Search Results

1. Kennedy v Real Estate Agent Authority (CAC 403) & Lonergan [2016] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Kennedy received virtually no correspondence or information about marketing of the property from the licensee between January 2013 and January 2014. (ii) Complaint 9: That Mr Lonergan compromised Ms Kennedy’s security and insurance cover by requesting the T’s to leave the key inside a small fireplace on the property where it could be accessed by unauthorised persons. (iii) Complaint 12: That licensee Lonergan made comments about the complainant which were defamatory and ther...

2. Payne v CAC 20005 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...deceit, because the price realised on the sale of the property was significantly below the market value of the property at that time. The Complaints [5] On 25 November 2011, the appellant summarise his complaint in the Authority’s complaint form as follows (“the REAA complaint”): “REMAX Leaders in a corrupt unethical and deceitful tender process sold my Karori Wellington home of 26 years at the time in 2005 for an unjust Wellington High Court process to a property speculat...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 175 Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa v Morgan & Wilson [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...contained in a bundle of agreed documents.) Pleadings [7] Having set out the factual position, including the relevant provisions of the first defendants’ employment agreement, the plaintiff seeks the following declarations in its statement of claim: a. The school holiday period 20 December 2010 to 30 January 2011 was a closedown period for the First Defendants; b. The Plaintiff and the First Defendants had not agreed that the periods of unpaid leave taken by the First Defe...

4. [2021] NZREADT 52 - QH v KE, SE & Agency (14 October 2021) [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...respondent. [2] QH made a complaint to the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), the first respondent. A Complaints Assessment Committee (CAC 2103) decided on 8 June 2021 that the listing of the properties included false and misleading information. However, KE and SE had not misled QH as he would have been aware of the true state of the property when the sale became unconditional. Accordingly, the Committee decided to take no further action. QH appeals against that dec...

5. LCRO 57/2017 SD v WP [pdf, 182 KB]

   LCRO 57/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SD Applicant AND WP Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Ms SD has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee) to take...

6. Larkin - Wairau North 2F1 (2008) 124 Whangarei MB 90 (124 WH 90) [pdf, 987 KB]

   ...OF Hearing: 14 March 2008 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 31 March 2008 124 Whangarei MB 90 A20070007918 A20070007919 Section 328, Te TureWhenua Act 1993 Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Act 1993 Wairau North 2Fl HILDA FRANCIS LARKIN Applicant RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER Introduction [1] The Court has before it applications by Hilda Larkin pursuant to section 18(1)(a) ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 ("the Act) to conflnn ownership of a dwelling on Wairau...

7. Family Court (Family Court Associates) Legislation Bill [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...16 (attend a parenting programme). 2 Clause 15. 3 Clause 21. 2 6889243_FAMILY COURT (FAMILY COURT ASSOCIATES) LEGISLATION BILL New Zealand where there are reasonable grounds to believe a person is intending to defeat certain specified applications 6. Amendments to the Family Violence Act 2018 authorise a Family Court Associate to hear and decide objections to a direction to undertake an assessment for a non-violence programme or to attend such a programme or engage with a p...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 024 CSF Trustees v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Lakes District Council S Pierce for S R F Knowles as a section 274 party Date of Decision: 15 February 2019 Date of Issue: 15 February 2019 PROCEDURAL DECISION A: The appeal is struck out under section 279(4) RMA. B: Costs are reserved. Any application should be made within ten working days of issue of this decision. REASONS CSF TRUSTEES l TO v QlDC - PROCEDURAL DECISION 2 Introduction [1] On 2 November 2018 Mrs S R F Knowles applied under section 279(4) of the Resour...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 74 Tairawhiti District Health Board v NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...Judgment: 14 June 2016 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN Nature of case [1] This judgment decides a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority 1 about a disputed question of the interpretation, operation and application of a Multi-Employer Collective Agreement (a MECA). It deals, in particular, with questions of status, seniority and salary steps where relevant employees move between employers covered by the same collective agreement....

10. Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley [2016] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 601 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 019/16 UNDER the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND CHRISTOPHER TWIGLEY Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr J Bishop Mr W Chapman Mr M Gough Mr A Marshall HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE OF HEARING 2 and 3 November 2016 DATE OF DECISION 19 Decembe...