Cassidy v ACC [2013] NZACA 14 [pdf, 44 KB]
...on 90% of $50.00 per week. Compensation was paid for the 26 weeks from 2 October 1990 to 4 March 1992 only, as Mr Cassidy was unable to provide the evidence ACC asked for showing he was suffering from continuing loss of earnings. [6] A late application for review of this decision was made in 2012. On 18 October 2012, the Reviewer, J Maher quashed ACC’s decision but declined to make a decision on the substantive matter and noted in her conclusion that this did not prevent ACC from...