Search Results

1. CAC20004 v Li & Ors [2015] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...2015 Mr Rea filed a further submission referring to a decision of His Honour Judge B A Gibson in the Auckland District Court, namely, Li v Shiron and 4 Barfoot and Thompson Ltd CIV-2013-092-3311. Essentially, the District Court dismissed a claim pursued by the purchaser complainants in this disciplinary case (Saiyad Shiron and Shazra Ali) who had sought to make a third party civil claim against Barfoot and Thompson Ltd relating to the matters the subject of the disciplinary com...

2. 2024 NZPSPLA 067.pdf [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...the situation and tried to convince staff to go against standard policy so that his cousin could get the pay out. Mr Biddle became progressively more intimidating towards the staff who felt threatened by his demeanour. He began swearing at them and claimed to have substantial knowledge of the gambling industry and appropriate processes. [8] At the time Mr Biddle was wearing notable red shoes, often associated with the Mongrel Mob, and a cap inscribed with “Mob Music”. Tavern Staff...

3. Proactive release - Prisoner Voting [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Proactive release - Prisoner Voting Date of issue: 17 April 2020 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (18) 4. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No....

4. Dr Te Kipa Kepa Brian Morgan - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...bil­ lion US dollars. In October 2015, a resource consent hearing was concluded, and this sought approval to abandon the remaining sections of the Rena wreck on Otaiti. Maori submissions to the hearing process were divided between opposition to the applicant's request and support from others, including the Te Arawa ki Tai tribal grouping. Te Arawa !ct Tai have adapted the Mauri Model Decision Malting Framework to provide a better understanding of the recovery process, and the holistic...

5. BU v DG LCRO 276 / 2011 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 102 KB]

   LCRO 276/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee BETWEEN BU Applicant AND DG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application by BU for a review of a Standards Committee decision dated 27 October 2011 to dismiss t...

6. Hewitt v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 72 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

7. McLaren v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 78 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...overseas bank accounts. [38] Accordingly, in its decision upholding this complaint the Tribunal gave Mr Standing notice that if there was an issue relating to his ability to pay, he should provide information that allowed the Tribunal to evaluate the claim with regard to the funds which had not been accounted for. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the Tribunal would proceed on the basis Mr Standing had the means to meet financial sanctions that fully reflect the findings agai...

8. Director of Proceedings v Hurst [2019] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...Consent Memorandum is in the following terms: MAY IT PLEASE THE TRIBUNAL 1. The plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a summary of facts, a signed copy of which is filed with this memorandum, together with an anonymised copy. 2. The plaintiff requests that the Tribunal exercises its jurisdiction and issues: (a) A declaration pursuant to section 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 ("the Act") that the defendant has breached the Health and Disability C...

9. JD v RU LCRO 55 / 2011 (22 March 2012) [pdf, 130 KB]

   LCRO 55/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 5 BETWEEN Mr JD Applicant AND Mr RU Respondent DECISION Background [1] Mr JD is the father of a child victim of an indecent act by an adult. Mr RU acted for the accused. [2] The incidents out of which Mr JD’s complaints arise took place at the [...

10. LCRO 44/2017 JJ v IO, UZ, [Law Firm A] [pdf, 233 KB]

    LCRO 44/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN JJ Applicant AND IO, UZ & [Law Firm A] (now [Law Firm D]) Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] JJ (Ms JJ) has applied for a review of a decision by the [Are...