Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 30 – Estate of Su v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...a clinic appointment booked for the 28/03/19 to discuss the finding/diagnosis – he and his family were unaware of the diagnosis at the time of admission. Mr Su rapidly deteriorated during the night after his admission. His family were informed of the cancer diagnosis during the night and told he was dying. A family meeting was held on the morning of 28/03/19 with the respiratory consultant Dr Andy Davies, palliative care specialist nurse, the family and a Cantonese interpret...

2. Proactive-release-new-Whanganui-Courthouse-Cabinet-Paper_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.3 MB]

   ...Courthouse Implementation Business Case Date of issue: 04 April 2025 The following documents have] been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circu lar CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be re leased . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it....

3. [2024] NZREADT 34 – MY v CAC 2301 & MA (19 September 2024) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...is from this decision that the owner appeals. BACKGROUND [3] The complaint concerns a residential property in Auckland. The sole legal owner registered on the certificate of title was MY. Her ex-husband was DD. He had registered a notice of claim of interest (a caveat) pursuant to the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. [4] On 3 March 2021, the solicitor for the ex-husband (the solicitor) contacted the licensee and set up a WeChat text group comprising the solicitor, the license...

4. Wellington Standards Committee v Sawyer [2013] NZLCDT 47 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...clients’ position. Knowing that the clients were personal friends of Mr Sawyer’s, Mr Radich proceeded with some caution and did not suggest, at that stage, that they may have any remedies against Mr Sawyer’s firm. [22] On receiving the request for the file Mr Sawyer who was on leave, went into the practice one evening to tidy the file in order that it could be sent to Mr Radich. Mr Sawyer acknowledged that file management had never been his strong point and when he looked...

5. Decision-of-Coroner-B-Windley-as-to-Scope-of-Issues-for-Inquiry-28-4-22-signed.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...responsibility for the Inquiry.............................................................. 11 Receipt of further submissions .......................................................................................... 11 Legal framework and principles applicable to determining scope ........................................ 12 Statutory framework .......................................................................................................... 13 Discretion to determine scope of...

6. 2020 NZPSPLA 007 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...person or legal representative present. This includes both the people who have made the complaint and the people against whom complaints have been made. b) The company may also provide the investigator with relevant evidence and the investigator can request additional information from the employer. c) The respondent and the complainant are provided with the opportunity to review and comment on all the evidence collected by the investigator. d) Both the complainant and respondent a...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 6 Cornish Trucks and Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [pdf, 279 KB]

   CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED v BURGERT GILDENHUYS [2019] NZEmpC 6 [4 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 6 EMPC 127/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND BURGERT GILDENHUYS Defendant Hearing: 4 and 5 October 2018 (H

8. Willson v CAC301 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 90 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...funeral and the fully initialled agreement was received from Mr Bridge and dated that day. [17] On 5 November 2012 the agreement became unconditional. A LIM report had been obtained but did not disclose the proposed mine because resource consent application had not yet been made. [18] On 12 November 2012, a resource application was lodged with the relevant Councils. [19] On 16 November 2012 settlement took place. [20] The licensee states he first became aware of the mine proposa...

9. Māori Land Court - Rule 5.11 Schedule - May 2017 [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 May 2017 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 May 2017, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori Appell...

10. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Zhang [2018] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...for the property. Later that afternoon Mr Drever told him he could “live with” $590,000 for the section. Mr Zhang knew of a possible interested purchaser, Mr Yan (an “existing client”) and contacted him. Mr Zhang provided Mr Yan with information given to him by Mr Drever (including a printed copy of a resource consent, and draft plans for building consent) and suggested Mr Yan should view the property and undertake some due diligence. [7] Mr Zhang met Mr Yan later...