Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal theme U - Land with All Woods and Waters [pdf, 1010 KB]

   ...Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Chapter 2: Resource Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 The Wai 262 claim 9; Preserving biodiversity 10; Eco-system restoration 13; Manawhenua/Kaitiakitanga 14; Claimant contentions 15; Hapu autonomy 15; The original possessors of the land 17; Boundaries 19; Commission: In particular, who controlled the transfer or...

2. [2024] NZREADT 25 - CAC 2107 v RCG Reality Ltd (29 July 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...operating a trust account and a guide for trust accounts and audit documentation for 3 RCG to complete. Once again, no notification of appointment of an auditor was received by the Authority. [14] On 9 December 2020, the Authority emailed RCG requesting that it complete the notification of auditor form. [15] On 23 April 2020, RCG engaged REB chartered accountants (the auditor) to audit the trust account. [16] On 11 December 2020, the Authority received a signed notification...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 103 Lewis v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...for the reason given above I believe this test has been met. [13] The pattern referred to in this determination was for the seasons worked in 2012/2013 and 2013/2014. [14] On 15 May 2015, the defendant responded to this determination and requested that the Inspector reconsider it. The defendant’s reasons for asking for a reconsideration were that it considered there was an absence of analysis by the Inspector of the special characteristics of the meat industry, the collectiv...

4. Gailbraith v CAC 10012 & McNabb [2011] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...requires an examination of the facts. Evidence was given only by Ms Galbraith and Mr Ross Buckley, the ultimate purchaser of the property which was being sold by the McNabbs in Shore Road, Remuera, Auckland. [11] Mr and Mrs McNabb had two sites which formed the basis for one large home and tennis court at 75B & 79 Shore Road, Remuera. They wished to sell this property. Reference will also be made to another section they owned in Lucerne Road, Remuera which, after listing the Sho...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 4 Dalley v Norrell Building Ltd [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...reasons for dismissal subsequently given. [2] Mr Dalley pursued a personal grievance alleging that his dismissal was unjustifiable. He also sought a penalty for the Company’s failure to provide him with a written employment agreement. These claims were investigated by the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) which determined 1 that the dismissal was unjustifiable. The Authority found, however, that Mr Dalley had 1...

6. Wellington Standards Committee 1 v McCardle [2025] NZLCDT 3 (10 January 2025) [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZLCDT 3 LCDT 017/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND JOHN VINCENT MCCARDLE Practitioner DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Dr B McCulloch Ms G Phipps Ms I Taylor Dr D Tulloch DATE OF HEARING 4 December 2024 HELD AT District Court, Wellin...

7. Follow-up-report-to-the-United-Nations-Committee-against-Torture_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 384 KB]

   ...establishes the rights of persons in detention and other persons vulnerable to abuse or ill-treatment. The Optional Protocol provides for the creation of international and national bodies to monitor places of detention to prevent torture and other forms of ill- treatment. 4 The United Nations’ (UN) Committee against Torture (the Committee) periodically examines member states on their compliance with the Convention. The Committee is made up of a panel of ten independent experts. 5 New...

8. LCRO 85/2016 BA v FE [pdf, 280 KB]

   LCRO 85/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN BA Applicant AND FE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Miss BA has applied to review a decision of the [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 021 Royal Forest & Bird Protections Society Incorporated v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...(such as SEA). C: There are no further alterations to the plan required or directed by this Court, with the intent that works within the SEA zone, even in the MPPZ, will require a consent as a non-complying activity. D: Costs are reserved. Any application for costs is to be made within 20 working days, any reply within 10 working days and a final reply, if any, five working days thereafter. REASONS Introduction [1] This issue was originally part of a general appeal in respec...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 120 G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Livingston [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...http://www.westlaw.co.nz/maf/wlnz/app/document?&src=rl&docguid=I2c098cf3e03011e08eefa443f89988a0&hitguid=I9841e37d9d3411e0a619d462427863b2&snippets=true&startChunk=1&endChunk=1&isTocNav=true&tocDs=AUNZ_CASE_TOC&extLink=false#anchor_I9841e37d9d3411e0a619d462427863b2� in a case of breach of contract to recover a sum which is out of proportion to the loss which actually occurs.8 [24] There appear to have been no previous decisions of this Court or it...