Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 215 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd interlocutory [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...1 Rimmer v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [2014] NZERA Christchurch 185. The Authority held that Mr Rimmer was not unjustifiably dismissed so that his personal grievance was unsuccessful. [4] In Mr Rimmer’s statement of claim, the facts which are relevant for the present application are summarised in this way: Isolation Breach Incident 9. On Thursday 30 January 2014 the plaintiff worked his usual 10-hour shift at the grading station. 10. At one point d...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 204 City Rail Link Limited Successor to Auckland Transport v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...seeking to have it confirm those requirements at first instance in the place of Auckland Council. [2] The requisite procedural steps under ss 198B, 198C, and 1980 RMA had been taken on various dates in March and May in 2017. [3] Under s198E the Applicants expressed their desire that the proceedings continue before the Environment Court instead of the Council. [4] The Application was supported by an affidavit of GE Edmonds and accompanied by a list of names and addresses of persons...

3. [2020] NZEnvC 189 Weston Lea Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...2020 Weston Lea & Ors v Hamilton City Council 20200831 (Interim Decision) 2 INTERIM DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The Consent is to be granted subject to conditions to be amended as set out in this Decision. B: We instruct the Applicant to prepare a draft set of conditions to follow the terms of this Decision. We understand that such work is already well advanced and direct that it be circulated to the other parties in 20 days for comment. The parties need to focus...

4. Murray - Parengarenga B3 (2016) 128 Taitokerau MB 54 (128 TTK 54) [pdf, 333 KB]

   128 Taitokerau MB 54 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU A20020005369 UNDER Section 251 and 306,Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parengarenga B3 Residue BETWEEN BARRY MURRAY Applicant A20030003449 UNDER Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF PAKOHU 2B2AJ Block AND BETWEEN PAUL ROBSON NORMAN Applicant and others – see over Hearing: 13 May 2013...

5. [2022] NZACC 158 – Sua v ACC (16 August 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...was excised and drained and has been treated with recurring visits to theatre for debridement and VAC dressings. He was brought forward again today for further debridement as the wound was quite mucky at the last wash out. [13] An ACC injury claim form was completed on 29 January 2020. It noted that the injury was caused as follows: Fiti was doing extra walking in new shoes which rubbed and caused abscess. [14] Following the lodging the claim for cover by the ward social worker...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 087 Okura Holdings Limited & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...their respective properties. [3] Identification of the RUB is a method contained in Table B 1.6.1 (a provision of the Regional Policy Statement component of the Unitary Plan) intended to address the regionally significant issue of urban growth and form in Auckland. Chapter G1 of the Unitary Plan (part of the District Plan component of the Unitary Plan) states that "the Rural Urban Boundary identifies land potentially suitable for urban development". At Okura the Unitary Pl...

7. Justice Matters July 2019 [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...Christchurch Regeneration Minister Megan Woods and Christchurch Mayor Lianne Dalziel also addressed the audience. All three speakers expressed their appreciation that this much-needed option was now available to those homeowners whose insurance claims remain unresolved eight or nine years after the earthquakes. The Tribunal will provide homeowners with a fair, speedy, flexible and cost-effective way to resolve their long-standing insurance claims relating to the earthquakes of 2010 an...

8. Justice Matters - issue 15 - July 2019 [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...Christchurch Regeneration Minister Megan Woods and Christchurch Mayor Lianne Dalziel also addressed the audience. All three speakers expressed their appreciation that this much-needed option was now available to those homeowners whose insurance claims remain unresolved eight or nine years after the earthquakes. The Tribunal will provide homeowners with a fair, speedy, flexible and cost-effective way to resolve their long-standing insurance claims relating to the earthquakes of 2010 an...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 129 Teddy and Friends Ltd v Page [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...which his employment ended and that he sought to negotiate a resolution of those concerns. Accordingly, he had raised a personal grievance for unjustified dismissal within the statutory timeframe.2 [5] The Authority determined that in respect of a claim of unjustified action, the issues would likely have folded into the unjustified dismissal personal grievance and, in any event, details of unjustified action had not been raised with sufficient specificity to enable the Authority to...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Choi [2021] NZLCDT 20 (2 June 2021) [pdf, 93 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 20 LCDT 002/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND JAEHO CHOI Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Ms N McMahon Prof D Scott Ms S Stuart HEARING HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF HEARING 27 May 2021 DA...