Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12515 items matching your search terms

  1. KD v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 363 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 363 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. The counterclaim is struck out. Reasons 1. The Respondent, M Ltd, operated by LM, conducts a business selling both new and pre-loved bridal dresses through “popup” events. Prospective buyers register for the events booking one hour fitting appointments...

  2. DN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 145 [pdf, 185 KB]

    PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPLICANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPLICANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 145 ACR 253/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN DN Applicant AN...

  3. BM Ltd v YN [2015] NZDT 769 (23 February 2015) [pdf, 71 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 769 BETWEEN BM LIMITED APPLICANT AND YN RESPONDENT Date of Order: 23 February 2015 Referee: Referee Smallholme ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that YN is to pay BM Limited the sum of $1,727.98 with payment to be made by 5pm on Monday 16 March 2015. Reasons [1] In mid-2012 ABC Limited (“ABC”) undertook remedial building, plumbing and tiling work to the bathroom...

  4. Moore - Waitara East Section 81 B [2018] Chief Judge's MB 842 (2018 CJ 842) [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...AOTEA DISTRICT A20180006300 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Māori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Waitara East Section 81 B (Rohutu) and a decision of the Registrar to refuse applications for filing BETWEEN Kevin Moore Applicant Appearances: G Sharrock for the applicant Judgment: 30 November 2018 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC Copies to: Gerald Sharrock, Rightlaw Limited, 11 Kahui Street,...

  5. ABQ and ABR v ZYO [2013] NZDT 56 (5 June 2013) [pdf, 83 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 56 BETWEEN ABQ APPLICANT AND ABR Ltd APPLICANT’S INSURER AND ZYO Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 5 June 2013 Referee: Referee Lang ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 25 November 2012, ABQ had parked his car on the side of the road. The driver of a campervan, [registration number], revers...

  6. DC v WX [2015] NZDT 830 (9 June 2015) [pdf, 122 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 830 BETWEEN DC APPLICANT AND WX RESPONDENT Date of Order: 9 June 2015 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out and the counter claim is dismissed. Facts [1] DC and WX are neighbours. Their properties were surveyed in 2007 or 2008 when subdivided by the previous owner. In 2011, WX had his driveway tar sealed. In A...

  7. KT v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 632 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 632 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd pay KT $214.50 on or before 22 December 2023. KT is to return the lockset on receipt of the refund. Reasons 1. KT purchased a fender and lockset from D Ltd for $429.00 being parts from a [car]. KT says that the parts he purchased are not of acceptable quality. He claim...

  8. [2023] NZEmpC 77 Halse v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...resolves an application by the first plaintiff, Mr Halse, for judgment by default against the defendant, the Hamilton City Council. The application is made on the ground that the Hamilton City Council has failed to file a statement of claim. [2] For the reasons explained, Mr Halse’s application is dismissed. It could have been struck out. Mr Halse challenges a determination of the Authority [3] Mr Halse is dissatisfied with a determination of the Employment Relations...

  9. S Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 249 (11 March 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 249 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is ordered to pay S Ltd the sum of $3,682.08. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 28 March 2024. Reasons: 1) On 29 September 2022 the applicant ordered a forklift from the respondent. The forklift had to be sourced by the respondent from overseas. The...

  10. FD Ltd v FT [2021] NZDT 1577 (20 July 2021) [pdf, 216 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1577 APPLICANT FD Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT FT SECOND RESPONDENT CR Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. CR Ltd is to pay FD Ltd $30,000 on or before 5.00pm on 11 August 2021. Reasons: 1. In October 2020, CR Ltd approached FD Ltd to engage several of its music artists to perform at a Festival event in Febr...