Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. NZCASS 2014 Questionnaire [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...______________________________________________________________________________________________ 20 VICTIM FORM(S) If Q28 to Q43 all = 0 or 98 go to Q146a. Q44 CRIME TYPE will result from the special victim form selection procedure (which will select up to 3 victim forms). Prerequisite [Table listing High, Medium and Low priority offences of each type as specified from Screeners by the Statistical Services Provider for random selection will be needed as background (see bel...

  2. LCRO 62/2017 & LCRO 63/2017 HC and RE v DL (9 January 2020) [pdf, 239 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2020] NZLCRO 2 LCRO 62/2017 LCRO 63/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee BETWEEN HC (LCRO 62/2017) and RE (LCRO 63/2017) Applicants AND DL Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been cha...

  3. Nikau v Rongomau - Whangape Parish Lot 23B Horahora Marae [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 300 (2012 APPEAL 300) [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...Trust (“the Trust”) and took a leading role in the redevelopment project. [3] The redevelopment project encountered serious problems which have left the wharenui unfinished and the marae owing a debt of $500,000.00. Marsha Te Rongomau, the applicant in the lower Court, sought Ms Nikau’s removal and made a range of allegations against her including: that she failed to consult and report to fellow trustees and beneficiaries; that she failed to keep proper accounts; that she...

  4. [2016] NZEmpC 153 Spotless Facility Services NZ Ltd v Mackay [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...frustration because she felt she was being bullied by her co- workers, and her employer was not taking this issue seriously. [2] The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) upheld Ms Mackay’s personal grievance with regard to one aspect of her claim, although it rejected a number of others. It found she had indeed been constructively dismissed. Remedies were awarded. 1 1 Mackay v Spotless Facility Services (NZ) Ltd [201...

  5. Fourth-Universal-Periodic-Review-documents_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 805 KB]

    ...government, it also clarifies that work programmes will be adjusted in line with the new Government’s priorities; 4 approved the final UPR national report, attached as Annex 1 under SOU-24-SUB-0003, for submission to the UN, subject to minor changes requested by the Committee. Rachel Clarke Committee Secretary Present: Officials present from: Hon David Seymour Hon Nicola Willis (Chair) Hon Erica Stanford Hon Paul Goldsmith Hon Louise Upston Hon Mark Mitchell Hon Tama Potaka Hon Matt D...

  7. NLT v Coetzee [2020] NZIACDT 7 (10 February 2020) Sanctions [pdf, 122 KB]

    ...It is plain that no loss to the complainant arose out of the failure of Ms Coetzee to enter into a written client contract with him. [49] Turning then to the incorrect advice Ms Coetzee gave, the issue is whether the various expenses and losses claimed arose in some material way from Ms Coetzee’s erroneous advice. [50] The cost of travelling to New Zealand to work, including professional registration, could not be said to have been incurred or wasted because of the wrong advice....

  8. Win v CAC 407 & Brodie [2016] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 355 KB]

    ...unresolved bathroom consent issue. [8] Settlement occurred on 22 September 2014 (according to the CAC) but according to correspondence before the Tribunal and the Certificate of Title settlement occurred on 22 October 2014. [9] The vendor’s application for the CCC was not submitted to the Wellington City Council (the Council) until a month after the deposit was paid. The property had undergone extensive changes where the second bedroom had been removed by the vendor and renov...

  9. Bullent v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 76 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

  10. Xi v Body Corporate 198693 [2023] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...as Xi v Body Corporate 198693 [2023] NZHRRT 38]. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 38 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] Ms An Li Tao together with her parents Ms Hua Xi and Mr Naizuo Tao were, at all times relevant to this claim, the registered proprietors of one of the units in a unit title development in New Lynn, Auckland. Body Corporate 198693 (Body Corporate) is the body corporate for that development. [2] The plaintiffs allege that the Body Corporate discrim...