Search Results

1. CAC 20003 v Fourie [2014]NZREADT 71 [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...alternative, but has confirmed by 25 July 2014 memorandum that it relies only on charge 2 as set out below. [2] On 21 January 2013, the licensee was convicted of an offence of wilful damage, namely, that on 28 May 2012 he intentionally, and without claim of right, damaged 2478 Kopu Hikuai Road, intending to cause loss to Arlene and Samuel Marshall (who had purchased that property and were to take possession of it that day). Wilful damage is an offence under s.11 of the Summary of Offe...

2. Kruger v Nikora - Tuhoe -Te Uru Taumatua [2021] Māori Appellate Court MB 444 (2021 APPEAL 444) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...(2020 APPEAL 248). He mahi whakawā ma te Kooti Whenua Māori ki te TUT? Does the Māori Land Court have jurisdiction over TUT? [10] This appeal concerns s 236(1) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). It provides: 236 Application of sections 237 to 245 (1) Subject to subsection (2), sections 237 to 245 shall apply to the following trusts: (a) every trust constituted under this Part: (b) every other trust constituted in respect of any Maori land: (c...

3. 20240806-FINAL-Proactive-Release-Sentencing-Reform-Tranche-One.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...sentences were imposed for multiple offences of sexual violation. IN CONFIDENCE 18 use of cumulative and concurrent sentences is not unduly lenient or disproportionate, following the common law totality principle. 93. Under the Act, the application of this principle can mean that concurrent sentences have to be adjusted upwards to reflect the totality of offending (up to the maximum penalty for the most serious offence). This is important to note, as there is a common misconce...

4. [2008] Waikato DHB & ors v New Zealand PSA Inc AC 6/08 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...of the PSA and the Midlands DHBs in February, March and April 2006. What occurred at these meetings is the subject of dispute yet to be resolved but following them the advocate for the Midlands DHBs provided the PSA with a draft meca in the form that was subsequently signed by all parties and dated 21 April 2006. The Employment Relations Authority’s determination [10] Although these include matters of disputed fact to be determined by the trial Judge, the following are neverthe...

5. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...phoned Mrs Smith directly, identifying himself as a Barfoot & Thompson agent and mentioned that he may have an offer. Mrs Smith proceeded to tell Mr Littler how many offers had been made and approximately how much they were for. Mrs Smith also informed Mr Littler that their tenants had given notice and the vendors (Mr and Mrs Smith) wanted to sell the property before they needed to re-tenant it. Mr Littler then informed Mrs Smith that he and his wife were the prospective purchasers...

6. 2021-03-01 ORC - MOC - PC7 - mining permits - annexure E [pdf, 452 KB]

   ...Page 5 of 9 S8 Main Tail-Race Licence – Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder of the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry off from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning of the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 Septem...

7. 2021-05-12 Carrick Irrigation Exhibit Consent 2002.448-002.pdf [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...WSCA and 1969). S8 Main Tail-Race Licence – Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder of the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry off from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning of the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 Septe...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 45 - TTD v Zheng (14 October 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...agency assisted them to obtain visitor visas. [7] Mr Zheng continued to advise the complainant on the visitor visas and their proposed student visas. She and her husband signed a client agreement with Mr Zheng on 30 September 2018 concerning applications for student visas for them both. [8] The complainant resigned from her position at the employer as from 2 November 2018. 1 TTD v Zheng [2020] NZIACDT 37. 3 [9] Immigration New...

9. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong [2015] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 48 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 025/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER Applicant AND BOON GUNN HONG Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Fitzgerald Mr K Raureti Ms C Rowe Mr I Williams HEARING 14 October 2015 HELD AT Auckland District Court DATE OF DECISION 12 November 2015...

10. 2021-03-01 ORC - MOC - PC7 - mining permits - annexure D [pdf, 23 MB]

    ...by WSCA and 1969). S8 Main Tail−Race Licence — Every current mining privilege that is a main tail race licence shall during its currency entitle the holder o f the privilege to cut, construct, and maintain a race in order to carry of f from such claims or tail races as are specified in the licence any water, tailings, sludge, and other refuse or waste from mining operations within the meaning o f the Mining Act 1971: provided that where any such licence was granted before 10 September 196...