Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 213 Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...A: The appeal is refused, and consent therefore also refused. B: Costs are reserved. Any application is to be made within 15 working days of this decision; response(s) within a further 15 working days. Contents The proposal, the site and the applications ....................................................................... 6 Section 104 RMA ................................................................................................................ 12 Effects on the environment...

2. LCRO 116/2015 QO v Standards Committee (14 June 2018) [pdf, 208 KB]

   LCRO 116/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN QO Applicant AND [AREA] STANDARDS COMMITTEE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms QO has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (t...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 31 Ahuja and ors v Labour Inspector MBIE [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 23 December 2016.1 That determination was in respect of a collateral issue which had arisen in the substantive proceedings between the parties. The substantive proceedings involved claims for minimum wage and holiday pay entitlements by ex-employees of the companies now in liquidation, named as second and third plaintiffs. Those proceedings had been commenced in the Authority by the Labour Inspector who is now defendan...

4. [2021] NZACC 126 - Botha v ACC (4 August 2021) [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...diagnosed moderate hearing loss, feeding difficulties and failing to grow. Kevin has required ongoing additional assistance and therapy ever since. Much of this has been carried out by his parents. [7] Dr Katie Tuck completed a treatment injury claim for Kevin on 5 July 2016. She described the treatment injury as management of the birth process. That Kevin suffered an injury at birth suggesting a significant hypoxic event during labour was not detected by attending staff. ACC�...

5. E72 Ngarimu Blair - EIC - Ngāti Whātua Orākei [pdf, 969 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2018-AKL-000078 I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of direct referral of an application for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF NGAR...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 142 Kwik Kiwi Cars Ltd T/A Mark Cromie Motor Group v Crossley [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...intended relocation of MCH to another site without approved signage being available. This was ordered in mid- January 2019, but it was not expected to arrive from Australia until late April 2019. b) Second, New Zealand Transport Agency required an application to relocate MCH’s authorised warrant of fitness status from Hannah Street to Port Road. This could not be obtained prior to the date of settlement. [12] Consequently, an immediate transfer of the MCH operation and amalgam...

7. E v IAG New Zealand Ltd (3rd decision – quantum) [2019] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 596 KB]

   1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0013-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN PFWE AND JEE Applicant AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND AND INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Second Respondent QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND...

8. LCRO 28/2017 HK v TX (31 May 2019) [pdf, 205 KB]

   LCRO 28/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN HK Applicant AND TX Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms HK has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee) to take no fur...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 35 Tan v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...employment under Part 6A of the Act, was issued on 9 August 2012 and I considered it had relevance to the issues which were required to be determined in the present matter. Counsel were provided with the opportunity to make further submissions on the applicability of the Supreme Court decision and did so. These have been taken into account in this judgment. This all, however, contributed to the delay in resolving this matter. Factual findings [5] Mr Pollak, in his closing sub...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 019 Willowridge Developments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 10 MB]

    ...than 3 m in all areas. The appellant opposes the Council's arnendments to the conditions as an increase from 70% to 85% is not necessary, and it is impractical to expect 85% of the plants to survive and be in a healthy condition. It is also claiming that it is not appropriate to require plants to grow to 3 m in all areas as many of the plants identified do not grow to that height. [18] The Council considers that the condition should be retained as6 : 5 6 (a) the appellant...