12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 460 APPLICANT TQ and MQ RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: H Ltd is to pay the sum of $19,355.88 to TQ and MQ, as trustees of the TQ Trust, by no later than 19 July 2024. Reasons: 1. On 19 December 2020, the Applicant entered into an Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate with H Ltd to buy a section at [address]. The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 352 APPLICANT LW RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LW was introduced to law firm N Ltd by a real estate agent via email on 2 January 2024. The real estate agent wrote that LW, [a foreign national], was looking to gain some understanding around his ability to purchase property in Ne...
...REPRESENTATION: Mr SJ Fraser for plaintiff Mr S McCusker and Ms VM Rea for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 July 2022 DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] In July 2019, while Mr Gorgus was in custody, he made two requests for certain specified personal information to the Chief Executive, Department of Corrections (“Corrections”). He made a third request for information in October 2019 to a lawyer acting for Corrections. 1 [This decision...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 337 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: NU is to return the [car] to BG on or before Monday 31 July 2023; and The vehicle is to be returned c/- [address] at a time to be mutually agreed with BG via text or messenger; and NU is to pay $120.00 to BG for a fine incurred by him in February 2023 (and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1496 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT LD The Tribunal hereby orders: LD is to pay the sum of $500.00 to KH on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. Reasons: 1. In June 2018, KH contacted LD, who had advertised on Facebook as a dog breeder. LD said that there would be a litter of [breed] puppies available in July 2018 for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 177 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. N Ltd is to pay to Q Ltd the sum of $95.00 on or before 2 May 2024. 2. N Ltd is not liable to pay any further amount to Q Ltd, or any debt collection companies engaged by Q Ltd in relation to parking breach number [redacted] dated 15 April 2023 which is the subject of...
...that day, however I accept that it was within TD’s sole right to decide whether or not to sell the puppy to NN as this was one of the conditions to the contract and cancel the contract. What sums, if any, are payable by TD to Mr NN? 9. NN claimed for the return of his deposit and for the costs he incurred in visiting TD’s puppy and for securing a new puppy. Aside from the deposit of $500.00, none of the other costs or losses were evidenced. In any event as there has been no br...
...Ltd NI and the seller signed an agreement for sale and purchase of a business for $35,000.00, and a $5000.00 deposit was paid. Then on 29 September NI notified AI that the purchase was not proceeding in reliance on the due diligence condition, and requested the refund of the deposit, which the seller refused. 2. NI claims $5000.00 for the deposit. 3. AI counter-claims $2,903.76 from NI for legal fees she says were incurred as a result of a misrepresentation and misleading and dece...
Guidance on using the statement of defence template About the statement of defence [bookmark: Purpose]If you have been served with a claim in the District Court, and you wish to defend this claim, you must file in the court, and serve on the plaintiff a statement of defence within the timeframe specified on the notice of proceedings. This is usually within 25 working days of being served (or 30 working days if you were served outside New Zealand). In your statement of defence you must address e...
...The complainant says: [2.1] She and her family had to apply for a work visa, and related visas. They had been in New Zealand for a period and their visas would expire in the relatively near future. [2.2] Mr Ahuja accepted instructions to lodge the application for the family. [2.3] He prepared the application, and it was defective. Either Mr Ahuja or someone in his practice filed the defective application. [2.4] Immigration New Zealand returned the application and identified what was r...