Search Results

1. 2020-10-12-Key-Issues-Report-9-October-2020-Appendices.pdf [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...the matters. APPENDIX A Page 2 of 2 In reaching my decision I considered: a) The Environmental Protection Authority recommendation that I refer the matters to the Environment Court; b) The views of the Otago Regional Council, being the applicant and the relevant local authority that would have processed and decided the matters if I had not directed that they be referred to the Environment Court for decision; and c) The capacity of the Otago Regional Council to process the...

2. Chorenova v Accident Compensation Corporation (leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 249 [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...related to the covered injury or are causally linked to the accident evident of 29/1/19”. [60] Following an MRI undertaken on 3 July 2020, on 30 July 2020, the appellant consulted her GP who noted: Letter from WellNZ They have declined claim after MRI. Seems ridiculous as injury showing on MRI is consistent with mechanism of injury, but they state not. [61] The appellant suffered another injury on 12 November 2020 when once again she moved a tetraplegic patient. In this c...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Zakara Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 23 MB]

   ...discretionary activities: (i) E39.8.1 Matters of Discretion (6) and (7); (ii) E39.8.2 Assessment Criteria (6), (7) and (8); (f) H19. Rural zones: (i) H19.7 Rural – Countryside Living Zone H19.7.1 Zone description; (g) Appendix 15 Subdivision information and process: (i) 15.3. Transferable rural site subdivision; (ii) 15.5 Legal protection mechanism to protect indigenous vegetation, wetland or revegetated planting; (iii) 15.6 Restorative planting. 6.4 Zakara also appeals t...

4. OIA-113748.pdf [pdf, 7 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 7 August 2024 Our ref: OIA 113748 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Estimates Thank you for your email of 3 July 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) information about the 2024/25 Estimates hearings. Specifically, you requested: Any briefings, preparation packs, advice, reports, aide...

5. Prasad v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2024] NZACC 182 (18 November 2024) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE AA SINCLAIR [Work Related Gradual Process Injury: s 30 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant, Satend Prasad, made a claim for cover for left glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis as a work-related gradual-process injury (WRGPI). On 9 June 2023, the Corporation declined cover and on 11 October 20...

6. BORA Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Bill [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...protection, preservation and conservation of the historical and cultural heritage of New Zealand. It replaces the Historic Places Act 1993 (the Act), which established the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (Pouhere Taonga) (the Trust) in its current form. The Bill continues the Trust, but changes its name to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga to remove any confusion as to the organisation’s legal status as a Crown entity (and not a trust). 4. The Bill also reforms the Trust’s gove...

7. Nelson Standards Committee v Smith [2018] NZLCDT 34 [pdf, 171 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZLCDT 34 LCDT 002/18 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NELSON STANDARDS COMMITTEE OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND RODERICK ALLAN SMITH Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS Ms A Callinan Mr S Hunter Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith DATE OF HEARING 28 September 2018 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckl...

8. H & Anor v CAC 20004 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...property was just a surface slip that could do with being planted. He gave her permission to pass out that view and his contact details. She said the other engineering consultant told her essentially the same thing. However, Mrs X totally refutes the claims that she made any assurances about the slip or what was contained in the Geo-Tech report. [56] Mr X put it that the Geo-Tech report was mentioned only as a reference source to obtain expert views on the slip and was mentioned by...

9. Race-Relations-Commissioner_June-Release_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...time the Commission’s housing inquiry was considered by the eliminating poverty programme committee and acknowledges that this gave rise to a perceived conflict of interest. More generally. Commissioners and staff also receive, from time to time, a request to update their formal declaration form if their interests have changed. Based on the information provided by his accountant during the Commission’s inquiries into the matter, I note that the quantum of payments received by MY Gold...

10. ARC76/06 AC-37/07 Yong v Chin [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...were somewhat deficient I allowed the matter to be set down at the callover so that there were no further delays in bringing this challenge to a conclusion. A detailed statement of defence has been filed to the rather poorly pleaded statement of claim. No cross challenge has been filed. However, as the challenge seeks a hearing de novo against the whole of the determination, it is open to the Court to increase the awards if the plaintiff is unsuccessful. I also mention that whil...