Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12864 items matching your search terms

  1. OIA-111025.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 29 April 2024 Our ref: OIA 111025 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Health, Safety and Wellbeing documents Thank you for your email of 30 March 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministry of Justice’s (the Ministry) health, safety and wellbeing st...

  2. Gangs-Legislation-Amendment-Bill-Escalating-Penalties_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...Escalating Penalties Amendment Paper Date of issue: 11 September 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circu lar CO (23) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be re leased . Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it....

  3. Traumatic Brain Injury and people in the justice system: Research paper [pdf, 847 KB]

    ...is known about prevalence of TBI for other parts of the justice system. This paper explores the extent of recorded TBI prior to interaction with the justice system. ‘Recorded’ refers to TBI cases resulting in hospitalisation or where an ACC claim was accepted. This means prevalence rates in this report will underestimate the true extent of TBI, since there are people who experience a TBI and are not admitted to hospital and do not make an ACC claim. This analysis was conducted in...

  4. Saraswat v Chase-Seymour [2012] NZIACDT 25 (29 May 2012) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...Chase- Seymour. Mr Saraswat sought Ms Chase-Seymour’s advice regarding immigration issues. [2] They disagree regarding whether there was to be a fee for this consultation. [3] Mr Saraswat says they had a preliminary discussion regarding a potential application for residence; and she told him there would be no fee, but he was charged $250. [4] Ms Chase-Seymour says she charges an initial consultation fee, as some potential clients otherwise get free advice, and then undertake the work...

  5. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 v Revell [2022] NZLCDT 40 (9 November 2022) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 40 LCDT 020/21 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WAIKATO BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND WAYNE JOHN REVELL Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr S Hunter KC Ms K King Ms M Noble Prof D Scott HEARING 3 November 2022 HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, A...

  6. [2018] NZSSAA 52 (12 October 2018) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...in person R. Shaw, counsel, for the Ministry of Social Development DECISION Background [1] XXXX (the appellant) appeals the decision made on 10 July 2017 by the Chief Executive, upheld by a Benefits Review Committee, to decline his application for an emergency benefit. This appeal does not raise any factual dispute. The sole issue is whether the appellant met the criteria for an emergency benefit at the time he applied. [2] The appellant is 28 years old with no de...

  7. [2024] NZEnvC 164 Barbican Securities Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BARBICAN SECURITIES LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000214) Appellant/ Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge L J Semple sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: In Chambers at Wellington (on the papers) Last case event: 23 May 2024 Date of Decision: 10 July 2024 Date o...

  8. LCRO 77/2015 EAB v FBC (7 July 2017) [pdf, 94 KB]

    LCRO 77/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN EAB Applicant AND FBC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of some parties in this decision have been changed. The Applicants name is published. Introduction [1] Mr EAB has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standar...

  9. Lam v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Austin [2018] NZREADT 43 [pdf, 439 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 43 READT 005/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN PETER PHUONG MINH LAM Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) First respondent AND JIANINE (DI) AUSTIN Second respondent Hearing: 6 August 2018, at Wellington Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Mr N O’Conn...

  10. I v J [2016] NZIACDT 15 (24 March 2016) [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...appropriate outcome on the evidence before the Tribunal. Rehearing [6] The Tribunal issued a decision upholding this complaint on the grounds presented by the Registrar in her Statement of Complaint. Mr J applied for a rehearing. He supported the application on the grounds: [6.1] He posted a statement of reply to the Tribunal, using a correct postal address and in a timely manner. [6.2] Without the statement of reply, the Tribunal could not justly determine the complaint. [6.3] Th...