Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12924 items matching your search terms

  1. Williamson v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 18 (8 May 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...funds only for the purpose for which they were given, and did not deal with them as client funds in accordance with the Code. [4] Ms Tangilanu was also dishonest and misleading. She dishonestly told Mr Williamson (Mr Hakaumotu’s representative) an application had been lodged, and that a fee of $750 had been paid to Immigration New Zealand. In fact, she knew no such fee had been paid, as no application was lodged. She made the dishonest representation with the intention of misappropri...

  2. Chand v Devi [2016] NZIACDT 4 (14 January 2016) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...that reflects the range of penalties. In Hakaoro v R [2014] NZCA 310 the Court of Appeal dealt with an appeal against a sentence of one year and eight months imprisonment on charges under the Act. Mr Hakaoro’s appeal was unsuccessful, as was his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. 1 [12] Section 63 of the Act accordingly signals the gravity of a licensed immigration adviser allowing a person who cannot lawfully deliver professional services to do just that. The ke...

  3. BB & AB v CC LCRO 134/2012 (26 August 2015) [pdf, 47 KB]

    LCRO 134/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the[City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN BB AND AB Applicants AND CC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms BB has applied for a review of the [City] Standards Committee [X’s] decision to take no...

  4. [2023] NZEnvC 272 Barnhill Corporate Trustee Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...remaining PDP provisions.3 Following a further process for checking on minor errors and omissions, the court approved a set of final provisions for inclusion in the PDP in its final decision issued on 12 May 2023.4 [5] This decision determines an application for costs by QLDC against the Anderson Lloyd parties.5 QLDC’s application for costs [6] The application, made on 28 April 2023, is for an award of $29,000.00 comprising: (a) $21,500.00 for expert witness and legal cost...

  5. ENVC Matiatia transcript 20141006 [pdf, 5.4 MB]

    ...Algies Bay or Snells, and there were other locations, and at one stage the Akoranga location I think was identified, so there was like a future urban zone equivalent, but they got dropped. And I might say, Sir, in Northland, having just done an application up there, Sir, for the Opua Marina Extension, there’s a plan change recently approved by the Minister that recognises the provision for marinas in mooring management zones. So here we have that problem, and it’s been around...

  6. Marshall - Otukou Papakāinga Trust (2021) 437 Aotea MB 116 (437 AOT 116) [pdf, 246 KB]

    ...Zealand Aotea District A20200001789 WĀHANGA Under Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Otūkou Papakāinga Trust I WAENGA I A Between COURTNEY MARSHALL Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 21 July 2020, 418 Aotea MB 150 (Heard at Whanganui) Kanohi kitea: Appearances C Marshall and Te N Wanikau, via teleconference Whakataunga: Judgment 31 August 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA...

  7. CAC20002 v Gollins [2015] NZREADT 2 [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...consider either partial or full repayment prior to the date of confirmation. Perhaps it would be best if you spoke with him direct in this regard.” [6] There is no dispute that an agency fee of 2.5% was agreed. [7] Mr Gollins did not make a claim for the commission in 2010 but continued to assist Foodstuffs throughout the next two years to shepherd the development through resource consent with the Porirua City Council. He appears to have been very successful at this. By Septemb...

  8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 44A/07 Tones v 3D1 Ltd [pdf, 52 KB]

    ...19 September 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW [1] In May 2006 Matthew Tones entered into an agreement for supply and resale of software with 3D1 Limited (3D1). In September 2006 3D1 terminated the agreement. [2] Mr Tones brought a claim to the Employment Relations Authority alleging that he had been unjustifiably constructively dismissed. The Authority investigated the preliminary question of whether Mr Tones was engaged under a contract for services or as an employee...

  9. [2017] NZEmpC 35 Ahuja and Others v Labour Inspector [pdf, 336 KB]

    ...and defended by the original parties in the Authority, albeit now in different roles of plaintiff or defendant. The difference in this case is that, after concluding its inter partes investigation and determination of the Labour Inspector’s claims, the Authority then set out to itself conduct an investigation into a new, albeit associated, issue. This had significant ramifications for the respondents to that new investigation, now the first plaintiffs. They have been penalised...