Search Results

1. Forrest v Chief Executive Department of Corrections (Referral back to HRC) [2014] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr BDN Forrest in person Ms D Harris for defendant DATE OF DECISION: 5 September 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL REFERRING COMPLAINT BACK TO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Introduction [1] By application dated 2 September 2014 the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections (Corrections) applies to have this matter referred back to the Human Rights Commission under s 92D of the Human Rights Act 1993 for mediation. During a telec...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 42 Chen v WNY Group Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 42 EMPC 319/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN RAN CHEN Plaintiff AND WNY GROUP LIMITED First Defendant AND LI WU Second Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person J Wickes, counse...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 157 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 157 EMPC 139/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN GEORGE COWAN Plaintiff AND CHARLES KIDD IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GEOFFREY KIDD, TRADING AS KIDD PARTNERSHIP Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J R Copeland...

4. Auckland Standards Committee v Tier [2013] NZLCDT 11 [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...matter. [9] The order is therefore entirely necessary. The penalty orders sought by the Standards Committee are straightforward, they are the order under s 242(h)(ii). Further orders are also sought in relation to costs and this morning an oral application has been made seeking compensation for the complainant pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act which provides a sum of up to $25,000.00 can be awarded where any act or omission of a practitioner or former practitioner or employee or...

5. Deputy Registrar - Kapowai A1A, A1B, A2A, A2B1, A2B2, A3, C1 and C2 Blocks (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 125 (7 TTK 125) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 7 TAITOKERAU MB 125 (7 TTK 125) A20100008406 IN THE MATTER OF Kapowai A1A, A1B, A2A, A2B1, A2B2, A3, C1 and C2 Blocks ML 12835 ML 12839 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant (Heard at Whangarei) Judgment: 30 June 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] A survey requisition has been issued under s 332 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 (“1993 Act”) in relation...

6. Government-response-to-the-Law-Commissions-report-Class-Actions-and-Litigation-Funding.pdf [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...litigation funders operating without clear guidance. 10 A class action is a civil legal action brought by an individual on behalf of a group or class of people with similar legal interests. Financial barriers exist due to both the costs of bringing a claim to court, as well as the risk of an order for adverse costs which would require the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s costs. Combining many ak1uc0av4w 2022-12-12 17:04:45 I N C O N F I D E N C E 3 I N C O N F I D E N C E...

7. Pomare v Pomare - Utakura No 8 (2016) 140 Taitokerau MB 39 (140 TTK 39) [pdf, 230 KB]

   140 Taitokerau MB 39 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20150004107 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Utakura No. 8 BETWEEN FRED POMARE Applicant A20150001238 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Utakura No. 8 AND BETWEEN WIREMU POMARE Applicant Hearing: 24 September 2015 27 January 2016 (Heard at...

8. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavit on behalf of Trustees Exhibits A to H [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ' A " Ngati Pahauwera CMT/PCR Application Area rairoa Raupunga W aihua Mohaka This map is current as at 9/11/2012 CO Mapptng by G eo s pa Ba I Solutions Ltd. O ctober 2012 M O J 2012-053 DUPLICATE C W ^ l l O R a n g a h a u a W h a n u i D i s t r i c t i r e WAIROA JOY HIPPOLITE N o v e m b e r 1996 W o r k i n g P a p e r : F i r s t R e l e a s e W A IT A N G I T R I B U N A L R A N G A H A U A W H A N U I SERIES This is the exhibit marked “ C�...

9. Young people & infringement fines: a qualitative study [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...viewed by those people who are “experts” in accumulating them. Each year, New Zealanders receive about 2.7 million infringement offence notices. The majority of people pay the relevant fee to the prosecuting authority within the time allowed. A few request a court hearing to contest the notice or seek a reduction in penalty. A somewhat larger number however, just do not pay. About 37% of infringements by volume, or 54% by value, are then passed to the courts for enforcement action. 41%...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 019 Willowridge Developments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 10 MB]

    ...than 3 m in all areas. The appellant opposes the Council's arnendments to the conditions as an increase from 70% to 85% is not necessary, and it is impractical to expect 85% of the plants to survive and be in a healthy condition. It is also claiming that it is not appropriate to require plants to grow to 3 m in all areas as many of the plants identified do not grow to that height. [18] The Council considers that the condition should be retained as6 : 5 6 (a) the appellant...