Search Results

1. NM v BU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1580 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...

2. LO v SD [2021] NZDT 1388 (3 July 2019) [pdf, 222 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1388 APPLICANT LO RESPONDENT SD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Ms O and Ms D were friends when Ms O approached Ms D for help accessing cheap flights to [Country A]. Ms O's son was getting married and the whole family was travelling to [Country A] for the wedding. Ms O knew that...

3. IO v TH Ltd [2024] NZDT 151 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...provided quotes or estimates showing costs of $900.00 plus GST to remove the substandard film, $1,026.04 to repair the bumper, and $4,366.60 to repair the console and mirror. 7. The total sum including the refund comes to well over the $5,500.00 claimed, but IO cannot recover more than the amount of his claim. I have therefore ordered payment of $5,500.00. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 26 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings Y...

4. P Ltd v UC [2024] NZDT 384 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 384 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT UC The Tribunal orders: UC is to pay P Ltd $2,158.51 on or before 19 June 2024. Reasons 1. In or around November 2018, UC asked P Ltd to complete some repair work on a boat. P Ltd completed the work and invoiced UC. UC did not pay. The account was referred to P Ltd’s debt collectors but when...

5. DD v SQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 72 (31 January 2022) [pdf, 129 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 72 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT SQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. SQ Ltd has left open its offer to reimburse the cost of paint it has supplied for painting her house and to supply a further two litres of white paint. It will be up to DD as to whether she accepts that offer. Background...

6. Criminal Fixed Fee schedules 2018 updated 5 October 2023 [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...client • receiving, reviewing and/or preparing disclosure • identifying legal and factual issues • undertaking research • reviewing evidence (including videos/DVDs) • liaising with prosecutor/court • identifying the need for applications, interlocutories etc. • entering plea • any agent fees • reporting to client. - when additional charges are added to the legal aid grant * $90 Charge discussions $120 • engaging in charge discussions and/or...

7. OIA-98286.pdf [pdf, 135 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 2 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 98286 Tēnā koe Official Information Act 1982 request: Advice provided to Tenancy Tribunal Adjudicators Thank you for your email of 11 August 2022, requesting information on any advice provided to Tenancy Tribunal (the Tribunal) adjudicators with respect to handling meth related claims...

8. KB & PB v VI Ltd & OQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 144 (16 August 2022) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT VI Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT OQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. VI Ltd is to pay PB and KB the sum of $8,226.74 on or before 6 September 2022. 2. The claim against OQ Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. [The applicants] purchased a property and moved into it in October 2021. The previous owners had had some building and plumbing work carried out in the bathroom, in August 2021 while the house was empty and ready for sale. When [the applicants] moved i...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 143 George v Auckland Council [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...predecessor, the Auckland Regional Council (ARC). Team allegedly provided to Ms George two opinions on taxation matters which it is alleged she did not disseminate and which led to the AC incurring substantial taxation liability. These matters form the basis of the damages claim against her. Ms George in her affidavits contended that there are documents, or classes of documents, which she has requested and which have not yet been disclosed by the AC. [5] In broad terms, Ms Ge...

10. Q Ltd v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 659 (30 November 2023) [pdf, 126 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 659 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. F Ltd is to pay $16,339.20 to Q Ltd on or before 12 January 2024. Reasons: 2. In September 2021, the Respondent placed an order with the Applicant for the manufacture and supply of [a louvre roof] for installation at a client’s address. A quote in the amount of $16,891...