Search Results

1. LCRO 10/2016 CT v WN (31 October 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...Downs Syndrome. For a number of years until 1990, he suffered sexual abuse perpetrated by a family member. As a result of this he suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and requires specialist treatment and constant supervision. ACC accepted a claim in 1993 for compensation as a result of his post-traumatic stress disorder but repeatedly refused to approve and pay for more than 13 hours of attendant care. Mrs CT had undertaken the attendant care of RT without compensation....

2. BC v TH Ltd [2024] NZDT 658 (16 August 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 658 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT TH Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks compensation following the supply and installation of a solar system in her house bus in 2021. The solar system as ins...

3. UL v PT [2022] NZDT 276 (23 December 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 276 APPLICANT UL RESPONDENT PT The Tribunal orders: 1. PT is to pay to UL the sum of $375.00 on or before 10 February 2023. Reasons 1. UL rented a room in PT’s home. When he left, PT held onto the bond of $400.00. UL filed a claim seeking the return of the bond, plus costs ($600.00). PT sought cleaning costs and repa...

4. BR v YD LCRO 64 / 2011 (9 May 2011) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...following:- (a) That he was not aware of the increases in the Respondent’s hourly charge-out rates; (b) that the Respondent had previously failed to file and follow-up with the Courts to ensure filing had been processed in time; (c) that he had requested that the Applicant cease work on the statute- barred issue and any further work on the file in a telephone conversation following receipt of a memorandum from the Respondent on [date] July 2009. (d) the failure to follow up with t...

5. TX v UQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 355 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 163 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 355 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT UQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TX claims that, on 28 September 2023, his car was damaged by a runaway trolley when his wife was about to leave the car park of the [supermarket]. He seeks $711.25, comprising repair costs and his $45.00 filing fee, from the owner of the super...

6. NL v XS [2024] NZDT 320 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 82 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 320 APPLICANT NL RESPONDENT XS The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons 1. In 2021, NL lodged a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. Following the hearing in January 2022, the case was adjourned because XS was preparing a complaint to the District Law Society against NL regarding their service. At that time the Disputes Tribunal believed th...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 5 Hatcher v Burgess Crowley Civil Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 5 EMPC 310/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application as to scope of challenge BETWEEN SHANE HATCHER Plaintiff AND BURGESS CROWLEY CIVIL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: L Hansen, counsel for plaintiff T Wano, cou...

8. QL Ltd v JM Ltd [2023] NZDT 397 (5 September 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 397 APPLICANT QL Ltd RESPONDENT JM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant claims that its [van] was damaged during a break in at his premises on or about the 28 July 2022. The applicant took his vehicle to [auto mechanic] for repair. [Auto mechanic] quoted $7,179....

9. DX v E Ltd & DH [2024] NZDT 774 (17 September 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 774 APPLICANT DX RESPONDENT E Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT DH The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. DX is to collect the joinery from E Ltd on or before 30 September 2024, unless the parties reach an agreement that it can be returned for a lesser refund. Reasons 1. DX purchased some joinery for a price of $11,690.00...

10. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2024] NZDT 18 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim BU RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against B Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 14 September 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. I held a teleconference hearing today to establish if a reheari...