relating to their spouse. The Appellant submitted his application, which included a good deal of information regarding his wife. It included her n...

4. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 449 APPLICANT DB Limited RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay DB Limited the sum of $776.00 on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons 1. DB Limited (the Motel) run a motel at [town]. Under the Education and Training Act 2020, the board of a school is a body corporate and therefore the legal embodiment of the school....

5. TQ & MQ v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 460 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 460 APPLICANT TQ and MQ RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: H Ltd is to pay the sum of $19,355.88 to TQ and MQ, as trustees of the TQ Trust, by no later than 19 July 2024. Reasons: 1. On 19 December 2020, the Applicant entered into an Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate with H Ltd to buy a section at [address]. The...

6. Gorgus v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Mr SJ Fraser for plaintiff Mr S McCusker and Ms VM Rea for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 July 2022 DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] In July 2019, while Mr Gorgus was in custody, he made two requests for certain specified personal information to the Chief Executive, Department of Corrections (“Corrections”). He made a third request for information in October 2019 to a lawyer acting for Corrections. 1 [This decision...

7. Statement of Defence [docx, 37 KB]

   Guidance on using the statement of defence template About the statement of defence [bookmark: Purpose]If you have been served with a claim in the District Court, and you wish to defend this claim, you must file in the court, and serve on the plaintiff a statement of defence within the timeframe specified on the notice of proceedings. This is usually within 25 working days of being served (or 30 working days if you were served outside New Zealand). In your statement of defence you must address e...

8. LW v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 352 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 352 APPLICANT LW RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LW was introduced to law firm N Ltd by a real estate agent via email on 2 January 2024. The real estate agent wrote that LW, [a foreign national], was looking to gain some understanding around his ability to purchase property in Ne...

9. NI & SL Ltd v AI [2024] NZDT 334 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...Ltd NI and the seller signed an agreement for sale and purchase of a business for $35,000.00, and a $5000.00 deposit was paid. Then on 29 September NI notified AI that the purchase was not proceeding in reliance on the due diligence condition, and requested the refund of the deposit, which the seller refused. 2. NI claims $5000.00 for the deposit. 3. AI counter-claims $2,903.76 from NI for legal fees she says were incurred as a result of a misrepresentation and misleading and dece...

10. NN v TD [2021] NZDT 1343 (11 March 2021) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...that day, however I accept that it was within TD’s sole right to decide whether or not to sell the puppy to NN as this was one of the conditions to the contract and cancel the contract. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to Mr NN? 9. NN claimed for the return of his deposit and for the costs he incurred in visiting TD’s puppy and for securing a new puppy. Aside from the deposit of $500.00, none of the other costs or losses were evidenced. In any event as there has been no br...