11323 items matching your search terms
...34. I am satisfied that the costs claimed are justified and reasonable. 35. For these reasons I find that EI is to pay J Ltd the sum of $12,198.48. Referee: K Johnson Date: 12 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...
...contribute to the costs. I therefore find U Ltd not liable to contribute towards the cost of the fence. 9. In view of the above, the claim must be dismissed. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 27 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...to the failure to provide a hotel room. 10. For these reasons MB is to pay TO the sum of $2,779.54, and TA the sum of $640.00, by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 5 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...balance of probabilities that the respondent’s actions caused the collision and therefore the application must be dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 24 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...or an inherent defect of the vehicle? (iii) If there is a breach of contract then what loss has B Ltd suffered? Was there a contract between DT and B Ltd Ltd? 5. The relevant law is the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017. A contract is formed when parties agree on the terms and conditions under which goods or services will be provided. 6. DT claims that the contract for the courtesy car was between her ex-husband TI and B Ltd as it was him and not her who ‘picked up’ th...
...a. Is IB entitled to cancel the contract and not pay for services? b. If not, is the amount claimed reasonable? Is IB entitled to cancel the contract and not pay for services? 3. When two parties exchange something of value a contract is formed. In order to be bound by a contract, both parties must be certain about the essential terms of the contract. In this case the terms of the contract are in a written document titled “Valuation Agreement” dated 31 May 2022 and signed by...
...exclusive possession of any parts of the property. There is no question that this was the basis on which the house was owned. The evidence of this is the lawyer’s file notes and a written statement in which HK gifted $100,000 to IQ. This also informs a presumption that costs will be shared. 16. I find that there was an agreed position that the parties would pay even shares for the mortgage payments, rates and outgoings (the Contributions). This is because: a. cl C. of the Deed r...
...a staff of 98, five of whom were members of the plaintiff union employed under a collective agreement which was about to expire. The plaintiff initiated bargaining for the renewal of the collective agreement and at one point it made a written request of the defendant, pursuant to s 34 of the Act, for disclosure of its most recent accounts and other financial information. The request was rejected by the defendant principally upon the grounds that, in terms of s 32(1)(e) of the Act,...
...which he advised that the finance was conditional on a WOF, the communications thereafter were between KC, the broker and the finance company. UD say that his text reply to KC on or about 9 July 2021 was on the basis that KC had supplied all of the information required by [the broker] and [the financier]. 13. I find that it is more likely than not that finance was not approved for the following reasons: (a) UD says it was not approved. (b) There is an email from UD to KC dated 25 Ju...
...APPLICANTS BM and FM RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent is changed from O Ltd to W Ltd. 2. W Ltd is to pay $2,506.46 to BM and FM by 31 January 2024. 3. The evidence provided by W Ltd in the document ‘Information and Submissions’ received by the [City 1] District Court on 1 December 2023 and provided to the Tribunal in the hearing of 19 December 2023 is suppressed pursuant to s20A of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 and may not be published.