12515 items matching your search terms
...to the plaintiff, John Matsuoka, an order was made that any costs incurred by PSG or Zambion in complying with the orders both as to retrieval and storage are to be met by Mr Matsuoka. A dispute has now arisen as to the quantum of the charges claimed by PSG and Zambion in extracting the information from computer records and transferring the information to a memory 1 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 174....
...accordance with immigration legislation including the Immigration Act 2009. [1.2] He failed to do so in that: [1.2.1] He allowed an unlicensed person to provide immigration advice in the course of engaging the complainant, and to assist with his application for a visitor visa. [1.2.2] With Mr Li’s knowledge, the unlicensed person performed actions that breached section 6 of the Act. [1.3] The Code of Conduct (clause 3) required that Mr Li maintain professional business practices...
...Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: Plaintiff, in person H Kynaston, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 14 November 2019 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] Ms Packwood’s claim against ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd (ANZ) was struck out in my judgment of 23 September 2019.1 [2] I reserved costs, provisionally indicating that these should be assessed on a Category 2, Band B basis, under the Court’s Guideline Scal...
...in the proceedings that is greater than the general public: (a) CNI is responsible for the day to day management of over 170,000 hectares of land that was returned to CNI Iwi Holdings Trust pursuant to the Central North Island Iwi Collective Claims Settlement Act 2008. (b) In this capacity, CNI is landowner of 34,000 hectares of the land in the Waikato River Catchment (the CNI Catchment Land). 1 ENV-2020-AKL-98. TTH-1020...
...in the proceedings that is greater than the general public: (a) CNI is responsible for the day to day management of over 170,000 hectares of land that was returned to CNI Iwi Holdings Trust pursuant to the Central North Island Iwi Collective Claims Settlement Act 2008. (b) In this capacity, CNI is landowner of 34,000 hectares of the land in the Waikato River Catchment (the CNI Catchment Land). (c) The Appeal directly relates to the CNI Catchment Land. 1 ENV-2020-AKL-88....
...in the proceedings that is greater than the general public: (a) CNI is responsible for the day to day management of over 170,000 hectares of land that was returned to CNI Iwi Holdings Trust pursuant to the Central North Island Iwi Collective Claims Settlement Act 2008. (b) In this capacity, CNI is landowner of approximately 34,000 hectares of the land in the Waikato River Catchment (the CNI Catchment Land). 1 ENV-2020-AKL-102....
...in the proceedings that is greater than the general public: (a) CNI is responsible for the day to day management of over 170,000 hectares of land that was returned to CNI Iwi Holdings Trust pursuant to the Central North Island Iwi Collective Claims Settlement Act 2008. (b) In this capacity, CNI is landowner of 34,000 hectares of the land in the Waikato River Catchment (the CNI Catchment Land). (c) The Appeal directly relates to the CNI Catchment Land
...the adviser: [2.1] Was incapable; and [2.2] Engaged in dishonest or misleading behaviour. [3] The Registrar provided an outline of the events leading to these allegations. They involved an unsatisfactory interaction relating to an immigration application. [4] However, the facts presented in support of the complaint did not involve the adviser meeting the complainant. Indeed the Registrar, who lodged the Statement of Complaint with the Tribunal, did not provide any facts that involved...
...Gu-Chang published a website article which was unprofessional and disclosed confidential information. It concerned a client’s detention at a police station and likely deportation. [2.2] In addition Ms Gu-Chang charged a fee of $12,800 to prepare an application to Immigration New Zealand for a visa under the discretionary provisions in the Act, which was alleged not to be a fair and reasonable fee. [3] The Tribunal upheld both aspects of the complaint, finding the publication was unpr...
...Howell who is an experienced advocate. In the e-mail he took issue with the Benefits Review Committee which had upheld the Ministry’s 2 decision of 23 January in a decision issued on 14 March 2014 contending that a proper assessment of the application had not been made. He was also critical of the scope and nature of the information the Benefits Review Committee relied on and said that a determination about the “process of natural justice” was required because the perso...