Search Results

1. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Medlicott [2024] NZLCDT 34 (23 October 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 34 LCDT 012/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER MEDLICOTT Practitioner CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr I Hunt Mr H Matthews Ms M Noble Ms I Taylor HEARING 16 September 2024 HELD AT Christchurch District Court DATE OF DECI...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 179 Drader v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...either need to make an appointment or could sit and wait for a case manager. The plaintiff said it would be a long wait as the office was busy and other clients had appointments and had not yet been seen. The plaintiff provided client A with a form to complete and she was not aware when client A left the office. [4] Client A returned on Friday, 4 February and the plaintiff was again acting in the role of receptionist for what was anticipated would be a busy day. Her intention w...

3. Tucker v CAC 20006 & Claydon [2012] NZREADT 46 [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...clients made the following acknowledgement: • He acknowledged that there was no bias or acknowledgement of bias against the Tribunal in connection with Mr Denley remaining a part of the Tribunal. His clients agreed that they would waive all claims of bias against the Tribunal in this matter. The Tribunal therefore records this acknowledgement and on that basis agreed to proceed. The Appeal [4] This appeal arises from a complaint by one agent against the second and third res...

4. Victim-led alternative resolution pathways [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...encompassing societal victimisation brought about by the State, or as a result of civil or inter-nation war; consequently, the scope has been restricted largely to alternative justice processes that respond to (i) criminal offending, and (ii) are applicable to individual victims of crime (rather than groups of society victimised by State or war crimes). The primary aim is to identify and review victim-led alternative resolution pathways. While these receive most attention, also exa...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v O'Boyle [2021] NZLCDT 15 (29 April 2021) [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...PARAGRAPH [125] OF THIS DECISION. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 15 LCDT 021/20 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND LYNETTE O’BOYLE Practitioner DEPUTY CHAIR Judge J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms A Callinan Ms N McMahon Mr S Morris Ms S Stuart DATE OF HEARING 29 and 30 March 2021 HELD AT District Court...

6. Evidential Overview for Christchurch Masjid attacks [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...service in particular. At Appendix A is a timeline of events on 15 March 2019 and at Appendix B is a map showing the movements of the individual that day. At Heading 9, the Overview sets out the types of information that can be made available on request to next of kin about the deceased victims of the terrorist attacks. Hearings and findings in other proceedings 1.4 On 27 August 2020, the individual was sentenced by the High Court in Christchurch to life imprisonment without parole...

7. Regulatory Impact Statement Enabling Service Transformation in Courts and Tribunals [pdf, 77 KB]

   RIS - Enabling service transformation in Courts and Tribunals 1 Regulatory Impact Statement Enabling Service Transformation in Courts and Tribunals Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of proposals to enable and govern the use of electronic technology in courts and tribunals. The proposed changes are expected to benefit court users and the public more generally by removi

8. Director of Proceedings v Nelson [2013] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...in which treatment given [164] THE REQUIRED STANDARD OF CARE [170] Preliminary [170] Identifying the standard [171] Whether other approaches helpful [176] Six general principles of health care [178] THE BREACHES ALLEGED IN THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM – FINDINGS [180] First breach – Right 4(1) [180] Second breach – Right 4(2) [189] Third breach – Right 4(3) [198] Fourth breach – Right 4(4) [208] Fifth breach – Right 4(5) [211] Sixth breach – Right 6(1) [213] Seven...

9. Eru v Kīngi - Whakapoungakau 24 (2014) 101 Waiariki MB 1 (101 WAR 1) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20140007434 UNDER Sections 40, 67, 98 and 237 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF WHAKAPOUNGAKAU 24 BETWEEN TAI ERU Applicant AND WIREMU KÏNGI Applicant Hearings: 1, 23 and 25 July 2014 (By telephone conference) Appearances: F Geiringer, for Tai Eru D Dowthwaite...

10. Vaerla v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 3 (29 January 2014) [pdf, 87 KB]

    ...basis for those bases of complaint was: [3.1] The adviser did not have any contact with the complainant. [3.2] A failure to inform the complainant that the adviser’s practice had moved to a new address. [3.3] The adviser (through a company) claimed credit for the issue of a work visa without performing the work. [3.4] The adviser failed to inform the complainant of progress with an application. [3.5] The adviser failed to refund fees. [4] The Registrar provided an outline of the...