Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12515 items matching your search terms

  1. LM v JD & TD [2022] NZDT 6 (8 March 2022) [pdf, 224 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 6 APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT JD SECOND RESPONDENT TD The Tribunal orders: The claim and the counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons 1. LM owns [address 1] (property one). JD and TD (the respondents) own the adjoining property at [address 2] (property two). 2. On or about 21 March 2021 LM served a fencing n...

  2. C Ltd & HN v G Ltd & GX [2024] NZDT 1 (3 January 2024) [pdf, 251 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 1 APPLICANTS C Ltd HN RESPONDENT G Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT GX The Tribunal orders: 1. G Ltd is to pay C Ltd $2387.50 on or before 20 January 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. Reasons: 1. HN, the sole director of C Ltd, provides workshops and coaching for self-devel

  3. CEIT Annual Report 2022 [pdf, 446 KB]

    ...arising from the Canterbury earthquakes. The Tribunal has now had three years’ experience handling and resolving claims and has developed robust processes to resolve these, often difficult, disputes. [3] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is limited, applications can only be considered if: (a) the applicant was an owner of the property at the time it was damaged by any of the earthquakes experienced in Canterbury between 4 September 2010 and 31 December 2011 (the sequence); (b) at t...

  4. AAX and AAY as Trustees of AP Trust v ZZF Ltd [2010] NZDT 18 (13 August 2010) [pdf, 87 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2010] NZDT 18 BETWEEN AAX AND FIRST APPLICANT AAY SECOND APPLICANT AND ZZF RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 August 2010 Referee: Referee Robertshawe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZZF Limited is to pay to AAX and AAY the sum of $1,025.52 on or before Friday, 20 August 2010. Facts [1] In 2006, AAX and AAY purchased an ins

  5. [2012] NZEmpC 177 Rimene v P J Doherty & Natusch Group Ltd [pdf, 61 KB]

    ...any party to a matter before the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) who is dissatisfied with the determination of the Authority or any part of such determination may elect to have the matter heard by the Court by filing a statement of claim in the prescribed manner within 28 days after the date of the determination in question. [2] In a minute dated 24 May 2012, Chief Judge Colgan confirmed that Mr Rimene had filed an application seeking an extension of time in which to...

  6. MT v EB [2023] NZDT 508 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 239 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 508 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT EB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MT purchased a saddle after seeing it advertised on EB’s [online] account. After her successful bid, she contacted EB on 6 February and asked her to “look at postage to [City] plea...

  7. EX v TY [2022] NZDT 273 (16 December 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...of probabilities that TY has not breached the guarantees under the CGA, and EX is not entitled to claim a refund of $3,925.10. Accordingly, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Fuli Date: 16 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  8. Redruth v Dereham LCRO 154 / 2010 (10 November 2010) [pdf, 132 KB]

    LCRO 154/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN MR REDRUTH on behalf of ETL Applicant AND MR DEREHAM Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The New Zealand Law Society received a complaint from Mr Redruth (the Applicant)...

  9. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 485 APPLICANT EI APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. M Ltd is to pay EI and MQ $6,000.00 on or before 19 July 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EI and MQ purchased a [Queen mattress], split queen base, a mattress protector, [brand] silk pillow including delivery and installat

  10. What happens next

    Acknowledgement of your claim Once we receive your notice of claim, we’ll send you an acknowledgement and a receipt for your application fee. Phone conference & directions hearing The Authority may hold a phone conference before the hearing to make sure everyone has the information they need. It may also arrange a directions hearing to ensure progress is being made on the claim. The hearing Time & place At least 10 days before your case is due to be heard, we’ll tell you the day and...