Search Results

1. NU & IO v BM & ME [2024] NZDT 770 (25 November 2024) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

2. C Ltd v OB [2023] NZDT 83 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 83 APPLICANT C Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT OB as trustee of B Trust SECOND RESPONDENT B Ltd as trustee of B Trust The Tribunal orders: OB and B Ltd, both as trustees of B Trust, are jointly and severally liable to pay $11,270.00 to C Ltd on or before 30 March 2023. Reasons 1. C Ltd contracted to provide earth...

3. ABJ Ltd & ABK v ZYT Ltd [2012] NZDT 66 (21 August 2012) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...ABK SECOND APPLICANT AND ZYT Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 21 August 2012 Referee: Referee Haronga ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Applicants’ claim is to be dismissed. Facts [1] CB, a director of the Applicant, ABJ Ltd, was also a director of the company NV Ltd. On 24 February 2011, NV Ltd entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement for the sale of a gym busines...

4. CO v KY & Ors [2024] NZDT 807 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 134 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 807 APPLICANT CO RESPONDENT KY SECOND RESPONDENT MN THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. MN is struck off this claim. Reasons 1. CO claims she is entitled to commission on a property sale because she says she showed her clients the property before G L...

5. Slinger v Zhou [2015] NZIACDT 38 (15 April 2015) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...applicant so she and her husband (the applicants) could seek residence visas. [7.2] In July 2011, the complainants engaged Ms Zhou to assist with the immigration process by submitting an expression of interest, and intending that would progress to visa applications. The plan was to use the skilled migrant category to gain residence visas for New Zealand. 3 [7.3] During the period from 30 May 2011 until 24 January 2013, Ms Zhou was the sole licensed immigration adviser in t...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 68 KAQ v Attorney-General [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...at that point aired the dispute in public. … [15] Some of the material falling within the scope of the application relates to personal and sensitive matters, and allegations which were not tested because the claim was discontinued. While the applicant has said that they would be mindful of the fact that the claim did not result in a judgment, I consider that providing access to the documents held on the Court file may give an incomplete and potentially inaccurate picture in the c...

7. I Ltd v EX [2024] NZDT 219 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 218 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT EX The Tribunal orders: EX is to pay $943.62 to I Ltd on or before 24 April 2024. Reasons 1. EX engaged I Ltd to provide drain unblocking services at his tenanted property in early April 2023. I Ltd attended on 7 April, flushing, clearing and cutting roots in the line. EX paid the invoiced amount of...

8. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

9. BM & FM v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 735 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 735 APPLICANTS BM and FM RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent is changed from O Ltd to W Ltd. 2. W Ltd is to pay $2,506.46 to BM and FM by 31 January 2024. 3. The evidence provided by W Ltd in the document ‘Information and Submissions’ received by the [City 1] District Court on 1 December 2023 and provided to the Tribunal in the hearing of 19 Decembe

10. LCRO 149/2023 HV v BQ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 401 KB]

    ...[2024] NZLCRO 024 Ref: LCRO 149/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HV Applicant AND BQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee...