Tapiki and Eru v New Zealand Parole Board [2019] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 403 KB]
...effect, that neither IPP 5 nor IPP 11 derogate from the obligation under the Parole Act to notify a victim of any release conditions applying to an offender. [4] The outcome of this case turns on the interpretation of s 50 of the Parole Act and on the application of that provision to the facts as found. We do not in this decision address IPP 5. THE FACTS [5] The central facts are not in dispute. The Parole Board did not challenge the evidence given by Ms Tapiki and Ms Eru and chose...