12515 items matching your search terms
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZLCDT 35 LCDT 019/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO. 3 Applicant AND BRUCE NELSON DAVIDSON of Auckland, Lawyer CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Ms S Hughes QC Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith HEARING at Auckland on 15 November 2012 APPEARANCES Mr P Davey and Mr M Treleave...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZLCDT 12 LCDT 014/18 IN THE MATTER OF The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO. 2 Applicant AND TIMOTHY JOHN BURCHER Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS Mr S Hunter Ms C Rowe Mr P Shaw Mr I Williams DATE OF HEARING 28 and 29 March 2019 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZLCDT 18 LCDT 019/22, 020/22 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND ALWYN O’CONNOR Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms J Gray Ms M Scholtens KC Prof D Scott Dr D Tulloch HEARING 1-3 May 2023 HELD AT Tribunals Unit, Wellington DATE OF DECISION 8 May 2...
...they vacated the property). The Agency paid them $550 as “relocation expenses”.2 [14] Mr Mosley applied to the Tenancy Tribunal for an order that the tenants pay arrears of rent. The tenants cross-applied for compensation. Mr Mosley’s application was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay the tenants $2,495.44, being 50 percent of the rent they paid during the nine weeks they occupied the property plus reimbursement of the filing fee. Mr Mosley also applied for orders again...
...13 December 2011 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C INGLIS [1] The plaintiff has brought a de novo challenge against a determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). The challenge involves a dispute as to the interpretation, application, and operation of terms in the collective employment agreement relating to on-call postal delivery employees (on-call employees). The dispute essentially relates to the obligations owed by the defendant to on-call employees called...
...NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20170001399 A20170001667 UNDER Section 67, 269(4) Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The Proprietors of Mangaroa & Other Blocks Incorporated BETWEEN TUIHANA POOK First Applicant AND VENA MURIWAI APPLETON Second Applicant AND LEO GAGE Respondent Hearing: 2 May 2017, 163 Waiariki MB 19-21 8 May 2017, 162 Waiariki MB 158-165 (Teleconference) Judgment: 28 August 2017 P...
...occupation free of rental. [12] However, prior to settlement, issues arose between the parties. The Harlows alleged misrepresentation and the imposition of restrictive covenants without their consent. Rather than settle the purchase of the land and claim damages (if available), they sought to renegotiate the purchase price. The vendor (Sherman Ltd) declined such overtures, issued a settlement notice and, ultimately, cancelled the agreement and issued proceedings in the High Court...
...intolerance, prejudice, and hatred. 3. The incitement provisions refer to those particular grounds because they were primarily enacted to fulfil New Zealand’s international obligations under the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). 4. Section 61 makes it unlawful to publish or distribute threatening, abusive, or insulting words likely to ‘excite hostility against’ or ‘bring into contempt’ any group on the grounds...
...non-destructive. [7] Mr and Mrs Wouldes also received a pre-contract disclosure form from the Body Corporate for the complex which stated (as relevant): 10. The unit or the common property is not currently and has never been the subject of a claim under the Weathertightness Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 or any other civil proceedings relating to water penetration of buildings in the unit title development. The Body Corporate has identified a problem with roof deflection and...
...reason. 12. All interested buyers then had the opportunity to investigate the building issue at 53 Forrester Drive further, or to ask me to investigate it further if it concerned them. None of the potential buyers, including Mr and Mrs Ogilvy, requested a copy of the Keates’ plans. If any buyers had requested the plans, I would have promptly collected them from Mr Keate’s office for them. 13. While marketing the property, I attended regular L J Hooker sales meetings with other...