Search Results

1. CAC20003 v Sue [2015] NZREADT 87 [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...referred to at paragraph two, the clients contacted the defendant by telephone, text message and email. The defendant did not respond to the clients’ attempts to communicate with him about the rental monies owed to them. On 1 March 2013, the clients requested that the defendant contact them or deposit the outstanding amount into their bank account by 7 March 2013. The defendant failed to respond. 4. On 8 March 2013, the clients terminated the property management agreement. 5. T...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 052 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A­ RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer Environment Commissioner J A Hodges On the papers Mr D Allen and Ms E Bennett for the Tararna District Council (TDC) Mr N Jessen for the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (Regional Council) Mr A Warr...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 186 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...should be considered when assessing a restricted discretionary activity; future possible implications of the Alternative Solution for resource consents; possible future plan changes to the Unitary Plan; the Council's process with respect to an application for resource consent for the Buchanan Street property; and the Hearing Panel Recommendations and reasons and the Council's Decision. [5] After careful consideration of all the material before us we conclude that we have...

4. [2006] NZEmpC CC 11/06 Michael Pearcy Investments Ltd v Miller [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...[1] The sole issue for decision by the Court in this case was the nature of the working relationship between the parties. [2] Between 2001 and 2004, the defendant’s services were provided to the plaintiff by another company. The defendant claimed that, from February 2004, she became an employee of the plaintiff. On this basis, she issued proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority seeking remedies arising out of the termination of the relationship in early 2005. [3] T...

5. [2024] NZREADT 05 CAC v Pang (6 March 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...handwrote an initial for the vendor on each page. This included handwriting the initial against each of the “Client Acknowledgments”. In July and August 2021, Mr Pang did the same on the property checklist, the Pre-Auction Offer-Vendor’s Form, the Memorandum of Contract and on the Particulars and Conditions of Sale of Real Estate by Auction. The property was eventually withdrawn from sale. [6] As a result of his conduct on this transaction, the agency terminated Mr Pang’s...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 82 Goodfellow v Building Connexion Ltd t/a ITM Building Centre [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...[2] Mr Goodfellow believed he had been dismissed and that his dismissal was unjustifiable. He pursued a personal grievance to that effect. The Employment Relations Authority determined1 that Mr Goodfellow had not been dismissed and rejected his claims. Mr Goodfellow challenged that determination and the matter proceeded before me in a hearing de novo. 1 CA 170/09 9 October 2009 [3] The company owns and operates a buildin...

7. Hunstanton v Cambourne and Chester LCRO 167 / 2009 (10 February 2010) [pdf, 71 KB]

   LCRO 167 / 2009 An application for review pursuant CONCERNING to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay Of Plenty Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society BETWEEN MS HUNSTANTON Applicant AND MR CAMBORNE and MR CHESTER Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Mrs Hunstanton complained to the...

8. LCRO 25/2016 RZ v LB [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 25/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RZ Applicant AND LB Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr RZ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] to take no further ac...

9. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   LCRO 318/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Standards Committee BETWEEN AC Applicants AND FV and HU Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr and Mrs AC have applied for a review of the determination by Standards Committee to take no further action in resp...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 207 Arohanui Hospice Service Trust v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...subject to the MECA and are now subject to the SECA: (a) those who have agreed to work on specified days of the week and on specified shifts on or across those days. These specified days and shifts are individual terms and conditions of the applicable part-time employees and set out in the letters of acceptance of employment; and (b) those who have agreed on individual terms and conditions of their employment (and as contained in their letters of acceptance of employment) to wo...