Search Results

1. Kavyu-Munalula v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 67 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

2. Johnson v Stone - Estate of Tamati Johnson (2011) 13 Tairawhiti 251 (13 TRW 251) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 13 Tairawhiti MB 251 (13 TRW 251) A20080001109 UNDER Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Estate of Tamati (Poppy) Johnson BETWEEN THOMAS JEREMIAH TE WHAIORA JOHNSON Applicant AND MATILDA STONE Respondent Hearing: 14 December 2009 13 July 2009 (Evidence filed at Tairawhiti) 9 June 2008 (Evidence heard at Tairawhiti) Appearances: M Tarsau, counsel for the applicant J D Rangitauira, c...

3. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 123 [pdf, 226 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 123 ACR 246/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN SANDRA SMITH Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: P Schmidt for the Appellant I Hunt for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 26 July 2023...

4. M v New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...He was approved to practise as an employed barrister on 10 January 2017. [6] The appellant applied in February 2016 for a practising certificate permitting him to practise as barrister and solicitor on his own account with a trust account. That application was declined on 8 September 2016 notified to him by letter of that date. The reasons for declining the application were set out in detail as follows: “(a) Your bankruptcy was as a result of failing to meet tax obligations at a...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 157 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packing Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...Ms J McLean of the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union. [15] On 30 July 2012, Mr Howard was advised by phone that an investigation meeting would be held on 1 August 2012. This was confirmed by a letter dated 31 July 2012. He was informed of his right to bring a representative to the meeting. [16] The meeting was convened by Mr M Guy, then General Manager of the CHH Paper Bag Division, because the Human Resources Manager was unavailable. Mr Burgess also attended for th...

6. Vikashwarjeet and Devi v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 82 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...told Ms Devi of a potential issue, one of the parents had previously had a visa revoked due to what Immigration New Zealand regarded as a “character issue”. [3] Ms Devi indicated this was not of great moment, and did not include details on the application lodged with Immigration New Zealand. Immigration New Zealand declined the application on character grounds and considered the application was potentially improper due to non- disclosure. [4] An unlicensed person carried out some of...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 113 Waitoa v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...of her dismissal, was a Residential Night Attendant. [2] Mrs Waitoa was dismissed after she refused to leave the Residence Manager’s office, ultimately being arrested and escorted from the building by the New Zealand Police. Mrs Waitoa claims her dismissal was unjustifiable, including that the reaction to her behaviour by Mr Kuiti, the Residence Manager, constituted an unjustifiable action by MSD. [3] Mrs Waitoa’s claim comes to the Court as a challenge to a dete...

8. BORA Parihaka Reconciliation Bill [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...prohibited grounds of discrimination between those in comparable circumstances. In the context of the Deed, which aclmowledges the devastating historical experiences of the people of Parihaka, no other persons or groups who are not party to those claims are in comparable circumstances to the recipients of the entitlements under the Deed. No differential treatment for the purposes of s 19 therefore at1ses by excluding others from the entitlements conferred under the Deed. 7. This advice...

9. 2021-03-23 Transcript up to end of day 9 [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Commissioner Bunting Commissioner Edmonds Appearances: P Maw and M Mehlhopt for Otago Regional Council D van Mier...

10. Muaupoko-O2NL-CIA-final-v2.pdf [pdf, 14 MB]

    ...CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT MUAŪPOKO TRIBAL AUTHORITY LAKE HOROWHENUA TRUST 8 for Treaty of Waitangi settlement negotiations and under the Māori Fisheries Act 2004. It is also an Iwi Aquaculture Organisation under the Māori Commercial Aquaculture Claims Settlement Act 2004. The Muaūpoko statutory area, for the purposes of Treaty settlement processes for the Manawatū ki Porirua District Enquiry, shows the area from the main stem of the Manawatū River down to Porirua Harbour. H...