Search Results

1. LCRO 109/2023 W and F JM v EB and MK [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. This is commonly referred to as a hearing “on the papers”. [29] After undertaking a preliminary appraisal of the file, I formed the provisional view that the review could properly be conducted on the papers. The parties were given the opportunity to comment on that proposal. The applicants wished to be heard in person. The respondents were content with the matte...

2. FC v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 255 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...claim. The Tribunal has limited jurisdiction to order costs, and none of those circumstances apply. Therefore, this aspect of the claim is dismissed. Referee: J P Smith Date: 20 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. EMPC Form 4 - Statement of defence [doc, 43 KB]

   r 20(1)(a) Form 4 Under the Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / (Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch* Registry (the reference number allocated by the registry, i.e. EMPC/) …………..…………………………………... [State nature of claim] Between [full name] of [address] Plaintiff (note: if more than one plaintiff, list them separately as 2nd plaintiff, 3rd plaintiff etc)...

4. Peter and Tony Spooner Family Trust v Elle Cee Developments Ltd [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...reconsider the previous determination of the adjudicator of 31 May 2007 that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to reconsider or to review eligibility. A second issue, dependent on the answer to the first issue framed above, is whether I should, as requested by Tauranga City, refer the issue of eligibility to the High Court pursuant to s 119 of the 2006 Act. Analysis 7. The original claim was filed under the 2002 Act and found to be an eligible claim by the evaluation pa...

5. AM v JO Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 496 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...this evidence helps me to assess whether AM has proven his claim on the balance of probabilities. What was agreed about the services that were to be provided and the cost of those services? Who was the contract between? 7. A contract may be formed in writing, or orally, or may be implied by conduct. What was agreed is looked at objectively, which means by looking at what was said and done. Parties are required to adhere to the terms of their contract, unless there is a legal reas...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 65 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...ministerial portfolios, includ­ ing those of Associ ate Minister for Economic Develop ment, Associate Minister of Fi nance, Minister of Com­ merce, Minis ter of Com muni ca tions, Minis ter of Correc tions, Minister of Immi gra tion, Minis ter for Information Tech nology, Minis ter of Labour, Minis ter for State­Owned Enterprises, Minis ter of Sta tistics, and Minister of Transport. In 2009, he was made a Com pan ion of the Queen’s Service Order for services as a member of Pa...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 192 Gupta v Infosys Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2013] NZEmpC 192 WRC 35/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an order striking out amended statement of claim BETWEEN NEEL GUPTA Plaintiff AND INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (by memorandum filed on 25 September 2013 and 9 October 2013) Representation: Gregory Bennett...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 87 Riddler v Meridian Energy Ltd [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...information, communications technology equipment and services. Mr Riddler provided some of those services to Meridian as a Fujitsu employee working from Meridian’s premises in Twizel. [2] On 2 November 2020, Meridian wrote to Fujitsu requesting that it remove Mr Riddler from handling its account or any activity relating to the provision of services for it. The same day Fujitsu informed him about Meridian’s request. [3] Mr Riddler was instructed not to attend Meridian...

9. Mitchell v Corrections [2024] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Ms S Leslie for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 17 – 18 October 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 28 March 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] In late December 2019 and early January 2020, Ms Mitchell made five separate information privacy requests under the Privacy Act 19932 (‘the Act’) to the Chief Executive 1 This decision is to be cited as Mitchell v Corrections [2024] NZHRRT 13. 2 The Privacy Act 1993 was repealed and replaced by the Privacy Act 2020 on 1 December 2020...

10. IU v ND [2023] NZDT 455 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...the same document originally submitted with the claim. 4. Clause 8.3 states that if anything should happen to the horse during the lease period, the Respondent is liable for 50% of the value of the horse, 50% being $15,000.00. No valuation information was provided. The Respondent states that she was unaware of such a clause and her copy contains no such clause. 5. The Respondent was 17 years of age at the time of the contract and was asked to sign it on the spot without seeking...