Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 180 HelloWorld Travel Services (NZ) Ltd v Unsworth [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...any of the above questions is yes, whether the relief sought (declarations and orders to repay money) should be granted. Background [4] As noted above, this is a non-de novo challenge. The initial proceeding in the Authority involved two broad claims that:3 (a) Helloworld’s reliance on the closedown provisions in the Holidays Act 2003 to close the business on 27 March 2020, and the reduction in the defendants’ pay from that date until their employment ended, unjustifiably d...

2. [2016] NZEnvC 248 Northcote Point Heritage Preservation Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act NORTHCOTE POINT HERITAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2015-AKL-0001 01) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent WOODWARD INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL AUCKLAND TRANSPORT CYCLE ACTION AUCKLAND GENERATION ZERO MEZZANINE CAPITAL LIMITED NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY PANUKUDEVELOPMENTAUCKLAND Section 274 Parties Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook Enviro...

3. Davies - Te Haroto Marae Maori Reservation (2015) 45 Takitimu MB 174 (45 TKT 174) [pdf, 438 KB]

   ...TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20140012445 UNDER Sections 37, 237, 239 and 338 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Haroto Marae Māori Reservation BETWEEN TE HOROWAI DAVIES Applicant Hearings: 38 Takitimu MB 160-186 dated 3 February 2015 40 Takitimu MB 129-131 dated 6 May 2015 42 Takitimu MB 227-239 dated 5 August 2015 45 T...

4. LCRO 007/2017 NT YR v HV [pdf, 89 KB]

   LCRO 7/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN NT and YR Applicant AND HV Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr NT and Mr YR (the complainants) have applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standard...

5. Proactive release – Remuneration Authority Legislation Bill [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...Remuneration Authority Legislation Bill Date of issue: 11 October 2021 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it....

6. Gangs-Legislation-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 692 KB]

   ...– Gangs Legislation Amendment Bill Date of issue: 4 April 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No. D...

7. Cations v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) [2018] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...determination is the quantum of the fine. Substantive decision Property A [4] Property A was listed by Mr Cations under an Agency Agreement dated 6 December 2016, specifying a commencement date of 9 January 2017. However, Mr Cations was requested by the solicitor acting on behalf of the vendor to erect a sign and advertise the property over the holiday period. He therefore erected a sale sign at the property on 23 December 2016. Mr Cations was told by his Branch Manager to re...

8. Witehira - Awarua A25 (2008) 128 Whangarei MB 282 (128 WH 282) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...Judgment: Introduction A20060027699 UNDER Section 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Awanla A25 20 Februal)' 2007 11 October 2007 08 October 2008 (Heard at Whangarei) 2 December 2008 CEIL/A WITEHIRA Applicant RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D.J AMBLER [1] Tills application conccms Awallla A25 ("the land") and the Awallla A25 Tnlst ("the Trust"). [2] The application began as Hn application to appoint replacement trustees u...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 034 Remarkables Park Limited v Queenstown Airport Corporation Limited [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...v QAC - PWA DECISION 2 confirmed by the Environment Court in March 2017, with the appeal against its decisions being finally determined by the High Court in March 2018. [3] As this is an objection to taking of land, this decision takes the form of a report to the Queenstown Airport Corporation Ltd. While in written submissions Remarkables Park Ltd said the "sole issue" for determination was whether the taking was fair, sound and reasonably necessary in terms of s 24(7)...

10. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Morrison [2018] NZLCDT 40 [pdf, 339 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZLCDT 40 LCDT 003/18 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER Applicant AND ANDREW MacLEAN MORRISON Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall (retired) MEMBERS Mr S Maling Mr H Matthews Mr K Raureti Mr B Stanaway DATE OF HEARING 29 October 2018 HELD AT District Court Auckland DATE OF DECISION 27 November 2018 CO...