12922 items matching your search terms
IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEI-0056-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN A G Applicant AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent AND VERO INSURANCE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Second Respondent Appearances: K Robinson, M Hills and T Sauni for Applicant N Walker and E Light for First Respondent A Durrant for Second Respondent FINAL DECISION OF P R COGSWELL...
...Court Victim Advisors as to who advises the victim of the court outcome in each ‘specified offence’ (as defined by section 29 Victims Rights Act 2002) bail hearing. It seems to depend on the circumstances of the hearing and whether the person has requested notifications. If it is a specified offence and bail was opposed by the prosecutor it is the role of Police, but if bail was unopposed it is the role of the Court Victim Advisor. It would be preferable for one agency to have respon...
...children and adults. A more recent finding, from the work of Ceci and his colleagues (e.g. Ceci & Bruck, 1996), is that the impact of such questioning may spill over into a child's subsequent spontaneous statements, such that the child may claim that a non-existent event occurred and even include spurious supportive detail to back up this claim. There is usually no question of the child's intending to mislead; the statements are made with evident sincerity, but appear to be bas...
...(Reinstating three strikes) Amendment Bill Date of issue: 06 August 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it...
...considered further written submissions from the parties on the question of compliance of the employee protection provision (EPP) with the statute. [2] I note that Mr Yukich purported to file a further brief of evidence of Mr Moengaroa in the form of a sworn affidavit dated 22 June 2009 but in the absence of any application for leave to admit that evidence or consent by the defendant to its filing, I have not taken it into account. [3] I regret the delay in delivering th...
...Sector Act’). The amendment to one section in the Crown Entities Act includes a consequential technical amendment to two schedules in the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000. 5. At present there are differing thresholds and powers applicable to investigations undertaken by the State Services Commission (‘the Commission’), depending upon whether the investigation is in relation to the core Public Service or the wider State services. This Bill puts in place a single in...
...Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer Environment Commissioner J A Hodges On the papers Mr D Allen and Ms E Bennett for the Tararna District Council (TDC) Mr N Jessen for the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (Regional Council) Mr A Warr...
...should be considered when assessing a restricted discretionary activity; future possible implications of the Alternative Solution for resource consents; possible future plan changes to the Unitary Plan; the Council's process with respect to an application for resource consent for the Buchanan Street property; and the Hearing Panel Recommendations and reasons and the Council's Decision. [5] After careful consideration of all the material before us we conclude that we have...
...referred to at paragraph two, the clients contacted the defendant by telephone, text message and email. The defendant did not respond to the clients’ attempts to communicate with him about the rental monies owed to them. On 1 March 2013, the clients requested that the defendant contact them or deposit the outstanding amount into their bank account by 7 March 2013. The defendant failed to respond. 4. On 8 March 2013, the clients terminated the property management agreement. 5. T...
...[1] The sole issue for decision by the Court in this case was the nature of the working relationship between the parties. [2] Between 2001 and 2004, the defendant’s services were provided to the plaintiff by another company. The defendant claimed that, from February 2004, she became an employee of the plaintiff. On this basis, she issued proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority seeking remedies arising out of the termination of the relationship in early 2005. [3] T...