Search Results

1. Borst v ACC [2014] NZACA 8 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...of the Authority to hear and determine the appeal. 2 The issues: substantive appeal [3] The appeal is brought against the Review Officer’s finding that Mr Borst did not have cover for mental consequences in terms of his covered claim under the 1972 Act and primarily involves evaluating the competing opinions of Dr Wilkinson for ACC and Dr Cordyre, a psychiatrist instructed by Mr Darke for the review hearing, who diagnosed Mr Borst as suffering from mental consequences...

2. New Zealands all-of-Government response to organised crime [pdf, 413 KB]

   ...Ministry of Health, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ministry for Social Development, Ministry for Consumer Affairs, and Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully ex...

3. Nelson Standards Committee v Webb [2011] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 159 KB]

   IN THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZLCDT 2 LCDT 006/10 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NELSON STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND STEPHEN LAWRENCE DELAMERE WEBB of Nelson, Lawyer Respondent CHAIR Mr D J Mackenzie MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr Peter Radich Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith REPRESENTATION Mr P Whiteside for the Nelson Standards Committee Mr Paul...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 173 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED v MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 173 [20 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 173 EMPC 333/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for an injunction BETWEEN LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED Applicant AND MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED Respondent Hearing: 19 December 2016 (heard at Wellington) Appearances: R Tow...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 44 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & SFWU [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...11-14 April 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Rob Towner, counsel for plaintiff Garry Pollak, counsel for defendant Timothy Oldfield, counsel for intervener Judgment: 18 May 2011 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff claims to be legally entitled to transfer from his previous employment to new employment with the defendant (LSG) which has recently obtained a catering contract to service Singapore Airlines (SQ) at the expense of a previous contractor. T...

6. Stewart v CAC10064 & Cooper [2013] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...commission from the eventual sale of the property to the purchasers, which was effected by Eves. Coopers alleged that Eves knew of the subsistence of the Coopers agency, but went ahead and completed the sale to the purchasers regardless, and then claimed and received the commission from the vendors. The 10 February 2012 Committee Decision 3 [11] The CAC considered that Coopers had a valid agency agreement signed on 8 December 2009; no evidence had been put before it to sugg...

7. Kim & Anor v Auckland Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 28 [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...in 2001-2002. There were substantial defects in the original construction that have caused significant moisture ingress and damage. A full re-clad of the house is now required. [2] At a mediation in April 2013, Mr and Mrs Kim settled their claims against the Auckland Council, the first respondent. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Mr and Mrs Kim subrogated to the Council their full entitlement to recover damages from the other respondents. [3] The Council paid to Mr a...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...misconduct. [91] There were two additional matters that concerned Mr Gaddum. The first of these was Captain Hines’ explanations about his movements while the Seamount Explorer came into berth, and the second was with respect to Mr Gaddum’s request for the SMS audit report. [92] Captain Hines accepts that an employer may expand a disciplinary process to include alleged untruthfulness in the employee’s explanations, provided the process is fair and the employee is given a...

9. [2017] NZEnvC 053 Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Mackenzie District Council [pdf, 17 MB]

   ...decision issued; First (Interim) Decision6 issued by the court as High Country Rosehip Ltd and Mackenzie Lifestyle Limited v Mackenzie District Council ("High Country Rosehip") [7] Because PC13 was notified before 1 September 2009, the applicable version of the Act is? the RMA prior to the 2009 and 2013 and subsequent amendments. [8] In the First Decision8 the Environment Court judged that the Mackenzie Basin is an outstanding natural landscape. We then proposed change...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 6 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ Inc [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...Union’s evidence was not contradicted at this interlocutory stage. He argued that it was not up to the Union to prove anything; the onus to establish the allegations was on LPC, not MUNZ. He submitted that there was no basis for the plaintiff’s claim as put in the first instance. He also submitted that there had been numerous strikes over various weekends in January which had taken place without any question as to whether there had been compliance with the secret ballot provi...