Search Results

1. Stone v CAC 412 & Lim [2019] NZREADT 20 (22 May 2019) [pdf, 589 KB]

   ...disgraceful conduct is alleged under section 73 (a) the conduct in question was of the following kind: Conduct which involves a marked and serious departure from the requisite standards must be assessed as “disgraceful,” rather than some other form of misconduct which may also involve a marked and serious departure from the standards. [4] The underlying proposition which Mr. Stone puts forward is that in making what are alleged to be false complaints about him to the Real...

2. John Thom (dated 30 May 2017) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...peaceful rura~ way 'of life they had before the wind farm concept was imposed, on them. It is not acceptable, these people are all hard working members of our community, and they have been forced to fight ag'ainst something which is claimed to be a community project. Are these neighbours not part of the Blueskin Bay community? They believe they will potentially lose their unspoiled environment and have had to spend a significant amount of their own money to oppose this ap...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 10 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC [7 February 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 10 ARC 23/12 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure orders BETWEEN JOHN MATSUOKA Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 7 February 2014 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Anthony Drake and Ben Nich...

4. Tawhai - Whakatere Ki Koranui Trust and Waima North A22 (2011) 29 Taitokerau MB 212 (29 TTK 212) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...TTK 212) A20110008827 A20110008826 A20110008825 UNDER Sections 19(1)(b), 231, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakatere Ki Koranui Trust and Waima North A22 BETWEEN VELETA TAWHAI Applicant Hearing: 4 October 2011 2 November 2011 (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 2 November 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] The judgment that I now issue follows on from my earlier oral judgment...

5. 2025 NZPSPLA 017.pdf [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...6 August 2024. [14] X, Y and Z when spoken to by Police or CIPU all provided the understanding that Mr Tepa was arranging their COA’s for them and he had advised they were permitted to work without them. [15] Mr Kumar supports the Police application and notes the following in support of cancellation: [i] The nature and circumstances of the offending undermines the purpose of the Act. [ii] The offending is not a “one-off” and appears to have occurred over a...

6. Tuwhangai v Boon - Kawhia U2B [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 45 (2025 APPEAL 45) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...2025 Māori Appellate Court MB 47 accordance with conventional principles then the starting point will be that costs are appropriate; (d) if a party has acted unreasonably – for instance by pursuing a wholly unmeritorious and hopeless claim or defence – a more liberal award may well be made in the discretion of the Judge, but there is no invariable practice; (e) an award of costs at a level of 80% was warranted in the Riddiford case due to the difficult nature of the a...

7. [2022] NZACC 168 — Robinson v ACC (25 August 2022) [pdf, 341 KB]

   ...experiencing low back pain associated with the neck pain. [9] The next reference to the accident causing injury is contained in orthopaedic surgeon, Mr Kelman’s specialist medical review, from 2 June 2011 [10] What is recorded is this: Mr Robinson claims that on 13-01-1995, he was operating a bulldozer. He was clearing the number of pine trees from a ridge and pushing them down into the valley below. As he was doing so, the branch of a large pine tree became embedded in the gr...

8. Chand and Kumari v Prakash [2012] NZIACDT 85 (3 December 2012) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Adviser’s Code of Conduct (“the Code”) in relation to an agreement to provide the additional services. [2.4] Close to the time Mr Chand was required to leave New Zealand, Mr Prakash withheld Mr Chand’s passport, in order to force him to pay the fee claimed to be owing. [2.5] Mr Prakash accepted he did not comply with the Code in relation to having a written agreement, but denied withholding the passport. [2.6] The Tribunal upheld the complaint both in respect of the failure t...

9. Transcript - PC8 - Primary Sector Provisions - 8-9 November 2021 [pdf, 853 KB]

   ...plan as a whole. We want to understand the architecture of the plan and two questions flow from 20 that, and that is just to understand, and I think we’ve got it, but we need confirmation from you, either you, Ms de Latour, from witnesses, the application of the proposed new permitted and discretionary storage, but primarily discharge rules and how they relate to the existing discharge rule, the operative rule, and the plan if only – if effluent discharge from a storage facilit...

10. Oslo speech for IUCNAEL Colloquium June 2016 [pdf, 290 KB]

    ...submission, and appeals can subsequently be made to the Environment Court by people dissatisfied with a council’s decisions on their submissions. This element of the Court’s jurisdiction is unusual in the world, in environmental regulation. Applications for consent [13] Councils also have a role in receiving applications for resource consents and making decisions on those applications, sometimes by administrative function without inviting comment from other parties, and someti...