12924 items matching your search terms
...NZEmpC 153 EMPC 377/2015 EMPC 277/2016 EMPC 215/2017 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed AND IN THE MATTER of interlocutory applications BETWEEN PETER D'ARCY LORIGAN Plaintiff AND INFINITY AUTOMOTIVE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 October 2017, and on documents filed on 2, 8, 10, 13, 20, 23 24 November, and 4, 5 December 2017 (...
...reporting to client. - hearing time * $48 per half hour For: • attending Interlocutory Hearing(s) • any agent fees. GRANTING NOTES – SCHEDULE A, B & C Legend * Repeatables - this is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence of this activity. This includes for all hearings/appearances that are stood down or adjourned, or which need to be rescheduled because the client fails to appear. The fee that can be claimed relates to the hearing ti...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 330 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT X Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In April 2012, X Limited manufactured a set of double-glazed cedar french doors for DT. The doors were installed in her house to replace some existing doors. In May 2023, moisture appeared in the double-glazed pa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 14 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT WN Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LB The Tribunal orders: LB is to pay directly to BT the sum of $47.72 on or before 27 July 2022. This order determines both the claim and counterclaim. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at...
...settlement date was 28 January 2022, which was bought forward to 27 January 2022 by agreement. 2. On 15 December 2021 the property was flooded, and an insurance claim was made to cover damage to the gib and other repairs. 3. On 21 December 2021 TT requested for the contract to be cancelled and offered for HN and SN keep the deposit. HN and SN did not agree that TT could cancel and reaffirmed that the insurer was arranging for the repairs to be carried out urgently and that it woul...
...The Tribunal orders: 1. LD is added to the claim as Second Applicant. 2. GP is removed as the Respondent and replaced by Q Ltd. 3. The claim by TD and LD against Q Ltd is dismissed. REASONS 1. In early April 2023, the Applicants, TD and LD, made a booking through [website] to stay with their family at a unit at the [the Property] (“the Property”) for one night on Saturday, 6 May 2023. The Property is managed by the Respondent, Q Ltd (“Q Ltd”), and the u...
...1894. [3] That backdrop provides the context for Mr Tucker’s claim to this Tribunal under the Privacy Act 1993. [4] Anticipating an adverse decision by the READT, on 20 September 2016 Mr Tucker emailed the Real Estate Agents Authority (REAA) requesting all information it held about him under the Privacy Act and the Official Information Act 1982. [5] On 22 September 2016 the REAA acknowledged receipt of Mr Tucker’s Privacy Act request. Mr Tucker was told that the response to t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 673 APPLICANT ZQ Limited RESPONDENT VN SECOND RESPONDENT HU THIRD RESPONDENT LG FOURTH RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: VN, HU, LG, and KN, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $2,466.75 to ZQ Limited on or before 10 September 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant ZQ Limited owns a h...
...regulations and is not seeking an order for its removal. The Tribunal has no power to order a mirror to be erected or to order the respondent to contribute towards the cost of a mirror. As the fence height is permitted by Council I cannot grant the applicants request for it to be reduced. 10. For these reasons the applicants claim must also be dismissed. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 22 April 2021 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Partie...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 219 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay $3,783.50 to T Ltd on or before 20 December 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. T Ltd is a manufacturer of condiments and sauces. S Ltd harvests and supplies dried native botanicals such as kawakawa. T Ltd had purchased product from S L...