13109 items matching your search terms
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 29 April 2024 Our ref: OIA 111025 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Health, Safety and Wellbeing documents Thank you for your email of 30 March 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministry of Justice’s (the Ministry) health, safety and wellbeing st...
...2012, though the professional offending was largely complete at that point. Mr Letalu has not given any explanation that significantly ameliorates what was a sustained and delinquent failure to meet his professional obligations. [8] Mr Letalu did claim he agreed with the complainant to make a section 61 application rather than lodge an appeal. However, that is not consistent with the findings made, and he has not produced records to support that claim. It would have been an important iss...
...they had any objection to his showing the property to his wife, to which the Whittys agreed. On 5 August Mr Reed sent the Whittys, by email, an offer to purchase the property himself, for $1.1 million. The offer was on an Agency sale agreement form. Mr Reed had drawn a line through the box at the bottom of the form which stated that the sale was made by the Agency, and had written “PRIVATE SALE” under the box. The Whittys signed the agreement and returned it to Mr Reed on 6...
...Andrew Rewi, Principal Analyst, Whānau Wellbeing, Policy Puni, Te Puni Kōkiri These notes provide a broad overview of the key points raised by participants and are not minutes of the hui. The headings used in this note correlate with the information contained in the pamphlet Te Ara Whakamua ā tātou – Crown/Māori relations (which can be found at https://www.justice.govt.nz/maori-land-treaty/crown-maori-relations/initial-proposals-from- government/). Main issues and oppo...
...of, effectively, 1/365 th of the pilots’ annual salary in identifying the value of the relevant daily pay. Before the Authority the first plaintiff contended that the correct divisor was 206 or, in the alternative, 235, representing what it claimed was the number of days the pilots were actually required to work in order to earn their salary. In its determination the Authority concluded that the approach taken by Mount Cook in calculating the relevant daily pay, by looking at...
...taking into account his 18 years’ experience with the company, it found that the dismissal was justified. [3] Mr Tamarua has challenged that decision as well as the award of $1,500 costs made against him by the Authority. He abandoned his claim for reinstatement during the Authority investigation. In his statement of claim he now seeks only lost wages but made no formal request for compensation. The facts [4] Mr Tamarua was employed first by New Zealand Rail and then Toll NZ...
...first related to the issue of legal representation and whether counsel for the parties may be prevented from continuing to act in the light of the Supreme Court decision in, Vector Gas Ltd v Bay of Plenty Energy Ltd. 1 The second related to an application by the plaintiff to call evidence at the hearing from a Mr Keith Handlee who, at one stage, had acted as a mediator in relation to the dispute. At the hearing, I gave an oral decision on both matters and I now proceed to outline...
...Mr Anand’s well-being and a desire to find out when he would be returning to work. [10] It is common ground that Mr Gounder telephoned Mr Anand again later that day, at 3.20 pm. Mr Gounder says that the purpose of this call was to reiterate a request that Mr Anand bring a medical certificate in to work when he returned. Mr Anand says that Mr Gounder repeated his earlier comments that he must return to work immediately and if he did not he need not bother coming back again. Mr A...
...customer on his way into work and he told Mr Taafuli to use the wages he had been given the previous evening to pay the client for the vehicle. 8 [8] Mr Taafuli went to the Kelburn address and negotiated a price of $300 for the vehicle. Mr Taafuli claimed that he gave the customer $300 cash. A receipt for $300 was signed by the customer. Later that same day, however, the customer contacted Mega Wreckers and stated that she had received only $200, not $300. 9 Mr Hossaini ques...
...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZLCDT 21 LCDT 009/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 Applicant AND OLINDA WOODROFFE Practitioner DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr S Hunter KC Ms M Noble Prof D Scott Ms R Va’ai (by VMR) DATE OF HEARING 3 April 2025 HELD AT Specialist Courts and...