Search Results

1. 2017 NZSSAA 064 (9 November 2017) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...the age and residence requirements. However, he is married and that is a factor that can affect his entitlement. He accepts that as he is married he is only entitled to New Zealand Superannuation paid at half the married rate. [2] Part of the application process required by the Chief Executive is that applicants must submit information relating to their spouse. The Appellant submitted his application, which included a good deal of information regarding his wife. It included her n...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 68 KAQ v Attorney-General [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...at that point aired the dispute in public. … [15] Some of the material falling within the scope of the application relates to personal and sensitive matters, and allegations which were not tested because the claim was discontinued. While the applicant has said that they would be mindful of the fact that the claim did not result in a judgment, I consider that providing access to the documents held on the Court file may give an incomplete and potentially inaccurate picture in the c...

3. DG Ltd v ID Ltd [2020] NZDT 1441 (24 August 2020) [pdf, 215 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1441 APPLICANT DG Ltd RESPONDENT ID Ltd The Tribunal orders: DG Ltd is to pay ID Ltd $300.00 on or before 15 September 2020. Reasons 1. On or about 13 March 2020, ID Ltd had been engaged to do work by a neighbouring property owner to the property occupied by DG Ltd. On the morning before starting the work, ID...

4. Mahanga v Sade - Horahora 1A1 (2017) 148 Taitokerau MB 237 (148 TTK 237) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...order for discovery of certain documents in the possession or power of Violet Sade. Ms Sade opposes any such order. The issue for determination is whether an order for discovery should be granted. Background [2] Mr Mahanga has filed substantive applications seeking: (a) An injunction preventing Tahi Estate Ltd (“Tahi”) from conducting business on the Horahora 1A1, Horahora 1A3B and the Horahora 1A4C blocks (“the Horahora blocks”); and (b) Compensation from Ms Sade and...

5. Te Wini v Askelund (Removal of Second Plaintiff) [2015] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...hearing by Mr Askelund are to be filed and served by 5pm on Friday 16 January 2015. [6.4] The proceedings are to be heard at Auckland on Wednesday 4 February 2015. The venue is Hearing Room 5, Chorus House, 41 Federal Street, Auckland. [8] At the request of Mr Te Wini the timetable was amended in that the date for him to file his written statements of evidence was changed from 9 January 2015 to 20 January 2015 and the date for Mr Askelund to file his written statements consequently cha...

6. BM & FM v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 735 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 735 APPLICANTS BM and FM RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent is changed from O Ltd to W Ltd. 2. W Ltd is to pay $2,506.46 to BM and FM by 31 January 2024. 3. The evidence provided by W Ltd in the document ‘Information and Submissions’ received by the [City 1] District Court on 1 December 2023 and provided to the Tribunal in the hearing of 19 Decembe

7. BORA Equal Pay Amendment Bill [pdf, 291 KB]

   ...of whether they view the employee’s pay equity claim as being arguable; c. s 13H requires employers, where pay equity claims have been consolidated, to provide all claimants with one another’s names and addresses (except where a claimant has requested confidentiality); d. s 13I requires employers, where pay equity claims against multiple employers have been consolidated, to provide all claimants with the name of, and name and address of representatives for, every employer party to...

8. BORA Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. c. cl 19 requires employers, where pay equity claims have been consolidated, to provide all claimants with one another’s names and addresses (except where a claimant has requested confidentiality); d. cl 22 requires parties to a pay equity claim to provide each other information that is reasonably required to support or substantiate the claim or a response to the claim; and e. cl 41 requires employers to keep...

9. DB Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 449 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 222 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 449 APPLICANT DB Limited RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay DB Limited the sum of $776.00 on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons 1. DB Limited (the Motel) run a motel at [town]. Under the Education and Training Act 2020, the board of a school is a body corporate and therefore the legal embodiment of the school....

10. LCRO 149/2023 HV v BQ (2 April 2024) [pdf, 401 KB]

    ...[2024] NZLCRO 024 Ref: LCRO 149/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN HV Applicant AND BQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee...