12899 items matching your search terms
LCRO 148/2013 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of a Standards Committee BETWEEN CL and ZA Applicant AND GU Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr CL and Mr ZA (the lawyers) have applied for a review of a decision by a Standards Committee determining that t...
...pleasant business relationship for the large part of the transaction. [7.2] He agreed to pay $3,500 in accordance with an agreement. [7.3] The services were performed, and additional services provided. [7.4] The Complainant refused to pay the fees claimed in full. [7.5] The Complainant “got the bargain that he paid for”. [7.6] The Adviser has incurred administrative costs. Decision Other complaints [8] I note the Adviser is the subject of a series of independent complaints,...
...AUCKLAND [2013][2013] NZEmpC 115 [26 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 115 ARC 38/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN ALLAN WEBB Plaintiff AND SAPPHIRE HOSE Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed by the defendant on 19 June 2013 and received at Court for the plaintiff on 11...
...[2014] NZEmpC 14 [12 February 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 14 CRC 10/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN THE SALAD BOWL LIMITED Plaintiff AND AMBERLEIGH HOWE-THORNLEY Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed by defendant on 11 and 13 September 2013 Appearances: Brya...
[2022] NZPSPLA 0018 Case Number 007054 / 2020 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint filed under application the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 against EREISKY LAFAELE HEARD by telephone on 19 May 2022 APPEARANCES J Anderson, the complainant with J Gardner & R Parker E Lafaele – no appearance written response only DECISION [1] Janine Anderson works for Ereisky Lafaele’s former security employer. She laid a complaint against Mr Lafael...
...later, or where the underlying purpose of taking the car was “joy riding”. The unlawful taking of vehicles can therefore also be charged under s 226 of the Crimes Act 1961, which creates liability for taking a vehicle dishonestly and without claim of right, “but not so as to be guilty of theft”. That provision does not require proof of an intent to permanently deprive. 4. The Bill seeks to amend the offence of robbery in the Crimes Act (s 234) by inserting the words “or unl...
...practitioner is an important factor when appropriate (B v B HC Auckland HC4/92, 6 April 1993). In Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee (HC Auckland CIV-2007- 404-1818, 13 August 2007), the Court stressed when imposing sanctions in the disciplinary process applicable to that case, that it was necessary to consider the “alternatives available short of removal and explain why lesser options have not been adopted in the circumstances of the case”. [21] The purpose of professional disci...
...incurred since March 2017 and does not involve any recovery of costs for preparatory work undertaken by Council staff. The supporters seek the sum of $2,727.80. [6] The GA & SJ Comes Partnership opposes the making of any orders for costs, claiming that they were worn down by the actions of the Council. [7] The basis on which the Court will consider applications for costs are very well settled. The Courts Practice Note of 2014 at 6.6(a) specifically provides: Where an appeal is...
ERUERA-MORRISON V NZ POST AK AC46A/07 1 November 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC46A/07 ARC 79/06 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge to a determination AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN PIXIE ERUERA-MORRISON Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND POST Defendant Hearing: Submissions received from defendant 3 September 2007 Submissons received from the plaintiff on 23 September 2007 Judgment: 1 November 2007 COSTS JUDG...
...suffered an accident at work. There is some inconsistency as to how he sustained the injury due to the various ways the accident is recorded in his clinical records. However, on 3 December 2015, AON accepted cover for a lumbar sprain based on the claim form submitted by his general practitioner, Dr Weeramuni, that said Mr Shaftyat had a probable lumbar sprain and sciatica. [3] Dr Weeramuni’s records show that Mr Shaftyat has a history of back issues dating back to 2007 and ha...