Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Strategic Direction 2014-2025 [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...by Lithoprint Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand Illustrations Page iv : Tribunal chairperson Chief Judge Wilson Isaac Page v : Waitangi Tribunal Unit acting director Julie Tangaere Page vi : The Waitangi Tribunal, March 2014 Page 2 : Mangatū remedies claim hearing, Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae, Gisborne, June 2012 Page 5 : Cover of Ko Aotearoa Tēnei : A Report into Claims Concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity, Te Taumata Tuatahi Page 6 : Cover of The...

2. Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees [2024] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...several 1 This decision is to be cited as Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees [2024] NZHRRT 4. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 4 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 information privacy requests to the Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (the Board) following a complaint they had made to the Board. [2] The Board refused the information privacy requests and the requested information was not provided until approximate...

3. EN v IX Ltd [2022] NZDT 223 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 94 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 223 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT IX Ltd The Tribunal orders: EN’s application is dismissed. EN is to pay IX Ltd the sum of $4,595.01 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 11 May 2022, the parties entered into an agreement for the manufacture and installation of two windows and a set of French d...

4. HN v CN [2024] NZDT 20 (22 January 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 20 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT CN The Tribunal orders: CN is to pay the sum of $980.00 to HN by no later than 16 February 2024. Reasons: 1. CN booked a 3 night stay at a beach house owned by HN at [Location]. The tariff for the house was $245 per night for two people, with an additional $70 per person per night payable for more than t...

5. TE & EE v UO [2024] NZDT 324 (1 May 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 324 APPLICANT TE and EE RESPONDENT UO The Tribunal orders: UO is to pay TE and EE $30,000.00 within 28 days. UO did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] The essential facts were not in dispute, and I shall summarise them only briefly. TE and EE were guarantors for the financial obligations of a company called G Ltd to S Ltd. Du...

6. IH v QM [2024] NZDT 389 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 389 APPLICANT IH RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay IH the sum of $11,948.00 on or before 26 June 2024. Reasons: 1. QM listed a [car] on [platform] for $1.00 reserve. 2. IH bid on the auction. Shortly before the auction ended the two highest bids were removed, leaving IH the winner of the auction. 3. IH was concern

7. BE v YV [2014] NZDT 558 (22 May 2014) [pdf, 65 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 558 BETWEEN BE APPLICANT AND YV RESPONDENT Date of Order: 22 May 2014 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed Reasons [1] On 25 February 2011, BE paid $20,000.00 into the bank account of ABC Ltd (ABC) by way of a loan. At that time he was employed by ABC, and his friend YV was director of ABC. He also paid over $13...

8. AM v JO Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 496 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 496 APPLICANT AM RESPONDENT JO Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT MA THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT TA The Tribunal orders: 1. JO Ltd is to pay AM the sum of $2,000.00 on or before 25 June 2024. 2. The claim against MA and TA is dismissed. Reasons: 1. AM brought this claim against JO LtdJO LTD for $7,225.00 on the basis that h...

9. Tabram v Slater [pdf, 19 KB]

   ...respondents’ application for costs was dismissed in the Tribunal’s substantive decision, this determination is based on the remaining costs applications by the second respondent (Ojo Limited) and fourth respondent (Mineral Plaster Technologies Limited). Claims for Costs Application by Ojo Limited (Ojo) Ojo applied for costs against the claimants and the second respondents (Slaters) on the following grounds: • The claim by the Slaters that they relied on Ojo’s plans and specifi...

10. BH v YS and YSY [2013] NZDT 430 (21 March 2013) [pdf, 193 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 430 BETWEEN BH APPLICANT AND YS RESPONDENT AND YSY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 21 March 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the case is struck out for lack of jurisdiction and referred to the Tenancy Tribunal This order is made in the absence of the first respondent and pursuant to section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act...