12730 items matching your search terms
...Sections 67, 289 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 1 Deposited Plan 696 KARANEMA BARTLETT AND PAMELA REO AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF PUKEPUKE TANGIORA Applicants Hearing: 5 July 2017 (Heard at Hastings) Appearances: K Kupa for the Trustees P Harman for H Bennett and H Baker Judgment: 24 July 2017 INTERIM JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY...
...NEW PLYMOUTH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KINGAMOTU IN THE NIA TIER OF BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 185 an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Ivfanagement Act 1991 REGINA PROPERTIES LIMITED (ENV-2021-AK.L-000146) Appellant/ Applicant NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the papers in Wellington Last case event: 23 February 2023 Date of Decision: 30 August 2023 Dat...
.../Collectables/Medals/New-Zeala Shopping 7/4/2004 12:46:27 pm [10] In order to follow the matters raised in the investigation, it was necessary to understand some technical matters about the programming of Air New Zealand’s Internet system. Mr Filkin, the application service manager for GEN-I, was called by Air New Zealand for his expertise in IT applications and on-line Internet activity. He was not working for GEN-I when the Air New Zealand Internet data was analysed but is fam...
...containing personal information of a highly sensitive and confidential nature was stolen from the second defendant at a time when the second defendant had possession of the file for the purpose of interviewing the plaintiff in connection with her ACC claim. It is said that both defendants were in breach of the Health Information Privacy Code 1994, Rule 5 which sets out obligations relating to the storage and security of health information. The Privacy Commissioner concluded there had bee...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZLCDT 32 LCDT 012/18 and 013/18 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WAIKATO BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO.1 Applicant AND JOHN CAMPION Practitioner CHAIR Judge DF Clarkson MEMBERS Mr S Grieve QC Ms N McMahon Mr P Shaw Ms S Stuart ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISION 17 October 2019 SUBMISSIONS Mr McCaughan for the Standards Com...
...the cost of the headstone; b) Bradley Kemp personally dealt with the headstone supplier and was therefore personally liable for the debt; and c) the cost of the headstone should not have come out of the funds of the Trust. [5] Mr Kemp also claims that he and those who support him mistakenly thought that Acting Chief Judge Isaac had instructed them to appeal his decision. [6] At the appeal hearing various matters were raised relating to the will of Margaret Marata Kemp, her bank...
1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 29 February 2016 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 29 February 2016, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Mā...
...expressed in it are those of the independent evaluation team and do not necessarily represent the views of the Ministry of Justice or the Government. The report is hosted on the Ministry of Justice’s World Wide Web site,(www.justice.govt.nz) for user information only. The Ministry has attempted to ensure that the report is an accurate copy of the hard copy available from the Ministry of Justice. However, no liability is accepted in respect of any person who makes any use of the information...
...was always Mr Sengupta’s intention to copy material and use it for his own business. He submitted that Mr Sengupta’s reasons for doing this were that he needed it for working from home or took the information to protect himself from a potential claim from Buy West. He submitted that Mr Sengupta’s explanation that he needed the documents in case Buy West withheld commission payments was “inconsistent and unconvincing”. Instead the Committee submitted that the overwhelming infer...
...did indeed receive some copies of the material the Licensees say they provided, and that therefore he was, or at least had the opportunity to be aware of the decision made by the body corporate in 2013 and 2014 regarding the additional car parks forming part of the common property and the basis on which they would be made available to unit owners. [12] Nonetheless, the Committee was of the view that the provision of this additional material did not exonerate the licensees. They said...